|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News | |
[TPU-SA] NVIDIA Shuns Lucid Hydra
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 (permalink) | ||
|
Need a New Protocol
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1093/4/
__________________
I seldom argue my advice, It's free take it or leave it. READ this thread before starting your first build!!! ALWAYS power up a Mobo Before installing it! Consider Less than helpful posts as Free Bumps. ¡¡¡ʍʇɟ qn1ɔ uoıʇɐıɔǝɹddɐ 939 ʇǝʞɔos ǝɥʇ [Official]November Foldathon Retro Rulez![]() This goes without saying but 1. If you can't afford to lose it don't mod or OC it. 2. At least read the OP before commenting. Semper Fi Last edited by Hueristic : 2 Weeks Ago at 06:42 PM |
||
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Console Gamer
![]() |
How can nVidia stop this from releasing? They don't own Lucid technology?... All they can do is block it at the driver level and someone will just hack them.
__________________
Old Dirty Bastard: P4 HT @ 2.8Ghz - 1.5Gb of Kingston ValueRAM - MSI 8500GT - WinXP Pro_SP3 - 19" ProView.
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
News Fiend
![]() |
Both are DX10.
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
can this be cheap for entry/med level mobo to have sli/crossfire
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
CPU-Z Validation & GPU-Z Validation![]() Intel E1xxx/E2xxx Configuration Thread & The 1 Ghz OC Club![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
I don't see the problem in the OP...
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Sweet. I never played a DX 10 game with it and I think it came out before Vista so I thought it wasn't.
However I think Nvidia has not allowed SLI of mixed GPUs to keep bugs and other issues to minimum. Like I said if you look at the release notes for their drivers you will see issues that could be present in Windows Vista but not XP or vice versa. Or issues that could be present with a card but not with another. So I wonder if this new technology goes through how is it supposed to handle this issues without direct support from Nvidia or ATI? Plus wasn't SLI and CF pretty buggy in their early days too? How many people will actually just trust something so new and immature? I think the idea is great if it actually worked like they put it. It would be sweet to use my 8800 GTX together with my GTX 285
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
lol.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Personae Non Gratae
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Yorkshire, England
Posts: 3,617
Rep: 168
![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 126
Trader Rating: 4
|
I fail to see how Nvidia is being greedy. What a set of shortsighted comments.
Intel is holding all the cards and refusing to allow Nvidia access to the new i5 and i7 chipsets. Intels only money in the chipset business comes from SLI chips. Why would they willingly let that revenue slip through their fingers? Really, you can blame Intel for being greedy. If Nvidia were allowed to make i5 and i7 chipsets, they wouldn't need to cling to the nforce 200 chip. Really, does anyone here actually think about things or are we on autopilot whinge mode?
__________________
There's a certain series of books that EVERYONE should read Discworld.31,352++ signatures. Sign this Dedicated Servers petition for Modern Warfare 2 Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Cut costs
![]() |
...P45?
The Atom's 945 express chipset? Agreed
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|