Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Motherboards

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-16-09   #4141 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 174

Rep: 7 vaatem12 Unknown
Unique Rep: 5
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Yeah, you think since my fsb at 471 is too high i need a new PSU? my current 550w logisys psu really isnt for enthusiasts more for...mom and pop
__________________
System: GAMING PC
CPU
i7 920 D0
Motherboard
Pending Arrival. Fri 14th 2009
Memory
Corsair DDR3 XMS3 6GB
Graphics Card
Geforce GTX 275_
Hard Drive
Hitachi x2-500gb-x1 Blk Cviar 1TB
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
750w OCZ
Case
Pending arrivial...Antec 300 to be modded
CPU cooling
Scythe Mugen 2
GPU cooling
ANTEC_cooler
OS
Vista-Ultimate-sp2
Monitor
Viewsonic 17" Flatscreen
vaatem12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4142 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
supaspoon's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 827

Rep: 75 supaspoon is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 59
Trader Rating: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vaatem12 View Post
Yeah, you think since my fsb at 471 is too high i need a new PSU? my current 550w logisys psu really isnt for enthusiasts more for...mom and pop
Well, I don't know as to the specific reason but yeah, oc'ing a quad (even though it is a 45) and a 4870. But generally yes, if your psu's putting on a 4th of July show & shooting flaming particles at your cat it might be wise to invest a little more in that department next time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heru View Post
Whats the problem? Why are certain body places considered bad, like gentles. Is you do with them? I just don't get it, I see nothing offending about a rear end, beasts or gentles.

System: PixolSculptor
CPU
i7 920 d0 - 4.21ghz w/ HT @ 1.28vcore
Motherboard
EVGA x58 LE
Memory
12gb ocz Flex @ 1604
Graphics Card
xfx 4890 @ 975/1150
Hard Drive
Velociraptor / 1tb storage
Power Supply
850w tt
Case
ABS Black Pearl OTW
CPU cooling
HtKllr & Gtx360Xtrm p/p shrouded 655 bp mod & top
OS
Win7x64
Monitor
24in+22in LCD
supaspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4143 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: centreville, va
Posts: 1,623

Rep: 73 richardbb85 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 56
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoGuru View Post
I would not. You would be pushing that chip really hard, and you don't want to smell smoke.
yea true

not sure what else i can do then

System: First Build PC
CPU
Q6600 at 3.90 1.6v, 1.52 idle 1.44 load in CPUZ
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
4 GB G.Skills 2x2GB
Graphics Card
Evga gts 250 849/2049/1205
Hard Drive
320 GB
Power Supply
Antec EW 500
Case
Haf 932
CPU cooling
Heatkiller v3 LC, XSPC 360, MCP 655, Micro v2 Res
GPU cooling
stock cooler
OS
Vista Ultimate 64 bit
Monitor
22in Samsung SyncMaster220wm
richardbb85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4144 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
xguntherc's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2008
Location: VEGAS Baby!
Posts: 3,289

Rep: 192 xguntherc is acknowledged by manyxguntherc is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 161
Hardware Reviews: 4
Trader Rating: 19
Default

PSU is the heart of the PC.. why build a great PC with nice, top line parts. and get the cheapest smallest power supply to give it power.. you want a good, solid, efficient power line going to ur system. people should not go cheap on the psu.

Thanks Supa for the reply.

I'm going to leave the cpu at stock for the buyer..i might try to tighten timings on the ram. but i don't want to have any bluescreens later on him so i probably wont do that. unless it can handle all 8GB at something lower than 5-5-5-15 and stay stable.
__________________
H20 Loop: Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Feser TFC360 RAD w/ 3 Yate Loon D12SM, MCP-655 D5 Vario, Micro Res v2, Masterkleer 7/16 ID, DD "FatBoy" 1/2 Barbs, Pentosin G11 Blue. 28c Idle, 39c Load

Project HAF Water-Cooled
3DMark06 High Score 21,710
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9678912
Best Overclock, & There's More to Come http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=491589

