Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-08-09   #31 (permalink)
jpz
Case Modder
 
jpz's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 932

Rep: 121 jpz is acknowledged by manyjpz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 87
Trader Rating: 0
Default

There's a lot more to overclocking than that. That was just an example I made up to help you understand. The Q6600 was a solid processor when it was released about two years ago. My Q6600 @ 3.6ghz is faster than some of the stock i7 processors and I think it's neck and neck with the stock Core i7 965.

A lot of the details in my example apply only to Core 2 systems. For example, the Core i7 does not have a front side bus and instead uses QuickPath Interconnect(QPI). The RAM dividers/ratios you are given to work with are whatever your motherboard supports- the problem with slow RAM is that you have to use the slowest ratios to run the RAM at that slow speed. Since you only have so many divider/ratio options given to you by the motherboard(you can't enter your own) then you are SOL if your RAM uses the slowest divider/ratio by default because you can't lower it for overclocking.

Five years ago we had P4 Prescotts with stock frequencies as high as 3.8ghz. Overclockers broke the 8ghz barrier with the P4 and Celeron, the 7ghz barrier was just broken with the Phenom II and the 6ghz barrier with Core i7.

You need to realize that freqency(hz) is not a unit of performance. Also, Processors have a small amount of high speed memory we call cache that it uses to store code and data. CPU cache has many times more bandwidth than system RAM. The RAM we have today is more than sufficient to supply our processors with data. As for why we have 3ghz processors and 800mhz RAM- that's just the way it worked out. There are many companies that make computer parts and electronics- all of which are working as hard as they can to develop the fastest, most efficient computer parts while remaining cost effective.
__________________
Interested in custom cases? Check out my scratch built acrylic case: BlackBox
Q6600 @ 4.32 Ghz
4 GHz Overclock Club

System: BlackBox
CPU
Q6600 3.6ghz @ 1.35V
Motherboard
Gigabyte X38-DS4
Memory
4GB Corsair Dominator 1033Mhz
Graphics Card
2x 3870 in Crossfire
Hard Drive
Hitachi P7K500 320GB
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Titanium
Power Supply
Corsair 750TX
Case
BlackBox (scratch built)
CPU cooling
Apogee GTX
GPU cooling
2x Swiftech MCW-60 R2
OS
64-bit Gentoo Linux / 64-bit Vista Ultimate
Monitor
Sceptre X24-WG 24" WUXGA
Overclock.net Mod of the Month
jpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-09   #32 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
Monst3r's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The best.. Aussie mate!
Posts: 2,799

Rep: 574 Monst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 207
Trader Rating: 1
Default

I always find that higher MHZ yields better performance then lower MHZ but tighter timings.. Remember to run benchies and Look for your bandwidth and latency.. Remember lower the latency and higher bandwidth is always better

System: My Ownage Rigz0r
CPU
| i7 Extreme 975|@| 5.1ghz |
Motherboard
| GA-EX58-UD3R F6Rev |
Memory
|Corsair Dominator GT's 7-8-7-18|
Graphics Card
| EVGA-c0-0p|SLI|295's |
Hard Drive
2x1 TB WD Cavier's HDD's Raid 0
Sound Card
| Auzentech F0rte 7.1 |
Power Supply
| Corsair | HX-1000w |
Case
| HAF| 932 |
CPU cooling
| Heatkiller Rev 3.0|D5 Vari0|360gtx|EK Res |
GPU cooling
| Stock EVGA |
OS
| Wind0ws 7 Ultimate |X64 |
Monitor
| Dell Ultrasharp "24" |
Monst3r is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-09   #33 (permalink)
4.104GHz
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,397

Rep: 749 Blameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 522
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Latency does not equal timings. Timings do not equal latency.

Latency is affected by both timings and clock speed. Higher clock speed = less latency. Tighter/lower timings = less latency.

Going from 1066 7-7-7-x to 1600 9-9-9-x, is a large reduction in latency and an increase in bandwidth, for example.

Clock speed will determine max theoretical bandwidth, but timings play a large part in determining how much of that bandwidth is realized.

