|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel CPUs | |
Core 2 Line-Up Breakdown
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Minor Bun Engine
|
Intel has been bumping FSB of chips for none other reason than marketing. Fact is, while they're faster at stock, they don't top out as well as the predecessors. Why? I've compiled this list to show you what the non-Extreme CPUs really are, by multipliers.
Dual Core CPUs:
Quad Core CPUs:
As we all know, Intel slaps 2 dual-core dies together and calls it a quad with a new model number. So which quad is which dual? Direct Quad vs Dual Comparison:
So now if you're looking to buy a quad and don't know how it'll overclock, then you can just refer to its dual-core cousin. Please note that quad-core overclocks a bit less than its dual-core equivalent.
__________________
Last edited by NuclearCrap : 02-22-08 at 06:17 AM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
cool I will use this some how
__________________
Last edited by Death Dealer : 02-04-08 at 05:55 AM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
First!
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Minor Bun Engine
|
What the heck......
![]()
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
Quote:
![]()
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
The Q9550 is between the E8200 and E8400 not the E8400 and E8500.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
Fact is, not everyone overclocks. They are bumping the FSB because it increases stock performance for those uncomfortable overclocking. Multipliers aren't everything, the Q6600 is only made by putting two E6600s together, not by putting two E6850s together.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Dont forget the Pentium Dual core series, they are just Core2 with less cache
__________________
E2140 at 3200mhz (100% OC)
http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/...ml#post3361751 4125 3dmark06 (all tests)
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Sweet. Good job with the chart dude.
__________________
3.00 GHz - CPU-Z Validated 3.20 GHz - CPUZ Validated Small Form Factor (SFF) Cases - Because those of you with big towers are compensating for something! Check out my For Sale Thread - LCD monitors, RAM, and assorted other goods!
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Minor Bun Engine
|
Quote:
Even if the user doesn't overclock, you cannot deny that they aren't the same chips on different core revisions. What makes you think I don't know it is to increase stock performance? All I'm saying is that by doing so, they can resell the same thing for more money. I even mentioned it here: Quote:
__________________
Last edited by NuclearCrap : 02-05-08 at 01:03 AM. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|