Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-08-07   #1 (permalink)
Sup'
 
Duckydude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,988

Trader Rating: 20
Default The Definitive Answer To: RAM Overclocking: Higher Speed vs. Tighter Timings

For quite I while now I have been debating whether to run my memory at tight timings or at high speeds. I decided to do some benchmarks myself to find out the answer. I ran four different benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra Memory bandwidth test, Everest Memory and Cache test, Superpi 1M Calculation and 3DMark06. I kept everything constant except the memory speed and timings for each test. I decided to run my graphics card at stock settings (700/2100) for the 3Dmark test to avoid potential hassles because sometimes the settings won't stick, etc. For each test that I ran, I set my memory to several different settings:

Super Tight Timings I: Speed: 667Mhz Timings: 3-3-3-3 Command Rate: 1T

Super Tight Timings II: Speed: 800Mhz Timings: 3-3-3-3 Command Rate: 1T

Super Tight Timings III: Speed: 833Mhz Timings: 3-3-3-3 Command Rate: 2T

Tight Timings I: Speed: 1000Mhz Timings: 4-4-4-4 Command Rate: 2T

Tight Timings II: Speed: 1066Mhz Timings: 4-4-4-4 Command Rate: 2T

Stock Settings: Speed: 1066Mhz Timings: 5-5-5-15 Command Rate: 2T

Moderate Timings: Speed: 1112Mhz Timings: 5-4-4-4 Command Rate: 2T

I decided to post my results for the stock settings appart from the others.

Alright let's get started on the tests:

Sisoft Sandra:


Everest Memory Test Benchmark Table:


Everest Memory Test:


Everest Memory Latency Test:


SuperPi 1M Calculation:


All benchmark tests ran at stock configuration:


I must note that these 3DMark06 tests were perfomed with a different processor overclock than
the rest of the tests. These test are just trying to show that memory speeds or timings do not have any effect in gaming performance.

This test was done with the following settings:
Speed: 756Mhz Timings: 3-3-3-3 Command Rate: 1T
3DMark06 (Default Settings and Video Card Was Left On Stock Settings):


This test was done with the following settings:
Speed: 907Mhz Timings: 4-4-4-8 Command Rate: 1T
3DMark06 (Default Settings and Video Card Was Left On Stock Settings):


This test was done with the following settings:
Speed: 1210Mhz Timings: 5-5-5-8 Command Rate: 2T
3DMark06 (Default Settings and Video Card Was Left On Stock Settings):


As you can see the higher speed has a greater effect (with intel systems) when testing with memory benchmarking software. As you can see from the 3DMark06 scores. memory speed and timings doesn't really affect the performance in games at all (Most of you probably already know this). Although it is interesting that the 3DMark06 score is a little higher with my RAM at 1T, 907Mhz, 4-4-4-8 timings; I thought it was pretty remarkable to get my RAM to even boot at 1T, so I think this is the reason behind that score. The Latency scores were all over the place, so I didn't really factor them in to my conclusion. Although there are some slight variations in the scores, the main consensus taken from these benchmarks is that higher speed wins over tighter timings (With Intel Systems At Least). Unless you can run your RAM at some crazy tight timings over a slightly higher speed, I would overclock your RAM at the higher speed. Thanks for listening folks and I hope that this was an interesting read.

System: i7 Amazazingness
CPU
Core i7 920 At 3.8Ghz 1.364v
Motherboard
EVGA X58
Memory
Gskill DDR3 3 x 2GB DDR1600 9-9-9-24
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 626/2100
Hard Drive
2 150GB Raptors + 2 1TB WD Blacks Each In RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzen X-Fi Prelude + Zhaolu DAC D3.0
Power Supply
Corsair HX620
Case
Antec P180
CPU cooling
TR. Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped) w/ 2 120mm fans
GPU cooling
Stock EVGA Cooler
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 (Vlited)
Monitor
Dell 2407WFP Rev. A02

Last edited by Duckydude : 11-10-07 at 12:37 AM
Duckydude is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-07   #2 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
rcdriver0604's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 909

Rep: 21 rcdriver0604 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 19
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Do a superpi run for me
__________________
Check out my photos http://flickr.com/photos/photosbyjacob/
What I need- Raised $100
1. ATH-A700's
2. Xtrememusic

System: Dual Core baby!
CPU
AMD 3800+ x2 Toledo LCBQE 2.8ghz
Motherboard
DFI LANParty UT NF4 SLI-DR Expert
Memory
Patriot Extreme DDR 400 2x1024mb 2-3-2-5
Graphics Card
7800gtx 256mb (497,1337)
Hard Drive
Western Digital 80, 160 gig
Sound Card
Onboard :(
Power Supply
OCZ GAMEXSTREAM 700watt
Case
Self Modded
CPU cooling
Scythe Ninja rev. B
OS
Windows XP Home Edition
Monitor
LG 19" widescreen LCD
rcdriver0604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-07   #3 (permalink)
Sup'
 
Duckydude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,988

Trader Rating: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcdriver0604 View Post
Do a superpi run for me
Good idea.

