Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-20-08   #1 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 15

Rep: 2 Man_o_meny_questions Unknown
Unique Rep: 2
Trader Rating: 0
Default Building O/C system Memory question.

I am building a system based on this spec. I wish to go for 4GB rather than 2GB ram. I am unsure which ram to go for (I want 2x2GB rather than 4X1GB modules). In the article above they say they are overclocking to 900 (450Mhz?), how do I know what memory I can safely do this with? Can anyone suggest a reasonable product to use?

Thanks
Man_o_meny_questions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-08   #2 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
Ghostleader's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 519

Rep: 80 Ghostleader is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 64
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man_o_meny_questions View Post
I am building a system based on this spec. I wish to go for 4GB rather than 2GB ram. I am unsure which ram to go for (I want 2x2GB rather than 4X1GB modules). In the article above they say they are overclocking to 900 (450Mhz?), how do I know what memory I can safely do this with? Can anyone suggest a reasonable product to use?

Thanks
There are a lot if memory that can run 900 (1 : 1 with FSB 450) "safe" but why would you run your memory 1 : 1.

I think you should go for 1066or higher, because Intel chipset performence better with higher MHz and looser timing then with lower Mhz and tighter timing and with any other divider then 1 : 1.

For exemple:

Go with FSB 266 or 333 and 1066 5-5-5-15 or 800 4-4-4-12, you be better of with 1066, you get higher bandwidth and lower latency.

And if you OC FSB to 400 and 1066 5-5-5-15 or 800 4-4-4-12, you be better of with 1066, you get higher bandwidth and lower latency, the different is bigger now because you use 1 : 1 with 800 and thatīs the worst divider you can run with a Intel chipset.

And if you OC FSB to 450 and OC your 1066 to 1080 5-5-5-15 and 800 to 950 4-4-4-12 (if youīre lucky) you be better of with 1080, you get higher bandwidth and lower latency, the different is same as with 1066 and 800 because you use 1 : 1 with 950.

Why is that, because thatīs the way itīs with Intel Memory Control Hub (MCH, North Bridge) and a thing called MCH Read Delay (tRD) and thatīs the time it takes to transfer data from the system bus (FSB) to the memory bus and vice versa, with a other word latency.

Read this if you want to learn more about it.

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3208&p=4


Hereīs a example of good 2x2 (4Gb) ram and they have good heatspreader to.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227289

And you should consider to switch that E2140 for a E8400, E2140 have FSB 200 CPUspeed 1,6 and L2 cache 1MB and E8400 have FSB 333 CPUspeed 3,0 and L2 cache 6MB.

If you gonna get some OC out of that E2140 you have to push it hard and itīs gonna get hot, the E8400 can do 3,6 with very little vcore increase and runs very cool.
__________________
System: Rampage Extreme Rig
CPU
E8600
Motherboard
ASUS Rampage Extreme BIOS 0403
Memory
Corsair Dominator PC14400
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD 4870X2
Hard Drive
WD Raptor 150Gb
Power Supply
Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W
Case
Antec 1200
CPU cooling
Watercooling
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
XP SP2
Ghostleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License Internet Security By ControlScan

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright Đ 2008 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.22125 seconds with 8 queries