imadude10

164 volts?!?! Lol. 1.64 is still really high, but seeing as you have water cooling... So temps should be the only thing to look out for while OCing? Not voltage or anything?

almighty15

http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/...ml#post6864405

__________________
Core 2 Duo E6420 @ 3.9Ghz : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=558967

Pentium Dual Core E6300 - 4.2Ghz : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=646455

Gigabyte EP45 Extreme FOR SALE.....PM for details

Clockadile Dundee

I guess this doesn't show the right data, it is at 3% load, but look at that.
71c-67c-68c-64c

Geez, I am such a noob; I have been using computers for nearly 2 decades, but I just started seriously endeavoring to learn how to OC properly. I just happened to remove from my signature "4.4 GHz HT on 1.45625v vCore". I set my vCore to 1.45625v in BIOS, but in CPU-Z, in this screenie, it is at 1.435v vCore. I made some changes to this very OC at 210MHz BCLK and same 1.45625v vCore, I think it was CPU VTT(it was this and remount), and CPU PLL, which made me more stable, along with an excellent beta (at the time, at least) BIOS, and brought temps from @100% load in LinX to what you see, max of 68c at 4420 HT on! It was like 7c or 8c higher, but that is due also to better water block remounts.

I am waiting for an RMA to come through for my mobo, but I have voltage measure pads on my 760 Classified, which I will systematically measure with my Fluke 88, compile that info, and then post it on OC.N. It has pads for vCore, Vtt, and several others including a ground pad. The Fluke 88 has shown errors of a few tenths of a volt, quite often, on various voltages; I trust the Fluke's readings more than the software's, you bet.
\

__________________