|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel - General | |
ATI 4890 or Nvidia 275GTX
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]()
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,272
Rep: 464
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 350
Trader Rating: 2
|
Quote:
__________________
[OCN] -iceblade^: you must teach me the art of the troll
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
It's not a Crysis link it's an overclocking comparison. They just happened to use Crysis because its the most intensive game (Something that actually matters). And I really advise you rethink yourself before claiming other users are fanboys. I am in no way promoting NVIDIA over ATI. Both companies have their benefits and as you can see I even listed them. And in fact ATI performs better with AA in Crysis than NVIDIA does.
Look at the hits NVIDIA takes with AA:
![]()
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 06-24-09 at 04:36 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
funny, coz even though crysis is nvidia optimized there are a couple of reviews showing the 4890 getting about the same framerates as the 275 and beats it when aa is at 4x or 8x.
__________________
Ultimate Quad Core Clock for Clock Benchmarks: Thesis/HTPC Notebook: Puma's Cartwheel
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
http://www.overclock.net/intel-gener...ml#post6521788
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 06-24-09 at 04:39 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
you edited it.
![]() but performance wise and overclocking? nah
__________________
Ultimate Quad Core Clock for Clock Benchmarks: Thesis/HTPC Notebook: Puma's Cartwheel
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
I just fixed up a few words here and there but my point is still the same. I'm just trying to point out that they are equal cards and the decision lies in what you want to do with them.
Here's another note:
GTX275 for no AA HD4890 for AA ![]()
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 06-24-09 at 04:49 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
A friend of mine bought two XFX HD4890 BE one week ago, but he traded them for two XFX GTX275 XXX because of the noise. He says he didn't notice performance difference at all. It just depends on preferences at this point .
__________________
Last edited by TheBlademaster01 : 06-24-09 at 05:29 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
and you really won't notice the difference unless you bench them.
__________________
Ultimate Quad Core Clock for Clock Benchmarks: Thesis/HTPC Notebook: Puma's Cartwheel
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
you'd better have aa on when buying these high end cards
__________________
Last edited by skarm : 06-24-09 at 05:34 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|