System: i7 Amazazingness
CPU
Core i7 920 At 3.8Ghz 1.364v
Motherboard
EVGA X58
Memory
Gskill DDR3 3 x 2GB DDR1600 9-9-9-24
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 626/2100
Hard Drive
2 150GB Raptors + 2 1TB WD Blacks Each In RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzen X-Fi Prelude + Zhaolu DAC D3.0
Power Supply
Corsair HX620
Case
Antec P180
CPU cooling
TR. Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped) w/ 2 120mm fans
GPU cooling
Stock EVGA Cooler
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 (Vlited)
Monitor
Dell 2407WFP Rev. A02
Duckydude is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-07   #4 (permalink)
Sup'
 
Duckydude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,988

Trader Rating: 20
Default

SuperPi tests now added.

System: i7 Amazazingness
CPU
Core i7 920 At 3.8Ghz 1.364v
Motherboard
EVGA X58
Memory
Gskill DDR3 3 x 2GB DDR1600 9-9-9-24
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 626/2100
Hard Drive
2 150GB Raptors + 2 1TB WD Blacks Each In RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzen X-Fi Prelude + Zhaolu DAC D3.0
Power Supply
Corsair HX620
Case
Antec P180
CPU cooling
TR. Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped) w/ 2 120mm fans
GPU cooling
Stock EVGA Cooler
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 (Vlited)
Monitor
Dell 2407WFP Rev. A02
Duckydude is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-07   #5 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 490

Rep: 46 Cyant is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 41
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Your 907Mhz 1T test is slower than 1200 because your FSB is not 1:1. You get more benefit with a FSB:Memory ratio of 1:1 as outlined here (a test I did a while ago at 425Mhz mem 4-4-4-16 1T with matching 425 Mhz FSB):


__________________
System: Cerebro
CPU
C2D E6420 3.4Ghz (8x425FSB 1:1)
Motherboard
Evga 680i SLI NF68-T1 - P31
Memory
OCZ Titanium Alpha VX2 + Crucial Ballistix PC8500
Graphics Card
Asus Geforce 8800GTX
Hard Drive
7 Hard Drives - All 7200RPM
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music
Power Supply
System - Enermax 565W / Hard Drives - Enermax 350W
Case
Thermaltake Mozart TX
CPU cooling
Scythe Ninja Rev.B + OCZ Ultra 5
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Windows XP SP2
Monitor
Compaq V1000 21" CRT
Cyant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-07   #6 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
xenophobe's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,181

Rep: 158 xenophobe is acknowledged by manyxenophobe is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 119
Trader Rating: 4
Default

You didn't test at stock settings?

That throws objectivity out the window. Why? You have no baseline for comparison.

Because, you would see that the difference from stock timings to super tight timings to be a huge gap, while increasing speed and loosening up those timings only provides a tiny bit extra than just tightening the timings.

The difference in SuperPi from super tight timings to overclocked only netted you a 0.054 decrease in your time to completion, which is hardly noticable.

What's the difference in SuperPi from stock speed and timing to super tight timings? I bet that difference will be far greater.
__________________
System: the big ugly
CPU
E6850 @ 3.75GHz 24/7
Motherboard
EVGA 680i A1
Memory
4GB OCZ EB HPC 4-3-3-15-2T
Graphics Card
EVGA 8800 GTX 3007WFP-HC
Hard Drive
2x320g Cudas + 2x320g WD AAKS
Power Supply
P&C Silencer 750w
Case
CM Cosmos
CPU cooling
Thermalright Ultima-90
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell 30" 3007WFP-HC + Samsung 21.3" 213T

Last edited by xenophobe : 11-09-07 at 03:42 AM
xenophobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-07   #7 (permalink)
Price/Performance Fanboy
 
DesertRat's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Kommiefornia
Posts: 6,052

Rep: 400 DesertRat is a proven memberDesertRat is a proven memberDesertRat is a proven memberDesertRat is a proven memberDesertRat is a proven member
Unique Rep: 286
Hardware Reviews: 3
Trader Rating: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xenophobe View Post
You didn't test at stock settings?

That throws objectivity out the window. Why? You have no baseline for comparison.

Because, you would see that the difference from stock timings to super tight timings to be a huge gap, while increasing speed and loosening up those timings only provides a tiny bit extra than just tightening the timings.

