Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-09   #51 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel ati

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,826

Rep: 119 Kuntz is acknowledged by manyKuntz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 91
Trader Rating: 0
Default

SSD's will never be as cheap or effective as HDD's, they just take too much space to store 1 bit versus the HDD. Short-stroke HDD's are still better than SSD's currently too, in terms of access times and bandwidth and cost. SSD's have a looong way to go.
__________________
System: Watercooler
CPU
i7 920 D0 @ 4400MHz [24/7]
Motherboard
X58 Classified
Memory
Dominator GT 1680 [6-6-5-16]
Graphics Card
3870 Toxic
Hard Drive
7200.12 - 500GB [RAID 1]
Sound Card
X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
Power Supply
Corsair HX850W
Case
Silverstone TJ07
CPU cooling
Koolance CPU-350
OS
Windows 7
Monitor
Samsung 2343BWX 2048x1152
Kuntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #52 (permalink)
003
nVidia Enthusiast
 
003's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,703

Rep: 246 003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 184
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
Short-stroke HDD's are still better than SSD's currently too, in terms of access times
No... A good SLC SSD (such as an Intel X25-E 64Gb) absolutely destroys spinning hard drives (short stroked or not) in terms of access time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpTicaL View Post
You're right it's probably a fake Fermi and it's running off a 5870.
I called it!

System: Core i7: Round 2
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus Rampage II Gene
Memory
6x2GB Mushkin 998729
Graphics Card
BFG GTX280 OCX
Hard Drive
2x WD RE3 1TB RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair VX550
Case
HEC 6T10B
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S963
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RTM
Monitor
NEC LCD2490WUXi
003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #53 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
T3h_Ch33z_Muncha's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nig Nig
Posts: 4,540

Rep: 179 T3h_Ch33z_Muncha is acknowledged by manyT3h_Ch33z_Muncha is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 138
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
SSD's will never be as cheap or effective as HDD's, they just take too much space to store 1 bit versus the HDD. Short-stroke HDD's are still better than SSD's currently too, in terms of access times and bandwidth and cost. SSD's have a looong way to go.
Lolwhat! Maybe at the moment SSD's can't compete in pure storage with 2TB hard drives, but you think about the amount of time it has taken to get 2TB. Compare that with the amount of time it's taken for SSD's to get where they are now.

As for short-stroked hard drives, they are still in multiple milliseconds of access time for a random seek. SSD's are measure in fractions of one millisecond.
__________________
Please don't call me Muncha, as cheese is not the only insinuatable munchable object; Ch33z will suffice. Oh, and i almost forgot to express my love for Heru
Planned upgrades (kind of in order): 22" Monitor, Goliathus Omega (mousepad), new chair, Windows 7, CM 690, new desk, Ideazon ZBoard MERC, Sennheiser HD201, bong, DX 11 card(s)+necessary PSU
Epic things happening in 2010: Toy Story 3, new H.I.M album, Supreme Commander 2, MechWarrior, The Elder Scrolls V, Mafia II, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Bioshock 2, Crysis 2, Iron Man 2

System: e5200-e5300. Epic upgrade rofl
CPU
e5300 @ 3.66GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
2x2GB Team Elite 800MHz 1.8v 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
MSI 9600GT 512MB @ 733/1800/1065 (2130)
Hard Drive
WD 3200AAKS
Sound Card
onboard :D
Power Supply
430W Antec Truepower Trio
Case
Thermaltake WingRS 100
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Red Scorpion+Crossbow Backplate
GPU cooling
stock
OS
WinXP Home tweaked and modded
Monitor
BenQ 22" 1080p 40000DCR 5ms
T3h_Ch33z_Muncha is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #54 (permalink)
AMD Overclocker
 
vtech1's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paramus, NJ
Posts: 2,728
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: 101 vtech1 is acknowledged by manyvtech1 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 87
Trader Rating: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Repost... and VelociRaptors are still better performers. I assume these will be 4x500GB platters?
i disagree as my cheetah will kick the raptors butt and i have both the cheetah(15.5k rpm) and the raptor (10k rpm) but there might be some truth to the raptor outperforming the 2tb drive, we will have to wait for the benchmarks

