|
|
|
#1041 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Will the rev. 2.0 version of this board post with a Wolfdale and no bios update first? straight out of the box? Or do I need to flash the bios first, somehow?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1042 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Quote:
I read the manual, Rev. 2 should post but will require a bios flash (can be easily done in bios <enter key> (Q-flash) with a floppy drive, or Memory stick. Many report the 8400's run out of the box. First boot, hit bios up. Read the mobo manual (Newegg>product>manufacturer page>download manual>bios flash on pg. 62) I'll report when I build mine tomorrow.
__________________
E0 8500 @ leisurely 3.9 / BIOSTAR TP45HP ![]() Tinkering with E8400's, X4 940's, and more.
Last edited by lenzo : 01-30-08 at 02:29 AM Reason: corrected text Quickflash to Q-Flash, wouldn't want to mislead anyone on a bios flash! |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#1043 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Quote:
Looks to me that what's happening is when idle, EIST is kicking in and lowering your multiplier to x6. This is simply a power saving feature and won't hurt anything, although I have read it can interfere with your OC.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1044 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
Quote:
Just took some temperature reading straight from bios. It seems more reasonable than coretemp and everest. I suspect EasyTune 5 takes the temperature reading straight from bios. 3.0G stock speed @ 8C 4.5G @ 16C The temperature is 100% increase but it is still pretty cool. ![]()
__________________
E8400@4.8Ghz CPU-Z validation ![]() http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=306819 Sub 10s SuperPI 1M time http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8444/sub10nu4.jpg My computer thread: http://www.overclock.net/intel-build...ml#post3331900 Laptops: Sony VGN-SZ650N Sony VGN-FZ180E
Last edited by c230k : 01-30-08 at 04:24 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1045 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Quote:
![]() I have a bunch of stuff on it's way from new egg right now, but my mobo from clubit and proc from mwave I have yet to get shipment notification on ordered sunday morning...
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1046 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
After this, I started researching the cooler I have and stumbled across Anadtech's review which tests this very cooler with a 6800 extreme, and now I am starting to see the clear picture. Link: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3202&p=4 I keep my fan set on medium speeds with my 45nm E8400, which obviously puts out less heat then the 6800 extreme. Looking at their graph, they have their processor at Idle with temps of 25C low fan and 23C high fan. My Idle is about 17/18C, according to Easytune, which I feel is right since my processor is on a smaller scale. Then I looked at their load temps; the 6800 extreme has 39C low fan speed and 36C high fan speed. My processor after the hour stress test using Easytune was 32C and 45C using CoreTemp. Although these are different processors, it is the same exact cooler, so armed with this info I would have to call shenanigans on the CoreTemp program, at least for the E8400 processors. It would seem that the Easytune takes its temps from the bios directly and unless the bios reading is wrong, then these are the accurate temps. Side note: "When I am in bios, it says my CPU temperature is 16C and motherboard is 30C", my temps are almost exactly the same when in the bios as well. we have the same motherboard and processor so I think the bios is right. Also, I have not overclocked my system yet, these are stock temps. Your CPU is water cooled and mine is air cooled, so I would expect mine to be higher then yours, but not CoreTemp high.
__________________
"One definition of insanity is to keep doing things the same way and expecting different results." ~ Stephen R. Covey ![]() "Education is what you get when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't." ~ Pete Seeger ![]() PSN ID: Dan-K-Nugs
Last edited by bioniccrackmonk : 01-30-08 at 10:24 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1047 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
So I guess these processors DO run cool
It really made me feel uncomfortable when I first saw these 45nm run more than twice as hot as my 65nm quad at idle... Hope they come up with a new program that can read the correct temp soon.
__________________
E8400@4.8Ghz CPU-Z validation ![]() http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=306819 Sub 10s SuperPI 1M time http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8444/sub10nu4.jpg My computer thread: http://www.overclock.net/intel-build...ml#post3331900 Laptops: Sony VGN-SZ650N Sony VGN-FZ180E
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1048 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Networking Nut
|
ok i have a questoin, i have the opportunity to get 8gb ram, 4 x 2gb of mushkin ddr2 800. should i got for it? or should i just get 4 gb (if i get 8gb id then get vista x64). i need some help with this decision
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1049 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
|
Best. Motherboard. Ever.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1050 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
I'd question whether or not you need 8 GB of RAM. Do you do anything with your rig that would require it? I honestly can't see any reason to have more than 4 GB unless you're doing some really massive encoding work.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|