Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-11-09   #101 (permalink)
Mobo Master
 
Shift.'s Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Sunshine State
Posts: 1,733

Rep: 184 Shift. is acknowledged by manyShift. is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 142
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I've owned Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, MSI, and Soyo motherboards in the past, and I'm seriously contemplating going back to Asus.

The M2N32 SLI Deluxe has been the best $220 I have ever spent on a motherboard. Running just as strong as the day I got it, whilst I've had to RMA multiple Gigabytes, and my DFI is giving me an extremely hard time.

Although Gigabyte is still my go-to brand for awesome budget boards.

And no, I don't think their baby blue motherboards are in any way "girly." I'd still go with the black pcb, but that's just me.

System: six|speed
CPU
X3 710 CACZC | 3.7GHz
Motherboard
DFI LP DK 790GX-M2RS
Memory
4GB OCZ XTC @ 800MHz 2.08v
Graphics Card
XFX|9800GT 600/1800
Hard Drive
Western Digital 6400AAKS
Sound Card
Audigy 2 ZS [ X-Fi Mod ]
Power Supply
Corsair HX620
Case
Antec Nine Hundred
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S1283
GPU cooling
XFX single-slot HSF
OS
Vista Ultimate 64-Bit
Monitor
20" Acer AL2017
Shift. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #102 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Brutuz's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Or-Stray-la
Posts: 4,728
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: 130 Brutuz is acknowledged by manyBrutuz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 110
Folding Team Rank: 203
Hardware Reviews: 6
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 45nm View Post
You have no right to compare prices because you are located in Australia. Upon launch of the X58 motherboards the RIIE was approximately 489 CAD whereas the EX58 Extreme was 428 CAD (in that price range). It's also well known that most of the world records were held by the Rampage II Extreme. The ASUS board has a friendlier and more diverse BIOS , superior RMA policy (ROG/High-End motherboards), Higher phase count (16 vs 12), better NB/SB cooling , better layout , excellent bundle, frequent BIOS updates etc.... You are biased merely because of bad experiences with 'budget' motherboards.
Why does my location take my right to compare prices? It'd be like me saying "You have a Core i7, you're not allowed to say which motherboard is better!"

Superior RMA policy? Then why did my friends Striker Extreme die and ASUS just stop replying to his RMA requests when he was on his 4th one?

Better cooling my left buttcheek, the Gigabyte has that huge heatsink that would at least match the ASUS's one, Gigabyte gets frequent BIOS updates too and a better bundle than the ASUS board.

Phase count and layout are better in the ASUS, but is that worth AU$170?

Also, if I'm biased, then why am I probably getting a ASUS P6T when I go Core i7? It's the best in my price range, I go for what is best for my usage and price, so what if I think Gigabyte is better, I'll try the ASUS and if they screw up yet again, I'll just sell the board and go back to Gigabyte or someone else.
__________________
AUSSIE OCN CLUB | 8 Gigs of RAM Club | CM 690 Club
"Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = FUD = Fudzilla" - Danylu in a MSN Chat
I am not a fanboy, I have a Core 2 Duo E8300 and Pentium Dual Core E2180 as well as the CPU in my sig rig, I also have multiple nVidia cards (6800GS, 9400GT, 9600GT) as well as two ATI. (HD4890 + HD2400Pro)
Using my backup rig for nostalgia factor.
I'm boycotting any games made by Activision until Kotick says bye bye.

System: Backup rig.
CPU
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton
Motherboard
Rebranded Gigabyte VIA KT600 motherboard
Memory
1Gb DDR400 CL2.5
Graphics Card
nVidia TNT2 16Mb AGP
Hard Drive
120Gb Laptop HDD
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
400w nobrand from 2004
Case
Coolermaster Centurion 5
CPU cooling
Stock with a better fan
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows XP nLited SP3
Monitor
19" LCD
1 Million+ Folding at Home points
Brutuz is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #103 (permalink)
Over 9000.
 
ChielScape's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 9,118

Rep: 671 ChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 462
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz View Post
Why does my location take my right to compare prices? It'd be like me saying "You have a Core i7, you're not allowed to say which motherboard is better!"

Superior RMA policy? Then why did my friends Striker Extreme die and ASUS just stop replying to his RMA requests when he was on his 4th one?

Better cooling my left buttcheek, the Gigabyte has that huge heatsink that would at least match the ASUS's one, Gigabyte gets frequent BIOS updates too and a better bundle than the ASUS board.

