|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel CPUs | |
1.3 VID q9650 Arrrg!!!!!
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,546
Rep: 87
![]() Unique Rep: 76
Trader Rating: 13
|
it's controversial. I think most people would agree that LLC enabled for 1.3625v or LOWER is best, while LLC past 1.3625v most people see as just asking for chip degradation.
I have to use LLC quite simply because it's more stable that way. LLC < 1.3625v is fine. All it does is improve vdroop and cirumvent intel's throttling specification
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Linux Lobbyist
![]() |
nope. i use llc, but it is at 1.24 volts tho.
__________________
There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks. never go as5 to mouth ASrock[/COLOR] Pro/Extreme/Deluxe/SuperComputer club, P55 and X58 welcome[/B]"]http://www.overclock.net/intel-motherboards/588268-asrock-pro-extreme-deluxe-supercomputer-club.html Xeon Glory
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
sweet, ill go enable it after i finish priming.
__________________So armed with LCC, if i set 1.3v for it to be stable but it vdroops to around 1.216v, i can set something like 1.225v as the voltage and it will be 100% stable?
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Anandtech doesn't like LLC, but personally I think there's nothing wrong with it. Many high overclocks (4+ GHZ at high voltage) require it.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,546
Rep: 87
![]() Unique Rep: 76
Trader Rating: 13
|
Quote:
For example with LLC enabled, I set 1.35v in BIOS and get 1.31v under load. That's .04v droop which is pretty darn good. And that's what I use for 4.2GHz 24/7 Quote:
You simply need the extra oomph of the LLC.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 891
Rep: 34
![]() Unique Rep: 29
Trader Rating: 0
|
Ok, at 3.51ghz and 1.23vcore I froze once and blue screened the second time. I bumped up the vcore to 1.25 in cpu-z, NB 1.4, SB 1.35, VTT 1.2, and now it is stable after 6 minutes of small ffts. Now I'm gonna try 3.6ghz!
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 891
Rep: 34
![]() Unique Rep: 29
Trader Rating: 0
|
Arrrrg, this chip sucks. It took 1.344vcore to pass ten minutes of line pack, then I tried 4ghz and it took 1.385vcore to boot into windows, and failed line pack after one minute!!!!!
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
aww geez bad luck man... still, no harm in trying
__________________
Please don't call me Muncha, as cheese is not the only insinuatable munchable object; Ch33z will suffice. Oh, and i almost forgot to express my love for Heru ![]() Planned upgrades (kind of in order): 22" Monitor, Goliathus Omega (mousepad), new chair, Windows 7, CM 690, new desk, Ideazon ZBoard MERC, Sennheiser HD201, bong, DX 11 card(s)+necessary PSU Epic things happening in 2010: Toy Story 3, new H.I.M album, Supreme Commander 2, MechWarrior, The Elder Scrolls V, Mafia II, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Bioshock 2, Crysis 2, Iron Man 2
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,546
Rep: 87
![]() Unique Rep: 76
Trader Rating: 13
|
Quote:
I once had a E5200 that wouldn't even do 3.5GHz @ 1.3625v
__________________
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 891
Rep: 34
![]() Unique Rep: 29
Trader Rating: 0
|
q9650 and q9550 are the exact same except 0.5 multiplier right. If I were to trade this chip for a q9550 that clocks to 4ghz, it would be the same right?
__________________This dumb q9650 will only get to about 3.6 with safe volts. Maybe 3.8, but that would be pushin' it since 3.6 takes 1.344vcore.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 4ghz, megahalems, q9650 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|