|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Memory | |
basic question i have about ram..
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
is it more important to have lower values at a lower MHz or higher values at a higher MHz?
__________________ex, which is better (faster) and why? DDR3-1866 CL 9-9-9-24 or DDR3-1600 CL 7-7-7-20 i have no prior knowledge so detail is encouraged ;] Thanks!
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dripping Springs/Denton
Posts: 880
Rep: 45
![]() Unique Rep: 43
Trader Rating: 1
|
iirc, it's better to have the higher frequency with slightly higher timings. You could always get the best of both worlds and get RAM that's higher frequency than you want and drop the frequency to what you desire and lower the timings to be really tight
__________________
I'm a junior in college, Comp Sci major/math minor, if you wanna talk, send me a pm ![]() The *OFFICIAL* HAF 932 Case Owners Club My HAF 932 Paint Job![]() Water Cooling (own red, need black) Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
You might want to read this.
Generally it's better to have faster speed at slightly higher timings, but you're trying to get a combination of the 2.
__________________
Pictorial Guide for Installing the Tuniq Tower
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
2 clocks is a lot to give up for that small increase in speed. But for the exact answer someone would have to test. I suspect 1600 CL7 might have greater bandwidth. But also keep in mind that how application is making memory requests can come into play and depending how either of those could be better on specific app. No one size fits all.
And we are talking Intel here not AMD. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|