|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News | |
[ExpRev] 9800GTX GPU-z screen shot!
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
a.k.a. TutenStain
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden, Mullsjö
Posts: 4,664
Rep: 615
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 352
Trader Rating: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Source GPU-z Validation
__________________
Please ignor my spelling and grammar! FAQ:s I reject your reality and substitute my own. -Adam Savage
Last edited by i_ame_killer_2 : 02-26-08 at 05:20 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
Not really exciting at all, wonder why they put a G92 in there :S
edit - no DX 10.1 support?
__________________
"Such is life"
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Very sad. I thought only the GX2 will be using g92's. Now the GTX is too, what a let down.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
disappointing, but expected. It's exciting to finally see some hard proof of the core thought. many ppl around here were in denial it was a g92, lol. +rep
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Windows Wrangler
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,302
Rep: 402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 294
Trader Rating: 2
|
That will make anyone who bought a 8800GTS 512 (or GT) glad they didn't wait.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: in pencil vain yah
Posts: 2,374
Rep: 214
![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 167
Trader Rating: 41
|
It is not even a 1gb card I am calling HAX, I def think this is a fake. I mean cmon why would they waste there time making a sub par GTX.
__________________
"All the true things I am about to tell you are shameless lies" Kurt Vonnegut
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
I'm happy with what i'm seeing. Granted the 9600GT is a monster even though it has less SPs than the 8800GT, i bet this outperforms the ultra by a lot. Not gonna wait for one though my step up ends so i'm getting a GTS until the G100 comes out Q3-4
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Back in the game!
![]() |
I bet you that is a fake.. Them specs are poor... And isn't it supposed to be DX10.1
And also... I dont think GPU-Z would recognise it yet anyway.
__________________
THE 1080p+ MAX OUT![]() --Graphics set-ups I've had before-- SLI PoV 8800GTX's | SLI eVGA 9800GTX's | SLI Zotac GTX280's | SLI XFX GTX280's
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
wait only 16 rops? My 8800GTX has 24...
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Its hard to think that this is ture. Its just a 8800GTS 512MB with a different name. I don't see anything in the GPU-Z screen shot to tell me other wize.
Other than a 25MHz boost on the GPU clock and a small memory/shader clock speed boost they are the same card just with different names. Are there no LAWS in place to stop companys for riping-off stupid people that may buy something like this?
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6420@3.32GHz and P35 FSB@1900MHz. ![]() http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=510133 3D Mark 06 score 11422 ![]() http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=12071981
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|