Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-20-08   #41 (permalink)
Linux Lobbyist
 
FearMeansControl's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wrong Island, NY
Posts: 1,418

Rep: 94 FearMeansControl is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 83
Trader Rating: 2
Default

Yeah, I'd be furious as well, with the prices that are coming out now on them..

I have a feeling Nvidia's going to be facing a pretty pissed off customer base in a few months when all is said and done.

Does anyone else think this has been one of the more atrocious release periods in recent history?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nitteo View Post
The biggest contribution we can make F@h is by spreading the word. A farm of 100 people will last longer than a farm of 100 GPUs.
(450x8) (417x9) (425x9)

System: Jesus PC v5.3
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
Gigabyte X38-DS4
Memory
OCZ PC-8000 4x2 GB
Graphics Card
Quadro FX-4600 & FX-1400
Hard Drive
3x1200.12 500GB RAID 0, 2x7200.11 500GB RAID 1
Sound Card
Presonus Firepod + Yamaha HS-5M's
Power Supply
OCZ StealthxStream 600W
Case
RocketPwn
CPU cooling
Fuzion v2, mcw-30, GTX 360, D5, CD Waterfall Res.
GPU cooling
Stock, re-applied with AS5
OS
Gentoo, XP x64
Monitor
Samsung Syncmaster 2253LW + 2x17" LCD's
2 Million+ Folding at Home points
FearMeansControl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #42 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 193

Rep: 16 Gaz32 Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterKromm View Post
WOW, that's crazy... If I bought a 9800GTX within the last month I'd be irate, Nvidia needs to offer an exchange program(EX, in July you send in your current 9800GTX and get a GTX+ at no added cost) since they completely blindsided everyone with the release of GTX+ and normal GTX price cuts.

Roger that, luckily i got the BFG and have the tradeup option on both cards.
As nice as the new ATI cards are looking the only sensible thing for me to do is trade my 2 9800s for the 280s.
__________________
I wish my lawns were emo - then they'd cut themselves!!

System: Never ends
CPU
Core I7 920 DO @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard
GA-EX58-UD5
Memory
6X Corsair TR3X1600C7 6G
Graphics Card
SLI Zotac GTX260 AMP2
Hard Drive
WD Cavair black 1G
Sound Card
Asus Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply
Antec 1000W
Case
Antec 1200
CPU cooling
Mugen 2
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Vista Premium x64
Monitor
BenQ E2400HD
Gaz32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #43 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 403

Rep: 28 dejanh is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 26
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
I really have to wonder why other reviews show very different numbers...
http://techreport.com/articles.x/14967/4
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3338&p=7

Surely a small OC and a die shrink doesn't account for such a large difference in FPS?
Well, here is my problem with this. I can tell your for a fact (I'm running it right now) that installing the GTX2xx optimized drivers for any of the 8xxx and 9xxx cards gives about 10% - 15% boost in performance. Since they are using 177.39 drivers which are effectively the official GTX2xx-type drivers packaged for 8/9xxx series, I can say pretty comfortably that is where they are getting the performance increase from. Having said that, I again have some issues with this review...

(1) When they are testing the OC on the HD4850 they use Catalyst to OC it, and they do not even get past 690MHz there resulting in a 65MHz boost. On the other hand, they OC the GTX+ with EVGA proprietary tool to 102MHz more than the base core speed resulting in a 840MHz core. Therefore, the comparisons are not exactly fair.
(2) They are testing NVIDIA's optimized driver against the first release of Catalyst driver for the 4850, which again does not really hold up.
(3) Last strange thing I saw is that GPUZ seems to identify their GTX+ as a regular GTX, at 65nm process. I'll assume GPUZ is wrong, or else this whole review is garbage.

In all, even if this review is true I'd say that you should expect the HD4850 to be able to pull ahead when, (a) the drivers mature a bit, (b) when manufacturers do some aftermarket cooling on these cards, (c) when the aftermarket OC tools start to support the HD4850 so you can comparatively OC the two (this I bet will be the biggest difference maker), and (d) when the price of the HD4850 drops by another $20-$30.
__________________
╩╪Unofficial Lego Lovers Club╩╪

CoolIT TEC Club

The Core i7 100% Stability Club


System: The Snail (Improved)
CPU
Intel Core i7 920 D0, 4.547GHz, HyperThreading On
Motherboard
EVGA X58 SLI Classified w/ EK-FB Chipset Block
Memory
6GB Dominator 1733MHz, 8-8-8-20-1T, 4.33GHz Uncore
Graphics Card
BFG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (216) OC 718/1538/1223
Power Supply
Antec TruePower Quattro 1000W
Case
Antec 900 Gamer Case
CPU cooling
HeatKiller 3.0 CU, 2x MCR320-QP, 2x DDC 3.2
GPU cooling
Stock
Monitor
NEC MultiSync LCD225WXM
dejanh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #44 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 193

Rep: 16 Gaz32 Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

@ dejanh

I got a about 5% increase with my 9800s

Have you tried the Nvidia physX 8.06.12 drivers with it they worked fine for me
http://nekrosoft.net/NVIDIA_physX_8_06_12_driver.exe
__________________
I wish my lawns were emo - then they'd cut themselves!!

