|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Motherboards | |
**Unlinked FSB bad idea?**
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
I dunno why you hate IBT but LinX is fine too since it uses linpack also.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Case Modder
![]() |
here since you guys doubt my Everest.
5-5-5-15 @ Sub 1066 speed. ![]() 5-5-5-15 @ 1066.
__________________
The Better HAF Process Frosty: The Snow Tower![]() The HAF 932 Case Owners Club![]() Georgia State Overclockers![]() Batch: Q829A138 - Wafer Number: 11 - Pack Date: 9/18/08 AIM - tKBaha
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Awesome man. Can you do me one more favor? Run unlinked FSB at the same FSB you have for linked and then post the result. That'll be the true test.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Case Modder
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
The Better HAF Process Frosty: The Snow Tower![]() The HAF 932 Case Owners Club![]() Georgia State Overclockers![]() Batch: Q829A138 - Wafer Number: 11 - Pack Date: 9/18/08 AIM - tKBaha
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
OK well this makes much sense then. It's all about the ratio even if it's not taken into account. The further apart the clocks are the greater the latency. So yeah unlinked is technically the same thing as linked just "fine tuned" as said before. In that case, it's actually a very useful feature.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rogers Park, 60626
Posts: 3,469
Rep: 406
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 321
Trader Rating: 0
|
Are you sure? Anyway I hope you got your answers. Even if I seem like a bitter man.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Here's my result on my Intel board:
![]() Interesting that although your RAM and my RAM are running practically identical you have much better results.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Quote:
So to do a better comparison you should back down to 475 and run a 1:1 (950MHz) and a 6:5 (~1140) and see what you get but then again you have a Nvidia chipset board and one shouldn´t compare Intel with Nvidia when it comes to bandwidth and latency.
__________________
Asus Rampage Extreme Overclocking Guide Running SLI on a Rampage Formula Running SLI on a Rampage Extreme Test Rig Asus Rampage Extreme 0403/1104 / E8600 / 4x1 Corsair Dominator PC-14400 1800C7 (Micron D9GTR) / EVGA GTX 285 FTW / Windows 7 RC 64-Bit
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
Even though Intel is supposed to be better for OCing supposedly. (Especially the board I have now is like their best OCing board)
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 06-30-09 at 01:41 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rogers Park, 60626
Posts: 3,469
Rep: 406
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 321
Trader Rating: 0
|
Openeyes how about a CR1?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 780i, fsb, intel, nvidia, unlinked |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|