The difference in SuperPi from super tight timings to overclocked only netted you a 0.054 decrease in your time to completion, which is hardly noticable.

What's the difference in SuperPi from stock speed and timing to super tight timings? I bet that difference will be far greater.
quite possibly true. But we know that tighter timings or faster clocks will be better than stock and we can see that faster clock is better than tighter timings. SO we can conclude that faster clocks are better. However! You are completely right that you should have a baseline for comparison. If this we're to be a official review It'd need it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knitelife View Post
Best way to explain my thinking:
With enough money, anyone can win a race.
I'm the guy that wants to prove you can win the Daytona 500 with a jet engine shoehorned into a Ford Pinto driven by a chimpanzee.

System: Puff the Magic Dragon(Spooky)
CPU
AMD X4 20(unlocked 720)@3.62GHz(250x14.5@1.5v)
Motherboard
Biostar TA790GX3 A2+
Memory
2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 800 cl4
Graphics Card
XFX 4890XT
Hard Drive
WD 250GB SATA
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
Power Supply
Tt Toughpower 750W modular
Case
Gigabyte 3D Aurora
CPU cooling
Scythe Mugen2 + Ultra Kaze 3000RPM
GPU cooling
Scythe Musashi + Mod. RHS90 + 2x 12cm Grn LED fans
OS
Windows Vista X64 Home Premium
Monitor
Sceptre 42" 1080p
DesertRat is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-07   #8 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
xenophobe's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,181

Rep: 158 xenophobe is acknowledged by manyxenophobe is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 119
Trader Rating: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertRat View Post
quite possibly true. But we know that tighter timings or faster clocks will be better than stock and we can see that faster clock is better than tighter timings. SO we can conclude that faster clocks are better. However! You are completely right that you should have a baseline for comparison. If this we're to be a official review It'd need it
Well an extra 400MHz+ to the memory (over a 50% overclock mind you) only decreased SuperPi by 0.054 seconds. That increase is relatively meaningless.

How much did SuperPi decrease from stock timing/speed to super tight timings? Until that is shown, the 0.054 decrease has no real significance.
__________________
System: the big ugly
CPU
E6850 @ 3.75GHz 24/7
Motherboard
EVGA 680i A1
Memory
4GB OCZ EB HPC 4-3-3-15-2T
Graphics Card
EVGA 8800 GTX 3007WFP-HC
Hard Drive
2x320g Cudas + 2x320g WD AAKS
Power Supply
P&C Silencer 750w
Case
CM Cosmos
CPU cooling
Thermalright Ultima-90
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell 30" 3007WFP-HC + Samsung 21.3" 213T

Last edited by xenophobe : 11-09-07 at 04:39 AM
xenophobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-07   #9 (permalink)
Sup'
 
Duckydude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,988

Trader Rating: 20
Default

The only problem is that I can't run my memory at stock settings with this overclock and the only step in between is at 1167Mhz, which I can't get to even boot at cas 4, so it would sort of be pointless. Maybe I'll have to do it with my cpu at 3.0Ghz or something. What would you recommend the different steps in memory should be? And the 1:1 ratio thing is totally bogus by the way, sorry.

System: i7 Amazazingness
CPU
Core i7 920 At 3.8Ghz 1.364v
Motherboard
EVGA X58
Memory
Gskill DDR3 3 x 2GB DDR1600 9-9-9-24
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 626/2100
Hard Drive
2 150GB Raptors + 2 1TB WD Blacks Each In RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzen X-Fi Prelude + Zhaolu DAC D3.0
Power Supply
Corsair HX620
Case
Antec P180
CPU cooling
TR. Ultra 120 Extreme (Lapped) w/ 2 120mm fans
GPU cooling
Stock EVGA Cooler
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 (Vlited)
Monitor
Dell 2407WFP Rev. A02
Duckydude is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-07   #10 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 490

Rep: 46 Cyant is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 41
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckydude View Post
And the 1:1 ratio thing is totally bogus by the way, sorry.
Did you look at the screenshot by the way?
__________________
System: Cerebro
CPU
C2D E6420 3.4Ghz (8x425FSB 1:1)
Motherboard
Evga 680i SLI NF68-T1 - P31
Memory
OCZ Titanium Alpha VX2 + Crucial Ballistix PC8500
Graphics Card
Asus Geforce 8800GTX
Hard Drive
7 Hard Drives - All 7200RPM
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music
Power Supply
System - Enermax 565W / Hard Drives - Enermax 350W
Case
Thermaltake Mozart TX
CPU cooling
Scythe Ninja Rev.B + OCZ Ultra 5
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Windows XP SP2
Monitor
Compaq V1000 21" CRT
Cyant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.23758 seconds with 8 queries