|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory | |
DDR3 1600MHz vs 2000MHz
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
I'm buying my i7 parts this week and was set on getting this 1600MHz RAM kit, when I saw this 2000MHz kit for only $36 more ($16 more if you count the MiR). Notice that the 1600MHz kit has 8-8-8-21 timings while the 2000MHz one has 9-9-9-30. Is it worth the extra money to go with the 2000MHz? Or do the loosened timings kill any extra performance?
__________________
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who can read binary, and those who can't. Personal Best Benchmarks: 3dMark06 = 20,290 3dMarks 3dMark Vantage = P13,422 3dMarks
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
News Fiend
![]() |
Speed is more important than timings. I would get the cheaper memory personally, but I am a broke ass fool. If you can afford it the faster might be worth it.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
timing is what matters to me you get minimal performance gains with 2000mhz vs 1600mhz
__________________
Water Cooled Case suggestions Cosmos S w/Classified water cooled(1st) w/ heatkiller and feser 360 rad NZXT Tempest mod log(360 installed) (Fiance Build) Heatkiller Club NZXT Tempest User Community Xbox 360 mods thread http://www.overclock.net/xbox/435678...dders-out.html
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
I found this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227381 Not sure how reliable it is, but it does have a bit better timings for a bit cheaper.
Last edited by NewAtOCing : 06-09-09 at 01:17 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Hardcore Music Lover
![]() |
Well I notice in DDR2, going from 800 to 1,000 I saw some improvement. Same timings though
__________________
Convert 720/1080p Video's using x.264 + NeroAAC for Youtube Youtube: Audiotranceable
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Quote:
not for the i7 and memory. I remember there was an article here how it showed little performance gain with memory higher then 1600mhz
__________________
Water Cooled Case suggestions Cosmos S w/Classified water cooled(1st) w/ heatkiller and feser 360 rad NZXT Tempest mod log(360 installed) (Fiance Build) Heatkiller Club NZXT Tempest User Community Xbox 360 mods thread http://www.overclock.net/xbox/435678...dders-out.html
Last edited by Juggalo23451 : 06-09-09 at 01:28 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
News Fiend
![]() |
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
For me, DDR2 1066 5-5-5-15 was faster than DDR2 800 4-4-4-12.
I think that the speed matters more than the timings, but no one wants crappy timings.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
Yeah, any review of the topic will show speed increase improves performance more than tightening timings.
__________________The rule should be, find your max speed, then tighten your timings as much as possible.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
I went with the 2000MHz kit. Maybe after I get them I'll benchmark them at their rated frequency and timings, then drop them down to what the G.skill kit runs at and benchmark them at that to see if the loosened timings are worth it.
Thanks for your advice! +rep
__________________
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who can read binary, and those who can't. Personal Best Benchmarks: 3dMark06 = 20,290 3dMarks 3dMark Vantage = P13,422 3dMarks
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 1600mhz, 2000mhz, core i7, ddr3, ram |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|