As for alt-tabbing, amount of memory, and things like CPU speed and GPU drivers generally make more of a difference than memory performance.
__________________
System: Primary System
CPU
SLBEJ 3849B202 @ 4.1GHz, 216x19, 1.232v, HT On
Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-EX58-UD3R
Memory
4x1GiB mixed 1333 @ 1300, 7-7-7-20-T1, 1.5v
Graphics Card
BFG GTX 275 @ 729/1566/1296, 1.18v
Hard Drive
2x 7200.12 500GB, 2x 7200.10 250GB, single platter
Sound Card
Razer Barracuda AC-1
Power Supply
Enermax Modu82+ 625w
Case
Antec P182
CPU cooling
TRUE (lapped) + Panaflo FBA12G12H1BX
OS
Windows 7 Professional x64
Monitor
ASUS VW222U
Blameless is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-09   #34 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
amd ati

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 512

Rep: 15 tubers Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpz View Post
There's a lot more to overclocking than that. That was just an example I made up to help you understand. The Q6600 was a solid processor when it was released about two years ago. My Q6600 @ 3.6ghz is faster than some of the stock i7 processors and I think it's neck and neck with the stock Core i7 965.

A lot of the details in my example apply only to Core 2 systems. For example, the Core i7 does not have a front side bus and instead uses QuickPath Interconnect(QPI). The RAM dividers/ratios you are given to work with are whatever your motherboard supports- the problem with slow RAM is that you have to use the slowest ratios to run the RAM at that slow speed. Since you only have so many divider/ratio options given to you by the motherboard(you can't enter your own) then you are SOL if your RAM uses the slowest divider/ratio by default because you can't lower it for overclocking.

Five years ago we had P4 Prescotts with stock frequencies as high as 3.8ghz. Overclockers broke the 8ghz barrier with the P4 and Celeron, the 7ghz barrier was just broken with the Phenom II and the 6ghz barrier with Core i7.

You need to realize that freqency(hz) is not a unit of performance. Also, Processors have a small amount of high speed memory we call cache that it uses to store code and data. CPU cache has many times more bandwidth than system RAM. The RAM we have today is more than sufficient to supply our processors with data. As for why we have 3ghz processors and 800mhz RAM- that's just the way it worked out. There are many companies that make computer parts and electronics- all of which are working as hard as they can to develop the fastest, most efficient computer parts while remaining cost effective.
man.. are u a computer prof or something? thanks hehe..

cpu cache never crossed my mind! i wish i had just bought the q600 instead of my Phenom 9950 (i just started looking around at pcs on aug 26, 2008)..

man such a waste for me.. cant even reach 3.0 Ghz..

so the CPU clockspeed (Ghz/Mhz) doesnt mean performance increase?
__________________
System: AMD System
CPU
Phenom 9950 BE @ 2.8
Motherboard
MSI K9A2 Platinum V1 (790FX + SB600)
Memory
Kingston HyperX DDR2 1066Mhz 7-7-7-21 @ 2T
Graphics Card
VisionTek HD 4870 512mb (750Mhz + 900Mhz)
Hard Drive
1.5TB Seagate Barracadua + 500GB Maxtor
Sound Card
integrated/ built-in
Power Supply
Antec TruePowerTrio 650 watts
Case
Antec 900
OS
Windows Vista 64 bit
Monitor
Samsung 2333HD (TN Panel)
tubers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-09   #35 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
amd ati

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 512

Rep: 15 tubers Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monst3r View Post
I always find that higher MHZ yields better performance then lower MHZ but tighter timings.. Remember to run benchies and Look for your bandwidth and latency.. Remember lower the latency and higher bandwidth is always better
whats a good benchmark?

(no 3dmarks plz i tried that that i cant even tell much difference when changing memory stuff)
__________________
System: AMD System
CPU
Phenom 9950 BE @ 2.8
Motherboard
MSI K9A2 Platinum V1 (790FX + SB600)
Memory
Kingston HyperX DDR2 1066Mhz 7-7-7-21 @ 2T
Graphics Card
VisionTek HD 4870 512mb (750Mhz + 900Mhz)
Hard Drive
1.5TB Seagate Barracadua + 500GB Maxtor
Sound Card
integrated/ built-in
Power Supply
Antec TruePowerTrio 650 watts
Case
Antec 900
OS
Windows Vista 64 bit
Monitor
Samsung 2333HD (TN Panel)
tubers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-09   #36 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
amd ati

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 512

Rep: 15 tubers Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blameless View Post
Latency does not equal timings. Timings do not equal latency.

Latency is affected by both timings and clock speed. Higher clock speed = less latency. Tighter/lower timings = less latency.

Going from 1066 7-7-7-x to 1600 9-9-9-x, is a large reduction in latency and an increase in bandwidth, for example.

Clock speed will determine max theoretical bandwidth, but timings play a large part in determining how much of that bandwidth is realized.

