|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News | |
[expreview] Phenom X3 vs Core 2 Duo's
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Nope, thats just the demo. The full version uses up to 4 cores, if I remember correctly.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Security Sleuth
![]() |
To anyone who says, 'Hah AMD has to use 3 cores to be our awsome intel dual cores'
__________________If AMD sell the Tri Core @ Dual Core prices, this is a major win over Intel - AMD are really using their iniative on this one, their quad cores arent the best so they are taking a similar architecture that they can cheaply produce to beat the enemy - Awsome I hope AMD does well with this, i'd certainly buy one if it was at the right price and had some OC'in potential
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Ahahahahahaha! This is hilarious! Intel is walking on AMD with these Core 2 processors...I had higher hopes for the X3 than this...they definitely need to find some higher clock speeds pretty quick to keep up with the mid-high end E8400 Core 2's. I'm talking 3Ghz stock speeds or better.
__________________
----------------------------- E8400 at 4.4GHz ![]() P13491 in Futuremark Vantage 18774 3DMarks in 3DMark06
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
----------------------------- E8400 at 4.4GHz ![]() P13491 in Futuremark Vantage 18774 3DMarks in 3DMark06
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Folding Fanatic
![]() |
I need an overclocking test, and then comparisons at maximum overclocks and at similar overclocks...
Nice find none the less... Why do the chinese get this stuff before us?
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
Quote:
Looky on a map. Plus they probably have people on the inside. (IE: Guy works at Taiwanese factory, lives in Taiwan, yet is Chinese)
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Windows Wrangler
![]() |
Quote:
So I imagine 2 faster cores would beat 3 slower ones.
__________________
<Looking for funny quote> AIM: Box of Internets Xfire: arkanor241 Help us build a useful repository of i7 overclocking information and discussion by joining the Core i7 club!
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
No comment... LOL.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Nope. Play it and all 4 cores are churning along just fine.
__________________I doubt if AMD's numbers are even that good. Expreview sucks imho. No matter what comes out, if its AMD or ATI they strangley call "WIN!!!" while all other reputable sites are calling "FAIL!!!" ![]() Screw expreview ![]() +rep though, nice find...i think muwahahaha
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|