|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
I have about $400 dollars and I'm looking to buy a new processor and new ram. I have been looking at the E8400, Q6600 and the Q6700. For the ram I was looking at:
__________________http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231145 What would be better for gaming, dual or quad core?
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: saratoga springs,new york
Posts: 724
Rep: 16
![]() Unique Rep: 15
Trader Rating: 0
|
right now dual cores are better because of how easy they overclock. But in the same breath you could get a quad for future proofing and just overclock that. So yeah get the quad.
__________________
Gr33n Machine 15856 3dmark 06 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6887799 8800GT Owners Club!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Aye, I suggest the quad also. I'm happy with mine, and it runs my games fine.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
You break it, I fix it
|
a dual core is better for gamming than a quad core. but if you want to do say game and fold at the same time a quad would be a better choice.
__________________
"noobdown" just another OCN member helping noobs get up to speed Official Cooler Master 690 Club
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
If your gaming get an e8400. They are easier to overclock at higher speeds and many people are able to hit 4.0ghz easily. By the time quads are standard in games there should be better quadcores out.
__________________
Member of the OCN Diablo III Club The Black Mesa Survivors Club Overclock.net Headphone Club: Because perfect hair is overrated.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Ok thanks. I am probably going to go for quad then. What model should I get? Q6700 has a X10 multiplier and a faster stock speed, or should I go for Q6600?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
I would go for quad there the same price.The quad o/c's just about as good as e8400 if you have a good rig,imo
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
I like my dual core. OC'ed pretty easy.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
I just realized that you already have an e6750. Is it holding you back?
__________________
Member of the OCN Diablo III Club The Black Mesa Survivors Club Overclock.net Headphone Club: Because perfect hair is overrated.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
|
I'd say quad. It will save you money in the long run as more games will be coded for quads
__________________
Aumotocnic "An unfortunate member of the overclock.net insomnia club"
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|