As for alt-tabbing, amount of memory, and things like CPU speed and GPU drivers generally make more of a difference than memory performance.
oh.. then what would be the real use of 1600Mhz 8-8-8-x to me?
__________________
System: AMD System
CPU
Phenom 9950 BE @ 2.8
Motherboard
MSI K9A2 Platinum V1 (790FX + SB600)
Memory
Kingston HyperX DDR2 1066Mhz 7-7-7-21 @ 2T
Graphics Card
VisionTek HD 4870 512mb (750Mhz + 900Mhz)
Hard Drive
1.5TB Seagate Barracadua + 500GB Maxtor
Sound Card
integrated/ built-in
Power Supply
Antec TruePowerTrio 650 watts
Case
Antec 900
OS
Windows Vista 64 bit
Monitor
Samsung 2333HD (TN Panel)
tubers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-09   #37 (permalink)
jpz
Case Modder
 
jpz's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 932

Rep: 121 jpz is acknowledged by manyjpz is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 87
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubers View Post
man.. are u a computer prof or something? thanks hehe..

cpu cache never crossed my mind! i wish i had just bought the q600 instead of my Phenom 9950 (i just started looking around at pcs on aug 26, 2008)..

man such a waste for me.. cant even reach 3.0 Ghz..

so the CPU clockspeed (Ghz/Mhz) doesnt mean performance increase?
Higher Ghz means more performance when comparing two of the same model/series processor. For example, a 3.6ghz Q6600(Kentsfield), 3.6ghz Q6700(Kentsfield), and 3.6ghz QX6800(Kentsfield) should all perform about the same, and all of them will be faster than a 3.4ghz Q6600, Q6700, or Q6800. What you cannot do is compare a 3.6ghz Q6600(Kentsfield) to a 3.5ghz Q9550(Yorkfield) or a 3.2ghz Core i7 965(Nehalem) and say the Q6600 is the fastest because it has the highest clockspeed- the 3.2ghz Core i7 is probably faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubers View Post
whats a good benchmark?

(no 3dmarks plz i tried that that i cant even tell much difference when changing memory stuff)
I've seen a lot of people using the Everest cache and memory benchmark lately. That will give you raw performance data.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubers View Post
oh.. then what would be the real use of 1600Mhz 8-8-8-x to me?
You wouldn't notice any difference with 1600Mhz 8-8-8-X.

Tubers, next time please make use of the multi-quote function instead of triple posting. Instead of clicking the wide buttom that says "Quote" at the bottom right, click the button just to the right of that which has a "+ on it. You click that button for each post you want to quote, and then on the final one you press the normal quote button. Then all the quotes will be in one post.
__________________
Interested in custom cases? Check out my scratch built acrylic case: BlackBox
Q6600 @ 4.32 Ghz
4 GHz Overclock Club

System: BlackBox
CPU
Q6600 3.6ghz @ 1.35V
Motherboard
Gigabyte X38-DS4
Memory
4GB Corsair Dominator 1033Mhz
Graphics Card
2x 3870 in Crossfire
Hard Drive
Hitachi P7K500 320GB
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi Titanium
Power Supply
Corsair 750TX
Case
BlackBox (scratch built)
CPU cooling
Apogee GTX
GPU cooling
2x Swiftech MCW-60 R2
OS
64-bit Gentoo Linux / 64-bit Vista Ultimate
Monitor
Sceptre X24-WG 24" WUXGA
Overclock.net Mod of the Month
jpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-09   #38 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
Monst3r's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The best.. Aussie mate!
Posts: 2,799

Rep: 574 Monst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famousMonst3r is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 207
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Good benchmarking program for memory that reads bandwidth/latency Lavalys Everest cache And memory Benching software.. As for Overclocking your ram, its better to have a higher MHZ OC with looser timings then say a lower OC with tighter timings such as 4-4-4-12 for example..

System: My Ownage Rigz0r
CPU
| i7 Extreme 975|@| 5.1ghz |
Motherboard
| GA-EX58-UD3R F6Rev |
Memory
|Corsair Dominator GT's 7-8-7-18|
Graphics Card
| EVGA-c0-0p|SLI|295's |
Hard Drive
2x1 TB WD Cavier's HDD's Raid 0
Sound Card
| Auzentech F0rte 7.1 |
Power Supply
| Corsair | HX-1000w |
Case
| HAF| 932 |
CPU cooling
| Heatkiller Rev 3.0|D5 Vari0|360gtx|EK Res |
GPU cooling
| Stock EVGA |
OS
| Wind0ws 7 Ultimate |X64 |
Monitor
| Dell Ultrasharp "24" |
Monst3r is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.16014 seconds with 8 queries