System: Never ends
CPU
Core I7 920 DO @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard
GA-EX58-UD5
Memory
6X Corsair TR3X1600C7 6G
Graphics Card
SLI Zotac GTX260 AMP2
Hard Drive
WD Cavair black 1G
Sound Card
Asus Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply
Antec 1000W
Case
Antec 1200
CPU cooling
Mugen 2
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Vista Premium x64
Monitor
BenQ E2400HD
Gaz32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #45 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Somenoob's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,489

Rep: 83 Somenoob is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 71
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by binormalkilla View Post
I really have to wonder why other reviews show very different numbers...
http://techreport.com/articles.x/14967/4
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3338&p=7

Surely a small OC and a die shrink doesn't account for such a large difference in FPS?
I was thinking the same thing.



Notice the position of the 4850 and 3870x2 in the first two benchmarks. In the third its in the bottom of the barrel...
__________________
You are now breathing and blinking manually.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hundred Gunner View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by onexero View Post
I suppose one good thing about a female companion is you are never bored when you are without power for 3 freakin days.
God I'm glad to have power again. ;x
Think very hard about what you just said... Realize how sad it is... And stop being a slave to pornography.

System: My (Little brothers) computer
CPU
E7300 345x10 1.3625v
Motherboard
Asus P5Q SE (replacing soon)
Memory
Corsair 2x2GB
Graphics Card
Sapphire 4870 Toxic 820/ 1070
Hard Drive
WD 320 GB
Power Supply
Cooler Master Real Power Pro 650W
Case
Cooler Master Centurion 5
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-s1283
GPU cooling
stock non-refernce
OS
Vista x64
Monitor
Acer 22''

Last edited by Somenoob : 06-20-08 at 12:50 PM
Somenoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #46 (permalink)
ATI Enthusiast
 
gamervivek's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,874

Rep: 166 gamervivek is acknowledged by manygamervivek is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 130
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
Well, here is my problem with this. I can tell your for a fact (I'm running it right now) that installing the GTX2xx optimized drivers for any of the 8xxx and 9xxx cards gives about 10% - 15% boost in performance. Since they are using 177.39 drivers which are effectively the official GTX2xx-type drivers packaged for 8/9xxx series, I can say pretty comfortably that is where they are getting the performance increase from. Having said that, I again have some issues with this review...

(1) When they are testing the OC on the HD4850 they use Catalyst to OC it, and they do not even get past 690MHz there resulting in a 65MHz boost. On the other hand, they OC the GTX+ with EVGA proprietary tool to 102MHz more than the base core speed resulting in a 840MHz core. Therefore, the comparisons are not exactly fair.
(2) They are testing NVIDIA's optimized driver against the first release of Catalyst driver for the 4850, which again does not really hold up.
(3) Last strange thing I saw is that GPUZ seems to identify their GTX+ as a regular GTX, at 65nm process. I'll assume GPUZ is wrong, or else this whole review is garbage.

In all, even if this review is true I'd say that you should expect the HD4850 to be able to pull ahead when, (a) the drivers mature a bit, (b) when manufacturers do some aftermarket cooling on these cards, (c) when the aftermarket OC tools start to support the HD4850 so you can comparatively OC the two (this I bet will be the biggest difference maker), and (d) when the price of the HD4850 drops by another $20-$30.
completely agree,9800gtx has been out quite for sometime and the drivers are quite mature and after getting familiar with the catalyst update nuances i can only see 4850's performance getting a big boost next few months.
as for gpuz,its probably not updated for the 9800gtx+.
__________________
there are only 10 kind of people in this world, those who understand ternary, those who don't, and then those who don't give a damn.

I see in Fight Club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering...

So bye-bye, miss american pie,gamervivek has left the building.

Ati Tray Tools vs CCC

System: living on the edge BSODs galore
CPU
e2140@3.2Ghz
Motherboard
abit IP35-E
Memory
4GB 667@800 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
HIS IceQ4 4850
Sound Card
soundblaster live! 24-bit
Power Supply
Corsair 450VX@stock
CPU cooling
Q6600's HSF
OS
win xp 32 bit
gamervivek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #47 (permalink)
nVidia Enthusiast
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,451

Rep: 135 Peroxide is acknowledged by manyPeroxide is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 115
Trader Rating: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
Well, here is my problem with this. I can tell your for a fact (I'm running it right now) that installing the GTX2xx optimized drivers for any of the 8xxx and 9xxx cards gives about 10% - 15% boost in performance. Since they are using 177.39 drivers which are effectively the official GTX2xx-type drivers packaged for 8/9xxx series, I can say pretty comfortably that is where they are getting the performance increase from. Having said that, I again have some issues with this review...