Phase count and layout are better in the ASUS, but is that worth AU$170?

Also, if I'm biased, then why am I probably getting a ASUS P6T when I go Core i7? It's the best in my price range, I go for what is best for my usage and price, so what if I think Gigabyte is better, I'll try the ASUS and if they screw up yet again, I'll just sell the board and go back to Gigabyte or someone else.
better cooling yeah. ASUS board allows for the installation of a waterblock that ISNT made of aluminum, and unlike gigabyte's coolers doesnt rest on an array of fins.

heat first has to pass trough an array of fins before it can go anywhere... a thick piece of copper is already an insulator, but fins are even worse. the air between them doesnt transfer any heat at all, and tehre is virtually no surface area in the copper to do so either. so no, its cooling doesnt even come close to that of the ASUS boards. this GB crap just looks really nice. that's all.

they actually pull that stunt twice in this pic, the heatsink that goes out the PCI slot is also connected only to an array of fins, and is therefore more of a waste of space than it helps cooling. which it doesnt. FAIL.
and take a look at that heatsink itself... the heatpipes touch only half of the fins... even if heat would miraculously reach that heatink, half the fins arent doing anythin...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrongmanSal View Post
^^^^^ this dude right here ^^^^^^^^ is one true badass.

Last edited by ChielScape : 07-12-09 at 05:55 AM
ChielScape is online now Overclocked Account ChielScape's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #104 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Brutuz's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Or-Stray-la
Posts: 4,728
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: 130 Brutuz is acknowledged by manyBrutuz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 110
Folding Team Rank: 203
Hardware Reviews: 6
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChielScape View Post
better cooling yeah. ASUS board allows for the installation of a waterblock that ISNT made of aluminum, and unlike gigabyte's coolers doesnt rest on an array of fins.

heat first has to pass trough an array of fins before it can go anywhere... a thick piece of copper is already an insulator, but fins are even worse. the air between them doesnt transfer any heat at all, and tehre is virtually no surface area in the copper to do so either. so no, its cooling doesnt even come close to that of the ASUS boards. this GB crap just looks really nice. that's all.

they actually pull that stunt twice in this pic, the heatsink that goes out the PCI slot is also connected only to an array of fins, and is therefore more of a waste of space than it helps cooling. which it doesnt. FAIL.
and take a look at that heatsink itself... the heatpipes touch only half of the fins... even if heat would miraculously reach that heatink, half the fins arent doing anythin...
[/IMG]http://www.gigabyte.fr/FileList/Image/motherboard_productimage_ga-ex58-extreme-4_big.jpg[/IMG]
Technically, any board does if you remove the original heatsinks, etc, so that first point is moot.

Second, what about highly successful coolers like the Accelero S1? The heatpipes don't hit much of the fins, but I know on mine if its doing a 511 point WU, I can feel the heat spread evenly minus where the fans are.

While it might not remove all of the heat, the heat that doesn't get removed from that heatsink or from the copper block will probably go to warm up other spots, which means those heatpipes and heatsink, but I don't know if that will work, still... What happened to 45nms "You only need a small heatsink?"

Still, the Gigabyte one doesn't have a heat source (Light) on their thing designed to remove heat from the NB/MOSFETs...
__________________
AUSSIE OCN CLUB | 8 Gigs of RAM Club | CM 690 Club
"Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = FUD = Fudzilla" - Danylu in a MSN Chat
I am not a fanboy, I have a Core 2 Duo E8300 and Pentium Dual Core E2180 as well as the CPU in my sig rig, I also have multiple nVidia cards (6800GS, 9400GT, 9600GT) as well as two ATI. (HD4890 + HD2400Pro)
Using my backup rig for nostalgia factor.
I'm boycotting any games made by Activision until Kotick says bye bye.

System: Backup rig.
CPU
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton
Motherboard
Rebranded Gigabyte VIA KT600 motherboard
Memory
1Gb DDR400 CL2.5
Graphics Card
nVidia TNT2 16Mb AGP
Hard Drive
120Gb Laptop HDD
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
400w nobrand from 2004
Case
Coolermaster Centurion 5
CPU cooling
Stock with a better fan
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows XP nLited SP3
Monitor
19" LCD
1 Million+ Folding at Home points
Brutuz is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #105 (permalink)
Over 9000.
 
ChielScape's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 9,118

Rep: 671 ChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 462
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz View Post
Technically, any board does if you remove the original heatsinks, etc, so that first point is moot.