System: Cheetah
CPU
Phenom 9600BE @ 2640Mhz
Motherboard
ASUS M4A78 Plus
Memory
Gskill 8GB 800Mhz
Graphics Card
HIS Radeon HD4870 512MB + eVGA 8800GTS 640MB Physx
Hard Drive
147GB Cheetah 15.5k RPM SAS +74gb Raptor
Sound Card
Sound Blaster X-Fi Extreme
Power Supply
Antec TruePowerTrio 650w
Case
Case? what Case? Who uses a Case?
CPU cooling
Tuniq 120
GPU cooling
Cheap-O Mod
OS
Windows 7 x64/Backtrack 4
Monitor
Samsung SyncMaster 941bw +18.1''CRT
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions
vtech1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #55 (permalink)
2 + 2 = 5
 
DuckieHo's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a Chair.
Posts: 34,849

Rep: 4163 DuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guru
Unique Rep: 1903
Trader Rating: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vtech1 View Post
i disagree as my cheetah will kick the raptors butt and i have both the cheetah(15.5k rpm) and the raptor (10k rpm) but there might be some truth to the raptor outperforming the 2tb drive, we will have to wait for the benchmarks
Disagree about what? I didn't say Raptors... I said VelociRaptor which are 40% faster than your pre-ADFD Raptors.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
SSD's will never be as cheap or effective as HDD's, they just take too much space to store 1 bit versus the HDD. Short-stroke HDD's are still better than SSD's currently too, in terms of access times and bandwidth and cost. SSD's have a looong way to go.
Too much space to store? SSD use microscope NAND gates.

Here's a really rough estimate:
At current tech, they can fit 16GB + controller in a microSD (11x15x1mm=165mm^3). A standard HD is roughly 140x101x20mm=282,800mm^3.

165/16GB=10.3mm^3
282800/2048GB=138mm^3

That means SSD can be at least TEN TIMES more dense than HDD. Double-stacked, triple-stacked, quad-stack Flash memory will allow more storage than HDD in the same form factor.
__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Report, not respond to Spam (7) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular


System: Three Dead Mobos in a Year
CPU
Q6600 (3.4GHz)
Motherboard
EVGA 780i
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Reaper 1096MHz
Graphics Card
GTX260 55nm
Hard Drive
PERC 6/i: 3xRAID0 7200.12 500GB
Sound Card
X-Fi XtremeMusic
Power Supply
Corsair 620HX
Case
Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans]
CPU cooling
FuZion V2 + Quad-Heatercore
GPU cooling
EK Block + DDC-3.2
OS
Vista Ultimate 64
Monitor
Samsung 226BW "C" + Sceptre 19"

Last edited by DuckieHo : 07-06-09 at 04:51 AM
DuckieHo is offline Overclocked Account DuckieHo's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #56 (permalink)
pez
PC Gamer
 
pez's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,315

Rep: 179 pez is acknowledged by manypez is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 137
Trader Rating: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Do you understand how hard drives or benchmark works? Did you use the exact same hard drive to compare 16MB and 32MB cache? Did you? Hmmmmmmmmmm!?!?!?!?!? Off the top of my head, there was only one series that had a 32MB and 16MB of the same exact drive.... 7200.10.
Yep I'm sorry that's slightly disappointing to you?
__________________
Cooler Master Storm Sniper on the way!

Review/Comparison: AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE vs. AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE

3DMark06: 16685
3DMark Vantage: 10149

System: Anna Lucia
CPU
AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE Deneb [3.53GHz]
Motherboard
Gigabyte MA770-UD3
Memory
G.SKILL 2x2GB DDR2 1008
Graphics Card
Visiontek HD 4870 512MB [790/1100]
Hard Drive
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music
Power Supply
Antec EA650W
Case
Antec P180 (Cm Storm Sniper OTW :D)
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S1283+Yate Loon D12SH-12
OS
Vista 7 Professional [x64]
Monitor
Acer X223Wbd [22"]
pez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #57 (permalink)
2 + 2 = 5
 
DuckieHo's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a Chair.
Posts: 34,849

Rep: 4163 DuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guru
Unique Rep: 1903
Trader Rating: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pez View Post
Yep I'm sorry that's slightly disappointing to you?
Then how can you possibly claim cache made your new drive perform better? Have you stop to consider the data density, platter count, firmware, and/or controller may have an impact on the performance?