(1) When they are testing the OC on the HD4850 they use Catalyst to OC it, and they do not even get past 690MHz there resulting in a 65MHz boost. On the other hand, they OC the GTX+ with EVGA proprietary tool to 102MHz more than the base core speed resulting in a 840MHz core. Therefore, the comparisons are not exactly fair.
(2) They are testing NVIDIA's optimized driver against the first release of Catalyst driver for the 4850, which again does not really hold up.
(3) Last strange thing I saw is that GPUZ seems to identify their GTX+ as a regular GTX, at 65nm process. I'll assume GPUZ is wrong, or else this whole review is garbage.

In all, even if this review is true I'd say that you should expect the HD4850 to be able to pull ahead when, (a) the drivers mature a bit, (b) when manufacturers do some aftermarket cooling on these cards, (c) when the aftermarket OC tools start to support the HD4850 so you can comparatively OC the two (this I bet will be the biggest difference maker), and (d) when the price of the HD4850 drops by another $20-$30.
What else are they supposed to do?

Write seperate OC programs for AMD and nVidia to make things fair? Then not allow overclocking since if one OCs more, it'd be unfair to the one with no headroom. Last, when has GPU-Z had accurate information about a brand new card?
__________________
System: Early Christmas Present
CPU
e4700
Motherboard
eVGA 650i Ultra
Memory
G.SKILL F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD3850 512MB
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
Coolermaster Extreme Power 500W
Case
Antec 300
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Samsung 226BW
Peroxide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #48 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
intel ati

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,033

Rep: 388 NCspecV81 is a proven memberNCspecV81 is a proven memberNCspecV81 is a proven memberNCspecV81 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 263
Trader Rating: 27
Default

when was the 4850 going up against the 9800gtx+ anyways? Looking at other more reputable reviews has the 4850 edging out the 9800gtx quite soundly. I wouldn't expect just an overvolted and overclocked card to make 10fps drop for its competitor though. I call shenanigans!
NCspecV81 is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #49 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
mtbiker033's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 2,718

Rep: 154 mtbiker033 is acknowledged by manymtbiker033 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 140
Trader Rating: 9
Default

man I'm liking the 9800GTX+ and hope I can step up to them from my 8800GT's, I have about 33 days left I paid $189 ea. for them so if the pricing is at $229 that should be $40 ea for step up plus shipping. If I didn't have an nvidia chipset, I would be really tempted by the 4850 though, looks like a sweet card and damn it's about time we had a price war on our hands!! GOOD JOB ATI/AMD!!! we all win this fight!

System: <<BlueTornado>>
CPU
E7200 4.0ghz 1.40v bios / 1.37v win
Motherboard
750i FTW!
Memory
4gb Ballistix @ 842mhz
Graphics Card
SLI evga GTX260 216's @ 756/1512/1215
Hard Drive
WD raptor 150gb
Sound Card
X-fi Platinum Fatal1ty Champion
Power Supply
Corsair TX 750W
Case
CM690
CPU cooling
Zalman CNPS9700LED
GPU cooling
stock
OS
win7 x64 RC
Monitor
samsung T240 24"
mtbiker033 is offline mtbiker033's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-08   #50 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
darksideleader's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada, ON
Posts: 3,483

Rep: 178 darksideleader is acknowledged by manydarksideleader is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 161
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I'm seeing a very fast price drop for the 4850 nethertheless.
__________________
AMD + ATI fanboy in spirit
e6550 @ 3.8ghz

Quote:
Originally Posted by todd2008 View Post
If you overclock to 6.0 GHz you don't need 64-bit, because 6.0 GHz is so fast that it won't make any difference.

This is what the guy at Best Buy told me. LAWL
Quote:
Originally Posted by height iz nasty View Post
*** is a double lifetime warranty. If you're jesus and resurrect yourself from the dead and your card dies they'll replace it?

System: Cool, Quick and Quiet
CPU
Q6700
Motherboard
MSI P6N SLI Platinum
Memory
OCZ Vista Upgrade Platinum 4x2GB
Graphics Card
BFG GTS 250 1GB
Hard Drive
Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB x4
Sound Card
On-Board
Power Supply
Antec TruePower Trio 650 Watt
Case
Power Up Standard
CPU cooling
Thermaltake Big Typhoon w/ Scythe Kama PWN Fan
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit)
Monitor
Acer AL2216W 22" LCD + 17" Samsung Sync Master 750
darksideleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.21661 seconds with 8 queries