Second, what about highly successful coolers like the Accelero S1? The heatpipes don't hit much of the fins, but I know on mine if its doing a 511 point WU, I can feel the heat spread evenly minus where the fans are.

While it might not remove all of the heat, the heat that doesn't get removed from that heatsink or from the copper block will probably go to warm up other spots, which means those heatpipes and heatsink, but I don't know if that will work, still... What happened to 45nms "You only need a small heatsink?"

Still, the Gigabyte one doesn't have a heat source (Light) on their thing designed to remove heat from the NB/MOSFETs...
no, the point is not moot. its the difference between a single block that can cool the entire motherboard trough the already present heatpipe system, which is decent in ASUS's case, versus having to buy seperate blocks for all individual chips and FET-banks.

the difference between that and the accellero, as that all the fins on your cooler have a heatpipe touching them. while on the GB cooler, some fins are just sitting there. whether or not the heatpipe is completely covered isnt nearly as important as whether or not all the fins have a pipe touching them.

and you still do need only a small heatsink.. thing is, GB's thing is possibly even worse. a heatsink isnt about the most fins or heatpipes alone... they can help to achieve it, but whats really important is a low C/W value... thermal resistance. a thin sheeth of metal has a tremendous resistance when transferring heat from one edge to another, but its very low when you go trough normal to the large surface. GB does it just the wrong way, the heat has a large barrier to pass in the form of the fin array below the actual heatsink. which results in a large difference in temperature between the chip and the actual heatsink... a high resistance to heat, a high C/W and therefore a failure as a cooler as a result.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrongmanSal View Post
^^^^^ this dude right here ^^^^^^^^ is one true badass.
ChielScape is online now Overclocked Account ChielScape's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #106 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Brutuz's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Or-Stray-la
Posts: 4,728
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: 130 Brutuz is acknowledged by manyBrutuz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 110
Folding Team Rank: 203
Hardware Reviews: 6
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChielScape View Post
no, the point is not moot. its the difference between a single block that can cool the entire motherboard trough the already present heatpipe system, which is decent in ASUS's case, versus having to buy seperate blocks for all individual chips and FET-banks.

the difference between that and the accellero, as that all the fins on your cooler have a heatpipe touching them. while on the GB cooler, some fins are just sitting there. whether or not the heatpipe is completely covered isnt nearly as important as whether or not all the fins have a pipe touching them.

and you still do need only a small heatsink.. thing is, GB's thing is possibly even worse. a heatsink isnt about the most fins or heatpipes alone... they can help to achieve it, but whats really important is a low C/W value... thermal resistance. a thin sheeth of metal has a tremendous resistance when transferring heat from one edge to another, but its very low when you go trough normal to the large surface. GB does it just the wrong way, the heat has a large barrier to pass in the form of the fin array below the actual heatsink. which results in a large difference in temperature between the chip and the actual heatsink... a high resistance to heat, a high C/W and therefore a failure as a cooler as a result.
Yes, it is, if you want good cooling, you'd be better off getting blocks for the MOSFETs and SB as well instead of mounting on what is essentially a extra thick IHS.

True, but wouldn't they be soldered on? How can you tell if they are or aren't?

If its a failure of a cooler, then why can't I see anyone complaining about it/the motherboard? Granted, I can't find any complaints about the Rampage II Extreme either, obviously both cool well enough, granted, anything that isn't flagship from ASUS usually has a tiny heatsink that cools like a hotdog would.
__________________
AUSSIE OCN CLUB | 8 Gigs of RAM Club | CM 690 Club
"Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = FUD = Fudzilla" - Danylu in a MSN Chat
I am not a fanboy, I have a Core 2 Duo E8300 and Pentium Dual Core E2180 as well as the CPU in my sig rig, I also have multiple nVidia cards (6800GS, 9400GT, 9600GT) as well as two ATI. (HD4890 + HD2400Pro)
Using my backup rig for nostalgia factor.
I'm boycotting any games made by Activision until Kotick says bye bye.

