Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-28-09   #41 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
loop0001's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Eastern Washington, USA
Posts: 2,487

Rep: 61 loop0001 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 50
Trader Rating: 6
Default

so who can i trust for accurate and unbiased hardware reviews as far as video cards go??
someone on here?
__________________
Blood tastes good

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piter De Vries
It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of Sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
Behold!!! I am a Paradigm Shifter!!!

System: Generation
CPU
e6600
Motherboard
680i SLI SE
Memory
4gb (2x2) Mushkin 4-4-4-12
Graphics Card
BFG GTX 260 Core216
Hard Drive
2x500gb & 2x160gb WD
Power Supply
600W OCZ Gamestream
Case
*Modded, Painted* CM 690
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S963
GPU cooling
stock (for now)
OS
xp
Monitor
Dell S2208W 1600x1050
loop0001 is offline loop0001's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-09   #42 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
PhelanJKell's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,727

Rep: 117 PhelanJKell is acknowledged by manyPhelanJKell is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 94
Trader Rating: 10
Default

Rob has made all valid points, and I myself take the same reviews with a grain of salt. It is nice to know how well a card does on paper, but like Rob has posted that his own testing and others around here and forums elsewhere tend to have different results. Why is this? Drivers? Hardware? I think it all comes together and gives different results, look at how many variables there are within a given computer system to the next.

I like seeing information like Rob posted, that give what his rig, specs are doing with certain games. You can then look at others who do a similar style of tests and see the results. Each game handles ati/nvidia different, some better then others.
__________________
System: MR.MOTO
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
DFI DK X38
Memory
8GB Kingston HyperX DDR2 1066
Graphics Card
PowerCooler 2x 4870 1GB
Hard Drive
WD 500 Black RAID0
Power Supply
Silverstone 700w Modular
OS
Vista Ultimate 64-bit
Monitor
3x 22" LCD Samsung
PhelanJKell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #43 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
amd ati

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 823

Rep: 43 Bleached is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 34
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I find the best information these review sites give me is if a card and it's drivers play well. If a lot of review sites don't have problems installing and running things comfortably you know that something is wrong with the card. After some time of course the companies will work out the kinks, but if your looking to buy the card right off the bat this information is crucial.

If the card works great then it's price/performance.
__________________
System: Crosshairs
CPU
AMD Phenom II 955 C2
Motherboard
Crosshair III Formula
Memory
G.Skill Trident 1600
Graphics Card
ATI X1300
Hard Drive
WD Velociraptors RAID 0
Power Supply
Corsair 850HX
Case
Lian Li V2010
CPU cooling
Stinger V8
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Win XP SP3
Monitor
Acer X203w
Bleached is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #44 (permalink)
Folding Fanatic
 
cometman's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas, DFW
Posts: 1,108

Rep: 52 cometman is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 41
Trader Rating: 13
Default

Just my 2 cents here...Me and my friend tested a 48702 x2 and gtx 295 on the exact same system..DFI p45 Chipset, QX6850,6gb 6400 DDR2...

Are results showed the GTX 295 with 19500 and the 4870x2 at 13500..
A 6000 POINT SPREAD


Granted we did have physx on, but this is still hats off to nvidia for the perfomance (even if it does not always reflect real world results)

It is really hard to find a review site that is not 'financially biased' as so well put earlier...
Cards will perform different /better/worse on different setups PERIOD. You really cant blame hardware manufacturers for sending the equipment to benchmark it on. This is what the tested it on in the labs showing the most promising results, the fruits of their yileld if you may..Good input and words Grimlar but I can definanlty assure you that your results can Totally be flipped around on a different setup..Favoring the GTX295 , or the 4870x2. It all depends on the build.

System: Xena Tower
CPU
Core i7 920 D0
Motherboard
Asus Rampage Extreme 2
Memory
OCZ 6gb 1600mhz
Graphics Card
eVGA GTX 295
Hard Drive
OS-75gb Raptor | 320 WD
Sound Card
Creative X-fi
Power Supply
Blackwidow 850w Modular
Case
Thermaltake Armor Mod
CPU cooling
Megahalem Sctye UltraKaze
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate 64 Bit
Monitor
40" Samsung 1080p 25000:1
cometman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #45 (permalink)
I am the justice, not you
 
aaronman's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,871

Rep: 292 aaronman is a proven memberaaronman is a proven memberaaronman is a proven member
Unique Rep: 233
Folding Team Rank: 1235
Hardware Reviews: 2
Trader Rating: 2
Default

I get how they can hype one card more than the other but... frames per second are frames per second and there's no way you can be biased about that unless you're flat out lying and making up numbers. Are you claiming that all these review sites do that?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrwesth View Post
Connery was the best. He set our expectations of what a bond should be. It's like comparing all future girlfriends too your first... only your first is Jessica Alba and only dating ugly chicks after her.
Click here to see who is a killjoy and who isn't.
Own a Volkswagen? Well then put a picture of your VW up!!!

Fat lions... apparently they're against the new revised ToS that we haven't seen yet.

September 1st, 2009 and forward: Serious business.

