Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-08   #41 (permalink)
ATI Enthusiast
 
darkcloud89's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,013
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: 163 darkcloud89 is acknowledged by manydarkcloud89 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 114
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dglkn View Post
Why not just do a rating system based on 3dmarks?
Like...

DX9
Minimum 3dmark06 score: x000
Recommended: x000

DX10
Minimum 3dmark Vantage score: x000
Recommended: x000
This is what Microsoft tried to do with the Windows Experience Index in Vista, and it doesn't really work out. 3DMark is too CPU dependant to be used for rating game requirements. The real problem with PC gaming is manufacturers talking up performance and '3d' on their machines and then sticking in a POS IGP with no upgrade options, leaving the customer frustrated and clueless as to why they can't play games.

That being said, while I don't think AMD's system here is perfect, it is a step in the right direction. AMD has the whole platform now and it's time they took advantage of that. What I don't understand is why AMD/ATi isn't using this as a tool to promote hybrid crossfire. Really I think that has the potential to make pc gaming more popular because a company like Dell could sell the regular desktop with the (not as) crappy IGP and then add 'gaming capability' for another like $60-80. I did read that AMD hopes that the PC Gaming Alliance as a whole will develop a similar system that Intel and Nvidia would be a part of, and that the Game! initiative was kind of a model for this. The end result here is that if all three of the major players get involved, it kind of forces the mainstream manufacturers into using some sort of gaming certification system which would ideally make pc gaming easier and therefore more popular.

I think the more significant impact isn't going to be AMD/ATi marketing, but more of an industry push for some kind of standard labeling so people who aren't as saavy have a reasonable idea as to the capabilities of their system.
__________________
System: Redeemer
CPU
AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.51 / NB @ 2.6GHz
Motherboard
Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Memory
8gb G.Skill
Graphics Card
ATI Radeon HD4870
Hard Drive
640GB + 1.0TB WD Black
Power Supply
Corsair 750TX
Case
Antec 900
CPU cooling
Dark Knight
OS
Windows 7 x64 / Arch Linux
Monitor
22" Acer

Last edited by darkcloud89 : 05-19-08 at 07:13 PM
darkcloud89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-08   #42 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
slipstream808's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 1,023

Rep: 19 slipstream808 Unknown
Unique Rep: 18
Trader Rating: 0
Default

So this is gonna "consolize" the PC. Interesting. BUT, people will still learn that if they want to play these PC games, they will be buying a costly system and may just say screw it and go for the console. Then again, it might be a boon in that people will buy a PC made for games since they are buying a PC anyways.
__________________
-Tyler

"The shortest distance between two points is always under construction."

Member of the OCN Diablo 3 Club

System: The Core
CPU
Intel Q9450 @ 3.4GHz
Motherboard
DFI LP DK P45-T2RS PLUS LGA 775 Intel P45
Memory
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 2GB (1 x 2GB) DDR2 1066
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Superclocked Edition
Hard Drive
320GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
Thermaltake Purepower 600 W dual 12v rail
Case
Coolermaster Cosmos S
CPU cooling
Swiftech GTX watercooled
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Windows XP Sp-2
Monitor
ViewSonic VG2230wm
slipstream808 is offline slipstream808's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-08   #43 (permalink)
Windows Wrangler
 
Arkanor's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 737

Rep: 44 Arkanor is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 40
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stargate125645
You know why this is pointless? Because games already have system requirements on the boxes! If the consumer is too stupid to make sure the system they buy is capable of playing the game(s) they want to play on it then they can wallow in their own wasted money-induced self pity.

Having "gaming ready" labels (or something similar) won't help matters since it still doesn't tell the consumer for which games the PC is "ready."
System requirements on the box did not stop my brother from receiving Crysis for his Vaio with integrated graphics.
__________________
<Looking for funny quote>

AIM: Box of Internets
Xfire: arkanor241
Help us build a useful repository of i7 overclocking information and discussion by joining the Core i7 club!

System: Steel Talon
CPU
Core i7 920 @3.70 @1.20V
Motherboard
MSI X58 Platinum
Memory
3x2GB OCZ DDR3
Graphics Card
2x HIS HD4870 1GB
Hard Drive
Seagate 7200.11 1TB
Sound Card
Soundblaster Audigy 2
Power Supply
Antec Truepower 650
Case
Thermaltake V9 Black Edition
CPU cooling
CM Hyper N520
GPU cooling
AMD Reference
OS
Vista Ultimate x64, Fedora 10 x64, Windows 7 x64
Monitor
Dell 2407WFP
Arkanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
amd game, amd pc


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17161 seconds with 8 queries