|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
hi, i am upgrading my comp
__________________these two are petty same price now.. $380 for QX6850 $394 for Q9550 which is better for me i am gonna use it more than 2 years or wait for price drop?
Last edited by vincentfkc : 09-06-08 at 02:48 AM |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
The QX6850?
__________________your thread title and content don't match, which two chips are you referring to?
Last edited by Robilar : 09-06-08 at 02:37 AM |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
![]() |
Most people would say Q9550 cause it's 45nm, new stepping, better OCing and has newer tech.
I still like the QX6860 though
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
Quote:
There is a QX6850 (65nm) and a QX9650 (45nm), QX9770 as well
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
im sure he means QX6850. its a tough one. the QX6850 should hit 3.8-4ghz with r8 air cooling, and the Q9550 might. the 9550s 5% better clock 4 clock, it really up to u.
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
I think he means the QX6850
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Canadian OCN Club † Mozilla Firefox Club
°°Google Is Your Friend°° "A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure." - Segal's Law
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
Right.
__________________The problem with the QX6850 is that due to its 65nm core, it runs hotter than any other newer chip. Air cooling would be challenged to sustain 4ghz with it. The Q9550 tops out at about 3.8 depending on the motherboard and actually runs cooler (at on par clocks) to the QX. I had both the QX6850 and the QX9650. The QX9650 easily did 4ghz on air. The QX6850, the best I could do with a lapped TRUE was 3.85 or so before temps got out of control.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Cut costs
![]() |
Q9550
More cache, 45nm
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
k Q9550
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|