System: Enrique v2.0
CPU
Phenom II 940 Black
Motherboard
DFI LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH
Memory
2x1GB DDR2-800 OCZ SLI
Graphics Card
EVGA 8800GT (680/990)
Hard Drive
4x Seagate 250GB 7200.10 (2 500GB RAID0 arrays)
Sound Card
Auzentech Prelude
Power Supply
Mushkin Modular 550w
Case
Antec Plus View
CPU cooling
Lapped Big Typhoon
GPU cooling
GTS Dual Slot cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Pro
Monitor
2x hp 20" w2007
aaronman is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account aaronman's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #46 (permalink)
Grumpy
 
amd ati

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boulder
Posts: 4,514

Rep: 378 joemaniaci is a proven memberjoemaniaci is a proven memberjoemaniaci is a proven memberjoemaniaci is a proven member
Unique Rep: 280
Hardware Reviews: 1
Trader Rating: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by happyxix View Post
Robilar is just another review in the pool and does not mean his word is law cause he does not have sponsors.
I would find it easier to believe someone without the conflict of interests due to having to do what your sponsors tell you to.

Reviewer: "Hey your card didnt do so well!"

Company: "I dont think so, it will do better, otherwise you can kiss all this free hardware goodbye"

Reviewer: "Oh hey, a 10 fps increase, where did that come from!"
__________________
IF YOU ARE DISGUSTED WITH MY AVATAR, GO TO THE RANTS AND RAVES SECTION AND CHOOSE ONE OF FIVE LESS DISGUSTING BUT STILL DISTASTEFUL CHOICES LINK

The Guess What joemaniaci Is Going to Do Next ThreadThe T-Shirt Thread

unknown person 2-9/1/9-We will never forget

System: I Love Cheese
CPU
Phenom II X3 720
Motherboard
Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Memory
2x2 DDR-800
Graphics Card
MSI 4870 1 Gig + XFX 4870 1 Gig
Hard Drive
WD 250gb + 300gb
Sound Card
On-Board
Power Supply
CM 750 Watt
Case
Rocketfish
OS
Vista Ultimate 64-bit
Monitor
22" Westinghouse
joemaniaci is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #47 (permalink)
The Dark Passenger
 
Robilar's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 13,177

FAQs Submitted: 1
Hardware Reviews: 6
Trader Rating: 56
Default

Aaronman, how can we prove that?

As many people posted earlier in this thread, there are so many variables to benching that there is no real suprise that results are inconsistent.

If the review sites fudge numbers, who is going to call them on it? the Better Business Bureau?

I don't think so...

That is why sites like OCN offer the best chance of impartiality.

On this site we buy our own hardware and expect the best performance out of it.

One thing I see here occasionally though is what I call buyer justification.

A member spends some major coin on the latest and greatest and then feels obligated to defend it as he wrongfully assumes that the rest of us will think he's an idiot for blowing so much money when he finds out it's not what its cracked up to be.

I was the first here to admit that spending just under $1200 on a pair of GTX295 ended up being not only a waste but also did not live up to the hype generated by the review sites.

No one here criticized me. The worst I got was "That blows mate..."
__________________
System: It slices, It dices, It puree's...
CPU
Intel i920 (3845B026) D0 @ 4Ghz, 1.18 Vcore
Motherboard
Asus P6T Deluxe V2 (0610 bios)
Memory
G.Skill F3-12800CL8T-6GB-PI
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD5870
Hard Drive
WD Velociraptor 150 GB
Sound Card
X-FI Gamer
Power Supply
Corsair HX 1000W
Case
CM Storm Sniper Black Edition
CPU cooling
Lapped TRUE w/2 - Ultra Kaze 3K Push - Pull
OS
XP Pro 64 Bit SP2
Monitor
Samsung 2443-BW HAS

Last edited by Robilar : 04-29-09 at 01:41 AM
Robilar is online now Overclocked Account Robilar's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #48 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
OpTicaL's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,697

Rep: 156 OpTicaL is acknowledged by manyOpTicaL is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 123
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_bowtie View Post
this couldnt be farther from the truth and is completely wrong...if you look back on the site last year at this time they were praising ATI when the 4870 was the top dog....this site isnt financially motivated by ANY supplier...their parts are funded by the site owner Neoseeker....
And who is Neoseeker taking money from? Anyone who wants to give it to him. It's called gratitude, similiar to tips, if a customer left me a fat tip for my services you can be sure the next time he/she comes in he/she will get better service and priority over the other customers. That's how society works.

So what if they wrote a review praising ATI last year? just like you said, it was LAST year and last year when the 4870 was shining ATI was throwing money at them and THIS year it's nVidia who's coughing up the dough. Think outside the box..

Quote:
Originally Posted by joemaniaci View Post
I would find it easier to believe someone without the conflict of interests due to having to do what your sponsors tell you to.

Reviewer: "Hey your card didnt do so well!"

Company: "I dont think so, it will do better, otherwise you can kiss all this free hardware goodbye"

Reviewer: "Oh hey, a 10 fps increase, where did that come from!"
Exactly. Review sites don't need to falsify information. All they need to do is exclude certain cards from the rival company in their benchmarks and make the sponser company's card shine.