It's like claiming your new car goes so much faster than your old car due to a spoiler. You are ignoring the fact that your old car was an Accord and your new car is a Porsche.
__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Report, not respond to Spam (7) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular


System: Three Dead Mobos in a Year
CPU
Q6600 (3.4GHz)
Motherboard
EVGA 780i
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Reaper 1096MHz
Graphics Card
GTX260 55nm
Hard Drive
PERC 6/i: 3xRAID0 7200.12 500GB
Sound Card
X-Fi XtremeMusic
Power Supply
Corsair 620HX
Case
Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans]
CPU cooling
FuZion V2 + Quad-Heatercore
GPU cooling
EK Block + DDC-3.2
OS
Vista Ultimate 64
Monitor
Samsung 226BW "C" + Sceptre 19"
DuckieHo is offline Overclocked Account DuckieHo's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #58 (permalink)
pez
PC Gamer
 
pez's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,315

Rep: 179 pez is acknowledged by manypez is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 137
Trader Rating: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Then how can you possibly claim cache made your new drive perform better? Have you stop to consider the data density, platter count, firmware, and/or controller may have an impact on the performance?

It's like claiming your new car goes so much faster than your old car due to a spoiler. You are ignoring the fact that your old car was an Accord and your new car is a Porsche.
You must've misunderstood me slightly, but I have no need to explain myself as that analogy had nothing to do with what I was speaking of. The 7200.12 Seagate drives have a 16mb and 32mb cache version.
__________________
Cooler Master Storm Sniper on the way!

Review/Comparison: AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE vs. AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE

3DMark06: 16685
3DMark Vantage: 10149

System: Anna Lucia
CPU
AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE Deneb [3.53GHz]
Motherboard
Gigabyte MA770-UD3
Memory
G.SKILL 2x2GB DDR2 1008
Graphics Card
Visiontek HD 4870 512MB [790/1100]
Hard Drive
Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music
Power Supply
Antec EA650W
Case
Antec P180 (Cm Storm Sniper OTW :D)
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S1283+Yate Loon D12SH-12
OS
Vista 7 Professional [x64]
Monitor
Acer X223Wbd [22"]
pez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #59 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel ati

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,826

Rep: 119 Kuntz is acknowledged by manyKuntz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 91
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 003 View Post
No... A good SLC SSD (such as an Intel X25-E 64Gb) absolutely destroys spinning hard drives (short stroked or not) in terms of access time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3h_Ch33z_Muncha View Post
Lolwhat! Maybe at the moment SSD's can't compete in pure storage with 2TB hard drives, but you think about the amount of time it has taken to get 2TB. Compare that with the amount of time it's taken for SSD's to get where they are now.

As for short-stroked hard drives, they are still in multiple milliseconds of access time for a random seek. SSD's are measure in fractions of one millisecond.
My bad. I guess my info is outdated

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Too much space to store? SSD use microscope NAND gates.

Here's a really rough estimate:
At current tech, they can fit 16GB + controller in a microSD (11x15x1mm=165mm^3). A standard HD is roughly 140x101x20mm=282,800mm^3.

165/16GB=10.3mm^3
282800/2048GB=138mm^3

That means SSD can be at least TEN TIMES more dense than HDD. Double-stacked, triple-stacked, quad-stack Flash memory will allow more storage than HDD in the same form factor.
So in your opinion, SSD would eventually overtake HDD's in capacity? I thought I read somewhere the downside to SSD was that it took 12 gates to store 1 bit?!

edit-From Wikipedia:

"Capacity: As of 2008, far lower than that of conventional hard drives (Flash SSD capacity is predicted to increase rapidly, with experimental drives of 1 TB,[30][31] but hard drive capacity also continues to expand, and hard drives are likely to maintain their capacity edge for some time).[32]
Lower storage density: Hard disks can store more data per unit volume than DRAM or flash SSDs, except for very low capacity/small devices.
"

