the GT 220 is better than a 9500gt but worse than a 4670 which has been out for over a year. I was hoping the GT220 could be like a low powered 9600gt but it isn't
GT 220 should be much better than any IGP solution since your basically on a 32bit memory bus sharing memory and lanes with the system. With a 220 you have 128 bit which is perfect for gaming at 1280x1024 type resolutions and also its the max an AGP socket can do even though this is PCIE we are talking about.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by h4rdcor3
$100 for a wireless adapter? That's what i spent on my 8800GT
|
CPU
Intel Core 2 e8600 3.33 GHZ |
Motherboard
AsRock P45 TurboTwin |
Memory
4GB (2X2) 1066 OCZ Platinum XTC |
Graphics Card
EVGA 9600GSO (384/192) |
Hard Drive
500GB SATAII Hitachi Deskstar |
Power Supply
Topower-ZU-550 W |
Case
Intel Entry Server Chassis SC5250-E |
OS
Windows 7 x64 |
Monitor
V7 D1711 17' LCD |
|
[HEX] GIGABYTE adds external NVIDIA GeForce graphics to Booktop M1305 notebook
2 Weeks Ago