Official OCN Camera Club
|Nikon D40| |18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR| |55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR|

System: Gotta HAF Water
CPU
Q9650 E0 @ 4.0 GHz 1.304v
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW (Pencil Mod)
Memory
2x2GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500C5D
Graphics Card
eVGA/MSI GTX 260 SLI
Hard Drive
2 WD Black 640GB AALS (Raid0) + 500GB Ext x2
Sound Card
X-Fi XtremeGamer + ATH-AD500 / NE-7M IEM's
Power Supply
Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w PSU
Case
CM HAF 932
CPU cooling
Apogee GTZ, Feser TFC 360
OS
Windows 7 Build 7201 Til RTM
Monitor
Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" IPS
xguntherc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4145 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
dennyb's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 1,991

Rep: 268 dennyb is a proven memberdennyb is a proven memberdennyb is a proven member
Unique Rep: 142
Trader Rating: 0
Default

@Richardbb- You might want to check this post by supaspoon as a way of identifying the limits of the board and the CPU

Quote:
Originally Posted by supaspoon View Post
Well, I think a better way of putting it is to test by a process of elimination. Using these methods you are ruling out certain variables from being potential 'problem sources'.

NoG pretty much clarified what I meant w/ turning down the cpu multi. What I was getting at about the p95 tests is this:

When you run prime a little window pops up and asks what kind of test you want to run. This usually defaults to a "blend" test, which does test your cpu, but it also is testing your chipset and memory. Generally, any number of little problems will be indicated by failing a blend test. This is good for testing 'overall' stability, but it's not much use in figuring out 'specifically' what the problem is. This is where running a 'small ftt' test comes in handy. When that window pops up, choose small ftt's instead of blend. This test focuses on the cpu instead of your overall system. By running the two tests and knowing what they test, you can figure out the general area of a problem by which test does/doesn't fail.

For ex: Fail on small ftt tests - need to adjust cpu related settings such as vcore/vtt. But.....if you can pass small ftt's, but are failing the blend test, then you know the problem is not your cpu, so you can focus on the nb/mem.

The general idea is that you can try to narrow down the general area your problem is coming from. That way you don't have to simply randomly throw numbers at your board, which may work eventually, but is very inefficient.

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardbb85 View Post
yea true

not sure what else i can do then

System: GIGABYTE GOODNESS
CPU
Q9650@4.0Ghz. 1.30625/1.25vid
Motherboard
GA-EP45-UD3P/F10b
Memory
G.Skill/2x2Gb.BLACK PII/8500
Graphics Card
Sapphire 4830/1GB DDR3-700/1175
Hard Drive
Seagate 250Gb/7200
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair 620-HX
Case
Antec 900
CPU cooling
Xigmatek Dark Knight/Delta/Lamptron FC-2
OS
Vista 64 bit
Monitor
Samsung2433BW
dennyb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4146 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: centreville, va
Posts: 1,623

Rep: 73 richardbb85 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 56
Trader Rating: 0
Default

i only run Small FTT test

just failed at 3.9ghz with 1.54v

System: First Build PC
CPU
Q6600 at 3.90 1.6v, 1.52 idle 1.44 load in CPUZ
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
4 GB G.Skills 2x2GB
Graphics Card
Evga gts 250 849/2049/1205
Hard Drive
320 GB
Power Supply
Antec EW 500
Case
Haf 932
CPU cooling
Heatkiller v3 LC, XSPC 360, MCP 655, Micro v2 Res
GPU cooling
stock cooler
OS
Vista Ultimate 64 bit
Monitor
22in Samsung SyncMaster220wm
richardbb85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4147 (permalink)
Mobo Master
 
NoGuru's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lake Orion MI.
Posts: 2,372

Rep: 218 NoGuru is acknowledged by manyNoGuru is acknowledged by manyNoGuru is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 117
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardbb85 View Post
i only run Small FTT test

just failed at 3.9ghz with 1.54v
Some people don't even get 3.6 out of that chip. I understand your disappointed but you still got a stable OC to be happy with.
__________________

Without question the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer. Oh, I grant you the wheel was also a fine invention, but a wheel does not go as well with pizza.



