Originally Posted by BlackOmega

Not really. Maybe the 512 version.

Some of the ones posted earlier in this thread. Granted they're at much higher resolutions than most people use.


Aside from that I compared my 4870XXX to an i7 rig with a 295, SLI disabled. I was VERY surprised to see that the 295 at the same settings w/ 16xQSAA did considerably worse than my 4870. 29fps compared to 17. Granted with SLI enabled it did considerably better, but the again he also had 2 of them. But it was still remarkably low considering the price of the hardware.
Anyway, if I'm not mistaken the 295 is basically 2 275's. And that was a "real world" test not some benchmark. So based on that,I'd go with a 4890.

Originally Posted by almighty15

Get the 275, overclock it passt a 280/285GTX and job done

Not mension Nvidea beat ATI in the most important part of games, MIN FRAME RATES

ATI's min framerates are stupidly low

Originally Posted by ItsTopher

You sir, are an nVidia fanboy.

Originally Posted by ltulod

are you describing yourself also?

Originally Posted by Conley

You missed the part where he took off Nvidia, implying that any fanboy could be described by that chart.

Anyways, enough with this. With all things averaged, the cards will perform almost exactly the same. Grab either one, and enjoy it.