|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News | |
[HWC] EVGA 8800GTS 640MB SSC Edition Review (the one w/ 112SP's)
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
Link
__________________Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Cyph3r : 11-09-07 at 01:58 PM. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
<= Humanaut
|
Ok, so the SSC is fatter and hogs more power but barely keeps up with the GT?
The ONLY reason for this card is to fill the gap between GT supply and demand.
__________________
Member of Team Owners - 1st to hit 200k and 250K![]() "That was typed in caps, and made lowercase by the forum, nice stuff there ![]() I guess in OCN, nobody can hear you scream" -TheNix
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Nvidia should of made the new 8800GTS have the G92 core with more SPs than the 8800GT G92. It would then match 8800GTX performance, instead of being on par or a little better than the much cheaper 8800GT. The new 8800GTS would also been a lot cheaper because the G92 uses 65nm architecture (better yields than G80) and a 256-bit memory interface (cheaper than having 320-bit).
But no they made it on the older G80...
__________________
. Current E6420: L645G573, E6420@3.60ghz, 9hr 100% Stable and 14.672s SuperPI 1M Old E6300:'12hr Stable@3.40ghz and 17.000s SuperPi 1M, Highest: 3.70ghz 98% OC and 15.610s SuperPi 1M
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
|
It wouldn't be such a bad choice for those playing at resolutions higher then 1600x1200.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
So you'd honestly recommend it to such people over the 8800GT even though its more expensive and the 8800GT can easily be OC'ed to be even better?
__________________
Last edited by Cyph3r : 11-09-07 at 02:28 PM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Extreme resolutions benefit from more than 512MB memory i think, so that would probably be why.
__________________
Quote:
![]() CPU-Z Validated
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|