|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
i told him that, he doesnt even want to try overclocking, not even if I help him do it.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
I ride with no Handlebars
![]() |
Quote:
monthproof
__________________
Miata joking lists: "You Know YOU are a NA Owner when..." Quote:
ive done it lol
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Best bang for a buck is E8400 and bout it for $150 at Microcenter.com. That's what I paid for it in May '08. It was a special advertising though.
__________________
Intel E8400 Club 4850s CF Club 3DMARKS 19545 on Radeon HD 4850's CF Have a good day!
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
PhII hands down
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Get him a decent Q6600 and force him to overclock it.
__________________
CPUZ 24/7 i7 920 CPUZ 24/7 Q6600 Auzentech Prelude > little Dot MK V > Sennheiser HD 650 WTS: Ipod touch 16gb (2g), Dangerden MC-TDX (1366 waterblock), 2x1gb DDR2 sodimm kits, 160gb notebook hard drive (works well with PS3s)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Gunga Lagunga
![]() |
Well, obviously a quad is twice as good as a dual.....
j/k, I prefer quads and I still think the Q6600 is the best bang for your buck. If you are gaming almost exclusively and want that last possible FPS, an E8400 or the like is the best just for the extra clock speed. (I still wouldn't build a new PC with a dual)
__________________
Antec 1000 Case Mod Worklog 3358 Windsor 3800 "[Vietnam] only made billionaires out of millionaires. Today's war is making trillionaires out of billionaires. Now I call that progress." -Kurt Vonnegut
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Monk's FAQ's How to: Stop roll-over triggered Ads in Firefox Info: Nice little program for faster boot and shutdown times Unofficial Dual Monitor Information Thread British Overclockers Club ![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: P-Town, Illinois
Posts: 2,265
Rep: 139
![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 113
Trader Rating: 6
|
I'd go for a quad over dual anyday, unless we're talkin way different clock speeds. If a dual and quad are clocked exactly the same, the quad will ALWAYS perform equal or better than the dual, no exceptions. Now if you're running an app thats only optmized for 2 cores then a higher clocked dual core would slightly outperform a lower clocked quad, but in an app optimized to use 4 cores the lower clocked quad would outperform the dual. The arguement that gets everyone to buy the dual is that "most games don't use 4 cores". Well this is somewhat true, but there are a handful of games currently out that do use all 4 cores, and more and more coming along. Pretty soon dual cores will be out and quads will be the standard, might as well embrace it now.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Oh, whatever he gets, he'll want to overclock it within a month.
__________________
The Ice Stone has melted! I did error10's Windows Challenge and I now am an MCSE: Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert! ![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|