Join Overclock.nets
HWbot team here!

9.770 super pi


E8400 @ 4.93 GHz on Air

System: My Foot Rest
CPU
E8400EO@4.5@1.36
Motherboard
GA-EP45-UD3P F10e
Memory
4G G.SKILL 1066/F2's
Graphics Card
Zotac 9600 GT
Hard Drive
320G+80G
Sound Card
Creative Live
Power Supply
600W MSI turbo=1.21jigawatts
Case
Ultra Gladiator
CPU cooling
XIGMATEX HDT S1283, NB Extreme Spirit II
GPU cooling
Big Zalman
OS
Windows XP Black/Windows 7 RC
Monitor
Samsung 930B
NoGuru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4148 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: centreville, va
Posts: 1,623

Rep: 73 richardbb85 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 56
Trader Rating: 0
Default

yea u right, maybe i should just settle with 3.8 and call it a day..



System: First Build PC
CPU
Q6600 at 3.90 1.6v, 1.52 idle 1.44 load in CPUZ
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
4 GB G.Skills 2x2GB
Graphics Card
Evga gts 250 849/2049/1205
Hard Drive
320 GB
Power Supply
Antec EW 500
Case
Haf 932
CPU cooling
Heatkiller v3 LC, XSPC 360, MCP 655, Micro v2 Res
GPU cooling
stock cooler
OS
Vista Ultimate 64 bit
Monitor
22in Samsung SyncMaster220wm
richardbb85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4149 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 174

Rep: 7 vaatem12 Unknown
Unique Rep: 5
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Its not that its just i had a completely specific ammount of money. and didnt have enough for psu and 550w is def. sufficient for the time being. but could that possibly be the reason why im maxing at like 465 fsb even at 6.0multiplier @ 2.8ghz? possible my psu is blocking me going passed 465 fsb?
__________________
System: GAMING PC
CPU
i7 920 D0
Motherboard
Pending Arrival. Fri 14th 2009
Memory
Corsair DDR3 XMS3 6GB
Graphics Card
Geforce GTX 275_
Hard Drive
Hitachi x2-500gb-x1 Blk Cviar 1TB
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
750w OCZ
Case
Pending arrivial...Antec 300 to be modded
CPU cooling
Scythe Mugen 2
GPU cooling
ANTEC_cooler
OS
Vista-Ultimate-sp2
Monitor
Viewsonic 17" Flatscreen
vaatem12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-09   #4150 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
dennyb's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 1,991

Rep: 268 dennyb is a proven memberdennyb is a proven memberdennyb is a proven member
Unique Rep: 142
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vaatem12 View Post
Its not that its just i had a completely specific ammount of money. and didnt have enough for psu and 550w is def. sufficient for the time being. but could that possibly be the reason why im maxing at like 465 fsb even at 6.0multiplier @ 2.8ghz? possible my psu is blocking me going passed 465 fsb?
Have you adjusted the V-core so that it will read 1.36 or so in CPUZ (load)? Do that- set CPU Term to 1.34v and MCH Core to 1.32xvolts and try small ffts

System: GIGABYTE GOODNESS
CPU
Q9650@4.0Ghz. 1.30625/1.25vid
Motherboard
GA-EP45-UD3P/F10b
Memory
G.Skill/2x2Gb.BLACK PII/8500
Graphics Card
Sapphire 4830/1GB DDR3-700/1175
Hard Drive
Seagate 250Gb/7200
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair 620-HX
Case
Antec 900
CPU cooling
Xigmatek Dark Knight/Delta/Lamptron FC-2
OS
Vista 64 bit
Monitor
Samsung2433BW
dennyb is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ep45-ud3p, gigabyte, ud3r


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
CrazyLegs19
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17115 seconds with 9 queries