I read some article on this site awhile ago, I would like to find it again. I'm all for new tech, but it sort of debunked some myths and hype around SSD's.
__________________
System: Watercooler
CPU
i7 920 D0 @ 4400MHz [24/7]
Motherboard
X58 Classified
Memory
Dominator GT 1680 [6-6-5-16]
Graphics Card
3870 Toxic
Hard Drive
7200.12 - 500GB [RAID 1]
Sound Card
X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
Power Supply
Corsair HX850W
Case
Silverstone TJ07
CPU cooling
Koolance CPU-350
OS
Windows 7
Monitor
Samsung 2343BWX 2048x1152
Kuntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-09   #60 (permalink)
2 + 2 = 5
 
DuckieHo's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a Chair.
Posts: 34,849

Rep: 4163 DuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guruDuckieHo is a guru
Unique Rep: 1903
Trader Rating: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pez View Post
You must've misunderstood me slightly, but I have no need to explain myself as that analogy had nothing to do with what I was speaking of.




Quote:
Originally Posted by pez View Post
I definitely saw a big difference going from a 16mb drive to a 32mb drive. Of course I'm sure someone will criticize me with nonsense, but my experience is something that no one can recreate, so bleh. Also the difference going from SATA150 to SATA3GB/s was a nice leap.
This is what I had issue with:
1) There shouldn't be any noticable difference between cache of the same drive
2) This is computers. Anyone can recreate your experience with hardware
3) SATA 1.5Gb/s to SATA 3Gb/s has absolutely no effect on performance what-so-ever... unless you have a SSD.

I hate hate hate the spread of misinformation.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pez View Post
The 7200.12 Seagate drives have a 16mb and 32mb cache version.
Again... you can not compare cache performance without isolating data density, platter count, controller/firmware:

7200.12 160GB 8MB = 1x160GB platter
7200.12 250GB 8MB = 1x250GB platter
7200.12 320GB 16MB = 2x160GB platters
7200.12 500GB 16MB = 1x500GB platter
7200.12 750GB 32MB = 3x250GB platters
7200.12 1TB 32MB = 2x500GB platters


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuntz View Post
So in your opinion, SSD would eventually overtake HDD's in capacity? I thought I read somewhere the downside to SSD was that it took 12 gates to store 1 bit?!

edit-From Wikipedia:

"Capacity: As of 2008, far lower than that of conventional hard drives (Flash SSD capacity is predicted to increase rapidly, with experimental drives of 1 TB,[30][31] but hard drive capacity also continues to expand, and hard drives are likely to maintain their capacity edge for some time).[32]
Lower storage density: Hard disks can store more data per unit volume than DRAM or flash SSDs, except for very low capacity/small devices.
"

I read some article on this site awhile ago, I would like to find it again. I'm all for new tech, but it sort of debunked some myths and hype around SSD's.
How big is each gate?

Quote:
Hard disks can store more data per unit volume than DRAM or flash SSDs, except for very low capacity/small devices.
I don't quite get this... if smaller devices can are more data dense then why isn't it possible for larger devices to continue to be as data dense. Memory ICs scale extremely well. Current cost make it too expensive to scale up but the possiblity is there if the costs of memory modules go down. I believe a 32GB microSD module was just developed. It would just be too expensive to jam 64 32GB ICs onto a PCB + controller + RAM but it is possible. The size of such a unit would be smaller than a 3.5" hard drive.
__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Report, not respond to Spam (7) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular


System: Three Dead Mobos in a Year
CPU
Q6600 (3.4GHz)
Motherboard
EVGA 780i
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Reaper 1096MHz
Graphics Card
GTX260 55nm
Hard Drive
PERC 6/i: 3xRAID0 7200.12 500GB
Sound Card
X-Fi XtremeMusic
Power Supply
Corsair 620HX
Case
Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans]
CPU cooling
FuZion V2 + Quad-Heatercore
GPU cooling
EK Block + DDC-3.2
OS
Vista Ultimate 64
Monitor
Samsung 226BW "C" + Sceptre 19"

Last edited by DuckieHo : 07-06-09 at 12:50 PM
DuckieHo is offline Overclocked Account DuckieHo's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17567 seconds with 8 queries