Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Intel > Intel Motherboards

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-01-09   #11 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
ghost2501's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 555

Rep: 44 ghost2501 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 40
Trader Rating: 9
Default

I was really confused like I said the math worked out where I could get 1600 at all 4 timmings on my P5E64 WS EVOLUTION and E8400. I can litterally run all the latches wtih no noticable difference at all and they are all stable. There was only a slight increase in read speed or one of the 3 memory speeds the rest was virtually identical.
__________________
System: My System
CPU
i7 920
Motherboard
P6T6 WS REVOLUTION
Memory
12G Corsair Dominator 1600
Graphics Card
GTX 275
Power Supply
Antec 850 Signature Series
Case
PCA77B
CPU cooling
120 TRUE ULTRA EXTREME LAPPED
OS
Win 7 64
Monitor
216BW
ghost2501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #12 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
Bal3Wolf's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 6,269

Rep: 461 Bal3Wolf is a proven memberBal3Wolf is a proven memberBal3Wolf is a proven memberBal3Wolf is a proven memberBal3Wolf is a proven member
Unique Rep: 309
Hardware Reviews: 1
Trader Rating: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSingh View Post
This is how I've come to understand it.

0-265FSB = 200mhz strap
266-332 FSB = 266 Strap
333-400MHZ = 333 strap
400+ fsb = 400strap.

I've actually tested this and it's come out to be true.
I can't boot AT ALL at 268 with the 200 strap enabled and can with the 266.
I can boot fine at 399 with the 333mhz strap but it refuses to do so with the 400mhz strap.

So, I just run 400 all the time at 400FSB (RAM limitation)

Must be differt on Gigabyte EP45-UD3P cause im running fsb of 486 and a 333 strap i just checked.
__________________
3dmark06 vista 15365
CPUZ 4169
Prime95 4HR

System: game/folding
CPU
q6600 L743 1.20vid 450x8 3600 1.34
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Memory
OCZ FLEX2 pc9200 1150mhz
Graphics Card
Evga 8800GT Superclocked 760/1892/2000
Hard Drive
3x 320gig raid 0 1x 1tb 1x 750gig
Power Supply
Ultra X-Connect V-Series ULT33183 700 Watts
Case
Antec 900 modded
CPU cooling
tuniq tower+SILVERSTONE FM121
GPU cooling
Nv silencer 5 rev 3
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit
Monitor
ASUS VW246H Black 24" 2ms
1 Million+ Folding at Home points

Last edited by Bal3Wolf : 07-01-09 at 10:57 PM
Bal3Wolf is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #13 (permalink)
Crazy OC'in' SOB
 
Lord Xeb's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,779

Rep: 287 Lord Xeb is a proven memberLord Xeb is a proven memberLord Xeb is a proven member
Unique Rep: 236
Folding Team Rank: 950
Trader Rating: 7
Default

The latch basically controls the FSB : DRAM ratio. If it s a 400 2.00 latch w/ 400 FSB then it would multiply your 400 FSB by 2 and give you 800. Which would give you your ram speed. Or something like that


Also keep in mind that an Intel FSP is quad pumped (meaning you take the FSB you set on your CPU and multiply it by 4 which gives you your FSB speed).

System: The beast that takes a lickin' and keeps on tickin
CPU
Q6600 3.6 1.47v
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R
Memory
OCZ SLI 2x2GB 826 5-5-5-18
Graphics Card
Asus 9800GTX+ Dark Knight 815/1971/1100
Hard Drive
2 SeaGate 250GB RAID0 1 500GB WD (32MB cache)
Sound Card
Built in
Power Supply
Corsair TX650W
Case
Modified Antec 300 (7 fans)
CPU cooling
Xiggy S1283 taped IC7 UK3K
GPU cooling
Mushashi :D
OS
Win7 Pro x64 - Ubuntu 9.04
Monitor
1280x1024 X2gen D:
Lord Xeb is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #14 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,050

Rep: 106 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 82
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Xeb View Post
The latch basically controls the FSB : DRAM ratio. If it s a 400 2.00 latch w/ 400 FSB then it would multiply your 400 FSB by 2 and give you 800. Which would give you your ram speed. Or something like that


