|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory | |
Confused about dividers and rated/real FSB/clocks
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Programmer
|
Okay, so I'm set up to get myself a Q6600 G0 like so many others, and the last component I need to figure out what to do about is the RAM.
__________________This is my first dedicated overclock ever (I've only dabbled before, and I've never really spent extra on parts to make an overclock work well). I've got an ultra120 Extreme on the way and a really powerful "Delta" 120mm fan for it (Which took a chunk out of my finger in testing) so I plan on trying to crank up this processor pretty well. Anyway, on to my question What I'm seeing is essentially that people are getting the Q6600s up to 400mhz bus speed, with 1600mhz Rated FSB. I read the RAM 101 topic... and what I gathered is that the best speed will be attained at a 1:1 ratio of RAM/CPU bus speeds. So if I'm running a Q6600 at 400mhz bus speed, would DDR2-800 be a 1:1 match, since they're both at a 400mhz bus? Or would a 1:1 match be DDR2-1600, hitting 1:1 with the Rated FSB? Basically, I'm looking at my optimal overclock hitting the 400mhz FSB. I need to know if I can get some good quality DDR2-800 rated sticks or if I should look for something with high overclocking potential. Right now I'm looking at these: http://www.overclock.net/hardware/sh...duct/503/cat/9
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Quote:
There is some people who get better performance from very highly clocked memory but I get better perf from 1:1 (synced) low latency and 1T CMD rate. At the same time it let me run my memory voltage a lot lower than high Mhz preserving it's life at the same time. A few good kits for the price (I know there are other good kits but this is just price vs performance ratio with prices going on at the time of posting...) - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227231 85$ after rebate 1T EPP http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227179 80$ after rebate 1T EPP http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146565 80$ after rebate If I was buying ram today id get one of those kits. Probably the Reaper or the Titanium. I know the Balistix is nice but I am not after the highest Mhz I like the 1T EPP profile.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
In your case...
__________________Stock: Q6600 @ 1066 QDR/4 = 266.5 FSB x 9 = 2.4GHz Front Side Bus (FSB) = 266.5MHz Quad Data Rate (QDR)= 1066MHz (FSB "Quad Pumped") Double Data Rate (DDR) = 533MHz 1:1 with a FSB @ 266.5MHz = 533MHz Memory Speed Overclocked: Q6600 @ 1600 QDR/4 = 400 FSB x 9 = 3.6GHz Q6600 @ 1600 QDR/4 = 400 FSB x 8 = 3.2GHz (Dropped Multiplier to 8) Front Side Bus (FSB) = 400MHz Quad Data Rate (QDR)= 1600MHz (FSB "Quad Pumped") Double Data Rate (DDR) = 800MHz 1:1 with a FSB @ 400MHz = 800MHz Memory Speed Your DDR2-800 will be running at its stock rated speed of 800MHz with a 400MHz FSB and a 1:1 memory ratio. In other words, the memory is running in a 1:1 ratio with the FSB. With DDR2-800 any FSB increase over 400MHz will begin to overclock the memory when left in a 1:1 ratio. For instance: 420MHz FSB = 840MHz memory speed 450MHz FSB = 900MHz memory speed 500MHz FSB = 1000MHz memory speed The memory can also be overclocked by leaving the FSB at its stock setting of 266MHz and changing the memory ratio by implementing a divider. The equation for figuring this would be: Front Side Bus multiplied by the Memory Divider multiplied by the Data Rate. The memory runs at double data rate so we multiply by two. 266.5MHz x 1.00 x 2 = DDR2-533 in a 1:1 ratio. 266.5MHz x 1.25 x 2 = DDR2-667 (rounded from 666.25) in a 4:5 ratio. 266.5MHz x 1.50 x 2 = DDR2-800 (rounded from 799.5) in a 2:3 ratio. 266.5MHz x 2.00 x 2 = DDR2-1066 in a 1:2 ratio. The above memory ratios can be explained as follows: 1:1 = 1 divided by 1 = 1.00 4:5 = 5 divided by 4 = 1.25 2:3 = 3 divided by 2 = 1.50 1:2 = 2 divided by 1 = 2.00 Hope this helps...
Last edited by Ellipsis : 07-26-07 at 06:50 AM Reason: typo |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Programmer
|
Yes, that was actually INCREDIBLY helpful, both responses.
__________________I too have noticed in the past huge performance increases from 1T timings. I think I'll get those Reapers you linked to and see if I end up sending my RAM past the 400mhz bus.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|