ChiliCheeseFritos

Wait....

Are you saying there was more to the video than her boobs?

__________________

Mr.MidЯange

I don't really know! And I really cannot say either, cause if I re-watch it (just looking at the starting pic to the video is enough), It makes it way too hard to even listen.

RickJS

You're delusional if you think this doesn't have a chance of happening here. This is already in issue with congress about net neutrality. I don't understand whats hard to understand about this issue either.

DuckieHo

Why? Go to Parliament instead.

__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Report, not respond to Spam (7) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular

Odyn

Horrible. Imagine if your internet company threw net neut out the window and slowed all your connections to certain webpages by 10-15 seconds per pop. Or even more... or they only trickled data to your IP because you are a heavy user of certain high-bandwidth webpages... then imagine one of those paying websites being something like conanthebarbarian.com, something 0.0000001% of the internet will actually goto, whereas google, youtube, OCN all have connection problems or their websites are running slow because they didnt pony up extra dough for more bandwidth.

Maybe what im saying is a bit exaggerated, but I can totally seeing greedy ISPs doing it. Comcast tried it but failed, lets see who else does it -_-

__________________
█▀█ █▀▀ ▀█▀ █▀█ █ █▀▄ █░█ ▀█▀ █ █▀█ █▀█
█▀▄ █▀▀ ░█░ █▀▄ █ █▀▄ █░█ ░█░ █ █░█ █░█
▀░▀ ▀▀▀ ░▀░ ▀░▀ ▀ ▀▀░ ▀▀▀ ░▀░ ▀ ▀▀▀ ▀░▀

RickJS

You didn't understand what he said. He doesn't agree with the companies, but if net neutrality wins like we want, that means the government will have to regulate it and he would rather it be with neither.

Meanwhile I agree with net neutrality because if its either comcast or the government I'm going with the government. We have more of a say there than the companies.

kennymester

I say go with the lesser of two evils. On one hand you can get the gov involved, but then we are subject to their rules and regulations. If we stay with private organizations then we still have power. If one of these companies gets out of hand we have the power. Just stop using that company. If enough people follow it will send a clear message and if not we can pool some dough together and start our own ISP.

__________________

RickJS

The governments rule and regulations are all influenced by us. Private organizations will do whatever it takes to make some money. I really don't understand how you can be against net neutrality. If one company does it and it works, then others will do it too. You think just boycotting will stop them?

Porthios

Doesn't everyone already pay based on how much bandwidth they want for their site anyway?

Shadowrunner340

they pay for how much connection speed they have. now, if you have a website, and you want good speed TO YOUR SITE, you'll have to pay more

but good question, anyways

EDIT: people who agree with this should put a link to this thread in their sigs, on all forums they belong to. and i know what the net neutrality bill in congress says, but i'm for keeping gov't and companies both out of regulating the net. it's been self-regulating just fine for a long time, it should stay that way

__________________
Defend net neutrality!

IQ=142 http://www.free-iqtest.net