Also keep in mind that an Intel FSP is quad pumped (meaning you take the FSB you set on your CPU and multiply it by 4 which gives you your FSB speed).
Actually latch is not FSB : DRAM ratio. That's what SPD is. 2.00 = 1:1 ratio which is what I want but there's two types of 2.00. One that works at 333mhz and one that works at 400mhz. But I'm actually running 475mhz which is why I was asking about which would be better.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #15 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
GSingh's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Bay, Cali
Posts: 2,400

Rep: 165 GSingh is acknowledged by manyGSingh is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 142
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bal3Wolf View Post
Must be differt on Gigabyte EP45-UD3P cause im running fsb of 486 and a 333 strap i just checked.
Yeah, on the DS3R I can't boot 399 with 400strap and can't boot 400 with the 333 strap.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TFL Replica View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraudbrand View Post
You should thank the 360 for keeping many PC developers alive and profitable.
That's the equivalent of hitting someone with a car and then dragging them to the hospital and smacking them in the face as soon as they regain consciousness to demand gratitude.

System: Turd Machine (its ubar)
CPU
Q6600*Lapped*
Motherboard
Gigabyte EP45 - DS3R
Memory
4GB Expensive Crucial ValuRAM. 800mhz
Graphics Card
Visiontek HD4850
Hard Drive
WD 320GB
Sound Card
Onboard HD audio
Power Supply
Thermaltake Purepower 600W
Case
Antec 900
CPU cooling
Zalman 9500
GPU cooling
Leaf Blower + Air Wick Scented candle.
OS
Vista x64
Monitor
....CRT....
GSingh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #16 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
ghost2501's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 555

Rep: 44 ghost2501 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 40
Trader Rating: 9
Default

Download everest or a memory benchmarking tool and check both for an increase. That is the only real way to check for any increase in performance like I said once you are into winidows there is to actual way or program that will tell you you have 333 mch latch. Also there is no actual formula or quantative value where the mch latch fits in. Its an internal NB deal that is still a little confusing to me sometimes. I really dont like the gigabyte way of doing it A,B,C,D etc. But now I know what it is its not really important as long as you are stable and nowadays everyone is going to use 333 or 400 basically.

But like I said I am at 4GHZ on an E8400 and 1600 7-7-6-18 on my mushkins I can still boot up and pass every stress test with 200,266,333,and 400 MCH latch. The match works out so I can still have 1600 on all 4 so I tried it, leading to more of my confusion when they all worked.
__________________
System: My System
CPU
i7 920
Motherboard
P6T6 WS REVOLUTION
Memory
12G Corsair Dominator 1600
Graphics Card
GTX 275
Power Supply
Antec 850 Signature Series
Case
PCA77B
CPU cooling
120 TRUE ULTRA EXTREME LAPPED
OS
Win 7 64
Monitor
216BW

Last edited by ghost2501 : 07-01-09 at 11:14 PM
ghost2501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-09   #17 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
Ghostleader's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,054

Rep: 183 Ghostleader is acknowledged by manyGhostleader is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 144
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Actually latch is not FSB : DRAM ratio. That's what SPD is. 2.00 = 1:1 ratio which is what I want but there's two types of 2.00. One that works at 333mhz and one that works at 400mhz. But I'm actually running 475mhz which is why I was asking about which would be better.
If you run 1:1 you should use Latch 400 then you can go one "Static Read Value" (Performance Level, tRD) step lower then with Latch 333.

About the same bandwidth but lower latency.
__________________
Asus Rampage Extreme Overclocking Guide
Running SLI on a Rampage Formula
Running SLI on a Rampage Extreme

Test Rig
Asus Rampage Extreme 0403/1104 / E8600 / 4x1 Corsair Dominator PC-14400 1800C7 (Micron D9GTR) / EVGA GTX 285 FTW / Windows 7 RC 64-Bit

System: Gaming Rig
CPU
Q9650 @ 4050 9 x 450
Motherboard
ASUS Rampage Formula BIOS 0902
Memory
2x2 OCZ Blade LV PC-9600 @ 1200 555 15 Strong tRD6
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD4890 Vapor-X in CrossFireX
Hard Drive
WD Raptor 150Gb
Sound Card
Supreme FX II
Power Supply
Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W
Case
Antec 1200
CPU cooling
Watercooling
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
XP SP2 32-bit / Win 7 RC 64-bit
Monitor
Samsung 2243BW @ 1680x1050
Ghostleader is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fsb, ga-ep45-ud3r, gmch, latch, spd


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.16211 seconds with 8 queries