System: Backup rig.
CPU
AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton
Motherboard
Rebranded Gigabyte VIA KT600 motherboard
Memory
1Gb DDR400 CL2.5
Graphics Card
nVidia TNT2 16Mb AGP
Hard Drive
120Gb Laptop HDD
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
400w nobrand from 2004
Case
Coolermaster Centurion 5
CPU cooling
Stock with a better fan
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows XP nLited SP3
Monitor
19" LCD
1 Million+ Folding at Home points
Brutuz is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #107 (permalink)
Folding Fanatic
 
jamracing's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 318

Rep: 9 jamracing Unknown
Unique Rep: 9
Folding Team Rank: 37
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
I find it funny that Asus is using the same tech and terminology as Gigabyte. Why didn't they do 3oz Copper?
or 12OZ!!! That amount of copper will make the board run at 20 degrees AND compliment you on your complexion
__________________
4.2 Ghz club!
3DMark06-15077!!
Vantage P9356

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duesco
I went from 7057 to 7077...

7057: Like a dream, fast and responsive, smooth and trouble-free.
7077: Crashes at the drop of a hat, freezes, throws up, pees on itself, throws things, chases my cat.

I don't get it.

System: N.A.S.A's nemesis
CPU
E8500@4.2Ghz (1.28v)
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
4GB G.Skill 900 Pi
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD4870 Toxic
Hard Drive
Raptor 150, 2x200GB mirror
Power Supply
Enermax Liberty 620w
Case
Cooler Master Stacker
CPU cooling
OCZ Vendetta 2
GPU cooling
Sapphire
OS
7 Ultimate x64
Monitor
ASUS 22" wide w/camera
4 Million+ Folding at Home points
jamracing is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #108 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
Twin Turbo V8's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 31

Rep: 0 Twin Turbo V8 Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

i say follow the leader??? jk. ive had gigabyte ga-ma78gm-us2h board, it was no cooler than asus or even an intel board. and it died after only 6mths of use.
__________________
System: Dragon Slayer 1, under construction
CPU
AMD Opteron 1216
Motherboard
ASRock LIVE NF6G-VSTA
Memory
2x 2gb OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 800mhz
Graphics Card
XFX 9800gt
Hard Drive
120gb sata11 seagate,320 and 360 gb western digita
Sound Card
Sound Blaster live 24 bit
Power Supply
Logisys 650 watt
Case
custom, clear side, clear top,
CPU cooling
Artic Freezer 64pro
GPU cooling
Stock copper XFX cooler
OS
Windows 7 ultimate 64

Last edited by Twin Turbo V8 : 07-12-09 at 03:16 PM
Twin Turbo V8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #109 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
Twin Turbo V8's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 31

Rep: 0 Twin Turbo V8 Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

hope it isnt true of asrock. (being crap) just bought one to replace the gigabyte. darn,I better do more research next time.
__________________
System: Dragon Slayer 1, under construction
CPU
AMD Opteron 1216
Motherboard
ASRock LIVE NF6G-VSTA
Memory
2x 2gb OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 800mhz
Graphics Card
XFX 9800gt
Hard Drive
120gb sata11 seagate,320 and 360 gb western digita
Sound Card
Sound Blaster live 24 bit
Power Supply
Logisys 650 watt
Case
custom, clear side, clear top,
CPU cooling
Artic Freezer 64pro
GPU cooling
Stock copper XFX cooler
OS
Windows 7 ultimate 64
Twin Turbo V8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-09   #110 (permalink)
Over 9000.
 
ChielScape's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 9,118

Rep: 671 ChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famousChielScape is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 462
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz View Post
Yes, it is, if you want good cooling, you'd be better off getting blocks for the MOSFETs and SB as well instead of mounting on what is essentially a extra thick IHS.

True, but wouldn't they be soldered on? How can you tell if they are or aren't?

If its a failure of a cooler, then why can't I see anyone complaining about it/the motherboard? Granted, I can't find any complaints about the Rampage II Extreme either, obviously both cool well enough, granted, anything that isn't flagship from ASUS usually has a tiny heatsink that cools like a hotdog would.
and that "hotdog" would still cool enough... never heard anyone complaining of those either.

anyway, watercooling a chipset is already a bit like watercooling RAM, overkill... a single waterblock on that heatpipe system will get you great temps already, the seperate blocks arent much of an improvement... chipsets just dont put out that much heat. which is why even GB's coolers suffice... theyre just a huge waste of metal and space.

and i dont follow you on the soldering... if a heatpipe doesnt come anywhere near a particular fin as seen in the picture, it just isnt doing anything, no amount of solder will change that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrongmanSal View Post
^^^^^ this dude right here ^^^^^^^^ is one true badass.
ChielScape is online now Overclocked Account ChielScape's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.20231 seconds with 9 queries