*edit* here's a prime example on how so-called "review sites" bias their sponser's card over the rival cards: 4890 vs GTX 275

Notice how 95% of the time nVidia is on top. Also notice how they have a SLI GTX285 graph but not a 4870X2 in CrossFire, so much for apples to apples. That being said, the data "maybe" true but it's not hard to manipulate the data to make it appear that nVidia is superior to ATI. Afterall it's a fierce market out there and companies will do whatever it takes to stay on top or keep others at the bottom.
__________________
Click below to show/hide Hidden Text Below!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
This is a false rumour and will NOT happen. Why do people keep spreading these? Sony's investors will not under any circumstance allow for a price drop in 2009. It is a fact. FACT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
In 6 months, when it's 2010, and the price of the PS3 hasn't dropped, I'll be resurrecting this topic to make sure everyone realizes I was right all along. You people are so gullible and stupid, believing a no-name market "analyst" over top of investor reports that are legal documents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by saulin View Post
you can't break the walls without PhysX.

System: Silence is Golden
CPU
Wolfdale E8600 (OC 4.0GHz)
Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-EP45T-UD3P
Memory
4GB G.SKILL DDR3 1800 (PC3 14400)
Graphics Card
Sapphire 4870 1GB
Hard Drive
300GB Velociraptor in RAID0, 2x Hitachi 2TB
Sound Card
X-Fi Fatality
Power Supply
CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX
Case
Lian-Li PC-V2110
CPU cooling
Zalman 9700
GPU cooling
Scythe Musashi (2x 100mm 58CFM Scythe fans)
OS
Vista Ultimate SP1 64-bit/XP Pro SP3
Monitor
Samsung 226BW

Last edited by OpTicaL : 04-29-09 at 01:59 AM
OpTicaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #49 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
mcrbradbury's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 35

Rep: 0 mcrbradbury Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

GO THE GREEN TEAM!
whoo!
always have loved nvidia because of there PhysX processing.
don't mind the extra price.
nice news too!
__________________
System: My First
CPU
Intel E8500 OC= 3.6Ghz
Motherboard
EVGA 780i SLI FTW
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Reapers
Graphics Card
GeForce 9800Gx2
Hard Drive
250GB + 160GB
Power Supply
Corsair 750W
Case
Antec 900
CPU cooling
Something with lights.
OS
XP Home
Monitor
24" and 17"
mcrbradbury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-09   #50 (permalink)
Zombie Assassin
 
iandh's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,541

Rep: 494 iandh is a proven memberiandh is a proven memberiandh is a proven memberiandh is a proven memberiandh is a proven member
Unique Rep: 329
Trader Rating: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robilar View Post
Aaronman, how can we prove that?

As many people posted earlier in this thread, there are so many variables to benching that there is no real suprise that results are inconsistent.

If the review sites fudge numbers, who is going to call them on it? the Better Business Bureau?

I don't think so...

That is why sites like OCN offer the best chance of impartiality.

On this site we buy our own hardware and expect the best performance out of it.

One thing I see here occasionally though is what I call buyer justification.

A member spends some major coin on the latest and greatest and then feels obligated to defend it as he wrongfully assumes that the rest of us will think he's an idiot for blowing so much money when he finds out it's not what its cracked up to be.

I was the first here to admit that spending just under $1200 on a pair of GTX295 ended up being not only a waste but also did not live up to the hype generated by the review sites.

No one here criticized me. The worst I got was "That blows mate..."
I have a couple contacts that know for a fact some review sites are basically "payola based" as far as the songs they play regarding companies GPU's. To my knowledge, [H] is the only site with the nuts to admit they've been pressured to skew results.

Also, there are many ways to bork tests, both intentional and unintentional... changing PCI-E freq., fiddling ram timings, disabling CPU cores, running background programs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 003 View Post
Rob, I saw an article a while back, I believe it was on Tom's Hardware, although I could be wrong. Basically, it found that there seems to be some kind of performance problem with nvidia GT200 based cards on the i7 platform, and that they will get outperformed by ATI/AMD alternatives which would previously have been much faster on Core 2.

I have been trying to locate this for a while now and it's driving me nuts because I can't find it. Although, I believe it holds a lot of credibility because I do not believe that my GTX280 SLI setup is performing to it's best. There is some flaw in nvidia programming on i7.

I want to see a good multi GPU comparison on a high clocked yorkfield system, it would be really interesting...
I read the same thing, I can't find it right now either, this is a pretty major deal too since many folks running high end multi GPU systems also are probably going to be running i7.
__________________
System: Microbeast
CPU
i5-750
Motherboard
Gigabyte P55-UD2
Memory
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1600 CL7
Graphics Card
XFX 5850 1Gb
Hard Drive
Samsung F3 500Gb RAID0 SS
Sound Card
X-Fi Xtremegamer
Power Supply
Seasonic SS-500ET
Case
Antec NSK3480
CPU cooling
AC Alpine 11 Pro
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium
Monitor
Dell s2409w

Last edited by iandh : 04-29-09 at 02:18 AM
iandh is online now Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17330 seconds with 9 queries