intel is ripping us off - Page 4 - Overclock.net

Zippit · 03-20-09

Are you playing a trick on me?

UnAimed · 03-20-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by caraboose

And how exactly do you have 2 reps?

I ask the same question

Drakan290 · 03-20-09

toasting in an epic bread

Nautilus · 03-20-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaibot

of course its not a joke, why would it be
intel is being stingy with their nanometers and we need to do something about it before they take even more away!!!
with more nanometers we can put more voltage through our chips to make them perform better

yay jaibot keep going. lol they even trying to explain what nm means. you're selling good m8!

pLuhhmm · 03-20-09

more nanometers = bigger 8=======D

and

*** Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 46 (37 members and 9 guests)

2qwik2katch · 03-20-09

If you want more nanometers, ill trade you a 90nm chip for your q6600.

amder · 03-20-09

Oh how I rofl. Thanks for the sig.

1nfinity · 03-20-09

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...-wolfdale.html

Another thread you need to read if you think 65nm is better than 45nm. I have owned both and the 45nm's can sometimes use just a tad less Vcore than the 60nm's, same power, same speed, less heat! Its a win either way. For instance, look at your retail heatsink, and look at your friends, notice anything? His is a TON smaller than yours, and there is a reason for that.