|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News | |
8800GT benchmarks
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
RAM Fan
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
and I'm not dragging your personal circumstances into anything, unless of course your parents are dead, or you really are 13 and still believe in Ol' Saint Nick... I simply asked you if you believe everything that "reputable" sources tell you... *Edit: Oh, and the fact that you said I wasn't clever or funny makes it 10x better, because that lets me know that you knew it was, and your trying to shut it down....
Last edited by FilthySanchez08 : 10-14-07 at 07:50 PM |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
I will call it BS, i just don't get it.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,873
Rep: 226
![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 14
|
Ok, I actually feel like getting in the middle of this one. Guy who goes by sanchez- Anyone who would actually try to be a jerk like you are right now, probably is 13-16 years old. Little kids are nice to people, and anyone over 16 realizes that there isn't any point in being a jerk, because all you do is make enemies who will try to cut you off at the knees. So, to make this simple, you're not impressing anyone by ****y remarks and bold disrespect. So stop.
Btw, since when does someone saying something isn't clever or funny mean it was clever and funny? Also, it really wasn't clever or funny, just more of a 13-year-old joke. It blocked out c.o.c.k-y. And on a lighter note... nevermind, can't think of anything.
__________________
Last edited by mth91 : 10-14-07 at 08:06 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
is orbiting pluto.
![]() |
Probably not fake, just some crappy ass benchmarks..
__________________
Lian Li V2000 Case | MCP655 Pump Chrome Mod | Danger Den Maze4 | Swiftech Apogee | Aqua-Computer Airplex Evo Pro Xtreme 240 Tygon Ultra-Soft 1/2" Tubing | Thermaltake Bigwater Coolant | SilenX iXtrema Pro Fans | Chipforce Chipset Cooler
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,873
Rep: 226
![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 14
|
lol, Can't call it bs if you don't get it. Either way, the truth is that we'll just have to wait until it comes out to see the real performance. The chances are that the benchmarks are real, even if the prices aren't. If they're putting in a new card with 112 shader processors, then those benchmarks show that it's in the right place. Between the old gts and gtx. Old gts has 96 shader processors, and gtx has 128, so yeah, it should be right between the two.
Anyone disagree?
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
RAM Fan
![]() |
Quote:
![]() You're gonna make me cry man ![]() I have no friends (on OCN) If this card coming out really does have 112 shaders, then these tests may be less fake than I originally thought... but EVERY SINGLE article ive read so far has told me otherwise.... everyone is saying these are a 8600-8800gts gap closer... because if i remember correctly, the 8600gts has 32 shaders, and the 8800gts has 96, which is a more important gap to close than the one between the gts/gtx because the majority of consumers aren't willing to spend more than $200 dollars on a video card
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,873
Rep: 226
![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 14
|
Quote:
I saw that bit about how it was supposed to be between 8600gts and 8800gts, but I don't think it's going to end up working out that way. If you want to put it between 8600gts and 8800gts, you would need like 64 shader processors, but since it has 112, that sort of defeats that purpose. Or also maybe they'll put 64 shader processors in it and then put the 112 in the new gts. I heard that idea somewhere too. I sure hope that they get the 112 in the gt though because then they'll have made what equates to the best bang-for-buck card since the 7600gt. Either way, i'll probably end up buying it.
__________________
Last edited by mth91 : 10-14-07 at 08:14 PM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
x.x
__________________Why does the GTX beat the ultra in that?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
RAM Fan
![]() |
Quote:
and I think its going to be the first option you said, based on what they've said about how they're pricing the gt but theres always hope though, if these do have 64 shaders, then you can SLI them and itll be roughly equivalent of 1 GTX and if they are priced at $200, then you can get that performance for only 400 dollars! hooray for the green team! (but ATI is still better)
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
just walk away...
![]() |
It's amazing how many people are blindingly accepting those benchmarks as fact, and how others are blowing them off like they're nothing. The truth is:
WE DON'T KNOW YET
__________________
Je pense, donc je suis - René Descartes Freedom gives people the ability to either succeed or to fail. Ensuring success at the expense of freedom is nothing short of tyranny. Overclock.net Professionalism Initiative
Last edited by Choggs396 : 10-14-07 at 08:31 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|