Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel - General > Intel Build Logs

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-18-08   #1 (permalink)
Case Modder
 
MikuMiku's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 28

Rep: 1 MikuMiku Unknown
Unique Rep: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Default need help choosing my CPU

with my setup that i have in my system setup, should i go for the Q6600 and OC it or the Q9300 and OC it. i am not sure and i need help on this subject. please explain why you think ones better than the other too please! if you have any other suggestions that i should consider please suggest away.
__________________
http://www.gamexe.net/signatures/0sig_future.png

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikhsub1
I suppose you use magic to affix your WB to the cpu? Perhaps you have little elves hold the damn things on for you? Or maybe, Ivanka Trump comes and begs you to let her apply 60 lbs of pressure to your WB? No, I bet that Heather Mills lends you her fake leg to wedge the WB into place

System: My System
CPU
Core 2 Quad Q9300 Yorkfield 2.5GHz
Motherboard
EVGA nForce 780i SLI ATX
Memory
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 4GB
Graphics Card
EVGA Nvidia 8800GTS
Hard Drive
Raptor X 150GB
Power Supply
Antec 850W (Truepower Quattro)
Case
COOLER MASTER COSMOS 1000
OS
Windows XP
MikuMiku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #2 (permalink)
nVidia Enthusiast
 
reezin14's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 42* 30'N 89* 2'W
Posts: 1,127

Rep: 123 reezin14 is acknowledged by manyreezin14 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 99
Trader Rating: 2
Default

I too was going to go with the q93 until I really looked at the q66,it has a higher multi and can absorb more Vcore.To get the higher OC's of 3.6+ with the q93 you going to have to go 481 FSB or higher,I've seen some but most are modest OC's of 3.2 to 3.4. The q93 isn't a bad chip but, IMO I think the q66 or q67(x10 multi) is a better choice as of now.

System: Green Lantern
CPU
Q6600(3.0)4 summer
Motherboard
GA-P35-DS3L Rev 2.0
Memory
G.SKILL(2X2GB)1066
Graphics Card
Evga 8800GTS(G92)KO
Hard Drive
Western Digital C 320GB
Sound Card
Sound Blaster 24-bit
Power Supply
Corsair TX650
Case
Velocity
CPU cooling
TRUE/Delta 120x38
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Vista Ultimate 32-bit
Monitor
VeiwSonic "22"
reezin14 is offline reezin14's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #3 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
A Russian :D's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA state
Posts: 2,644

Rep: 216 A Russian :D is acknowledged by manyA Russian :D is acknowledged by manyA Russian :D is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Q6600 or Q6700 FTW
__________________
System: The Russian that could
CPU
Intel Pentium D 820
Motherboard
Asus 945i
Memory
3 gig of ram
Graphics Card
Evga 7950 GT 265 MB
Hard Drive
250
Sound Card
none
Power Supply
400 watt silver stone
Case
HP case
Monitor
17" HP monitor
A Russian :D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #4 (permalink)
nVidia Enthusiast
 
sgdude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,621

Rep: 105 sgdude is acknowledged by manysgdude is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 93
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Q6600. if you are willing to spend what a Q9300 costs, then get a Q6700 for the same price, or spend $60 more for a Q9450. the Q9300 only has 6mb cache and a 7.5x multi=worse than the Q6600. go for the Q6600, Q6700, or Q9450
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillos View Post
"Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this new processor has 12MB of cache. 4x4=12MB."

.

System: My System
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
EVGA 650i Ultra
Memory
4x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400
Graphics Card
EVGA 8800GT 512
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 320 GB 16mb Cache Sata
Sound Card
Sound Blaster Audigy SE 24bit 7.1
Power Supply
Antec True Power Trio 550W
Case
Apevia X-Gear (green)
CPU cooling
Arctic Freezer 7 Pro with MX-1
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Windows Vista Home Premium x64 SP1/Windows XP MCE
Monitor
Samsung 226BW
sgdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #5 (permalink)
Programmer
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 338

Rep: 24 markatto is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 23
Folding Team Rank: 301
Trader Rating: 2
Default

The Q9300 is low on cache and overall just not the best chip ever. If you want a 45nm quad, get a Q9450; Otherwise, just do the Q6600/Q6700 (the newest Q6600s haven't been great overclockers, so i suggest the Q6700)
__________________
*Current 3DMark06 score: 19311*


Looking for:
8600m or better notebook for cheap

System: my baby
CPU
Q6600 G0 @ 3.6
Motherboard
EVGA 780i
Memory
2x 2gb G.Skill PQ DDR2-1000
Graphics Card
2x GTS 512 SLi
Hard Drive
2x raid0 250Gb 7200.10 (16 meg cache)
Power Supply
OCZ GameXStream 700 watt
Case
Cooler Master 690
CPU cooling
D-tek fuzion v.2
GPU cooling
2x Thermaltake DuOrb
OS
XP 64
Monitor
22'' Sceptre
markatto is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #6 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
A Russian :D's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA state
Posts: 2,644

Rep: 216 A Russian :D is acknowledged by manyA Russian :D is acknowledged by manyA Russian :D is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgdude View Post
Q6600. if you are willing to spend what a Q9300 costs, then get a Q6700 for the same price, or spend $60 more for a Q9450. the Q9300 only has 6mb cache and a 7.5x multi=worse than the Q6600. go for the Q6600, Q6700, or Q9450
listen to this guy OP
__________________
System: The Russian that could
CPU
Intel Pentium D 820
Motherboard
Asus 945i
Memory
3 gig of ram
Graphics Card
Evga 7950 GT 265 MB
Hard Drive
250
Sound Card
none
Power Supply
400 watt silver stone
Case
HP case
Monitor
17" HP monitor
A Russian :D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08   #7 (permalink)
Case Modder
 
MikuMiku's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 28

Rep: 1 MikuMiku Unknown
Unique Rep: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Default

yeah thanks guys thats is a world of help 4 me. ill go for the Q6700. the olny reason why i was considering the 93 it because PCG's Builders Bible used that as their CPU. Thanks alot guys this is soo much help!!
__________________
http://www.gamexe.net/signatures/0sig_future.png

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikhsub1
I suppose you use magic to affix your WB to the cpu? Perhaps you have little elves hold the damn things on for you? Or maybe, Ivanka Trump comes and begs you to let her apply 60 lbs of pressure to your WB? No, I bet that Heather Mills lends you her fake leg to wedge the WB into place

System: My System
CPU
Core 2 Quad Q9300 Yorkfield 2.5GHz
Motherboard
EVGA nForce 780i SLI ATX
Memory
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 4GB
Graphics Card
EVGA Nvidia 8800GTS
Hard Drive
Raptor X 150GB
Power Supply
Antec 850W (Truepower Quattro)
Case
COOLER MASTER COSMOS 1000
OS
Windows XP
MikuMiku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-08   #8 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
45nm's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 833

Rep: 22 45nm is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 20
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I would recommend a Q9550.
__________________
System: "Lux Aeterna II" - End of the World Tender #1
CPU
Q9650
Motherboard
Asus Maximus II Formula or Rampage Formula
Memory
G.Skill or Patriot
Graphics Card
2 Sapphire 4870 X2
Hard Drive
Velicoraptor , Seagate Barracuda 1TB
Sound Card
Supreme FX-II X-Fi
Power Supply
Corsair 1000 Watt
Case
Antec Twelve Hundred
CPU cooling
OCZ Vendetta 2
OS
Vista Ultimate 64 bit
45nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License Internet Security By ControlScan

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2008 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.32899 seconds with 9 queries