|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Operating Systems > Linux, Unix | |
[FAQ] How-to compile a custom kernel
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Photography nut
![]() |
Yes, you no longer need to run: "make dep", "make modules", and "make clean". Just "make" which takes care of most of it now, but still need to run "make modules_install" and "make bzImage". Also you can still run "make install" but I like to do that step myself.
__________________
"UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because that policy would also keep them from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn Try out the latest Programming Challenge Quote:
CPU-Z Validation @ 2.97-prime95 stable 16 hours @ 1.48v Proof | CPU-Z Validation @ 3.15 Getting Mouse Side Buttons to work in Linux, Compile a custom Kernel, More
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 240
Rep: 15
![]() Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
|
I noticed that the "make" command actually generates a bzImage file as well. Do we really need to run it again?
__________________
Anonymous does not forgive. "Deciding between a Republican and a Democrat is like being picky about the flavor of the Kool-aid that Jim Jones is offering you." - me Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Photography nut
![]() |
I like to run it to make the image at the very end. Its really up to you. I just know my way has worked for me, so I'll continue to stick to it.
__________________
"UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because that policy would also keep them from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn Try out the latest Programming Challenge Quote:
CPU-Z Validation @ 2.97-prime95 stable 16 hours @ 1.48v Proof | CPU-Z Validation @ 3.15 Getting Mouse Side Buttons to work in Linux, Compile a custom Kernel, More
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 240
Rep: 15
![]() Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
|
I hear that. And I am just getting myself a nic...I've been battling with various compilations of 2.6.21.3 for 2 days without progress. I can only guess that my ability to get the onboard working in 2.4.33.3 was either A) an halucination or b) a fluke where a driver for a different network interface saw it briefly. Either seems about as likely at this point, and I won't spend another day spitting and damning at my PC.
__________________
Anonymous does not forgive. "Deciding between a Republican and a Democrat is like being picky about the flavor of the Kool-aid that Jim Jones is offering you." - me Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 240
Rep: 15
![]() Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
|
I am not absolutely certain, but I am 99% there, that one of the lines of code here is inadequate for upgrading from a 2.4 kernel to 2.6.21.3. Yu suggested we run
code: Quote:
code: Quote:
__________________
Anonymous does not forgive. "Deciding between a Republican and a Democrat is like being picky about the flavor of the Kool-aid that Jim Jones is offering you." - me Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
sweet guide hobo. aia've never got round to compiling my own kernel as i thought it would pwn my *nix skills all over but it actually seems kinda easy once you laid it out in a quality faq.
Still don't know if i need to bother rolling my own as arch is plenty fast as is but i should do for the experience. Which config do you prefer? I'm leaning towards qconfig seeing as im running kde but i suppose it doesn't matter much really. Oh yeah nerarly forgot rep+ for a damn fine guide(As always )
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Photography nut
![]() |
I usually use gconfig. I think I've tryied qconfig on Slack before and it gave me an error, so I've just always stuck to using gconfig. It doesn't really matter though. They all get the job done.
__________________
"UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because that policy would also keep them from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn Try out the latest Programming Challenge Quote:
CPU-Z Validation @ 2.97-prime95 stable 16 hours @ 1.48v Proof | CPU-Z Validation @ 3.15 Getting Mouse Side Buttons to work in Linux, Compile a custom Kernel, More
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Should it not read menu.lst not menu.list? Is it called that in Slackware?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Heh. The only reason I ever compile a kernel anymore is because it's a better memory tester than memtest86.
__________________ If you start getting "signal 11" errors then your RAM timings are too tight or something doesn't have enough voltage. Or you just got defective RAM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Linux Lobbyist
![]() |
i can verify these compile directions do work on other *nix's, but it doesn't seem to work on ubuntu...
__________________
There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks. never go as5 to mouth ASrock[/COLOR] Pro/Extreme/Deluxe/SuperComputer club, P55 and X58 welcome[/B]"]http://www.overclock.net/intel-motherboards/588268-asrock-pro-extreme-deluxe-supercomputer-club.html Xeon Glory
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|