Overclock.net › Mega Man › USS CLM8-1701
  • 6190 views

USS CLM8-1701

Rig type Gaming Rig
Description still tweaking.... Quad fire !~ 7970 8350
Status I Own It
Last updated Oct 15, 2013 at 1:22 am

Photos (9)

Components

ComponentPrice PaidAvailable From 
$199.99 (USD)
from: MicroCenter
$199.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$409.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$420.99 (USD)
from: NCIX
$313 (USD)
from: Used
$319 (USD)
from: Used
$118.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$89.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$89.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$79.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$129.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$11.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$79.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$229.99 (USD)
from: Frozencpu
$154.99 (USD)
from: Swiftech
$200 (USD)
from: OCN
Amazon.com
$0.00 (USD)
from: OCN
$0.00 (USD)
from: OCN
$154.99 (USD)
from: Swiftech
$154.99 (USD)
from: Swiftech
$52.19 (USD)
from: Frozencpu
$35 (USD)
from: OCN Marketplace
$30 (USD)
from: OCN Marketplace
$143.99 (USD)
from: Frozencpu
$39.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$120 (USD)
from: OCN Marketplace
$99.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$39.99 (USD)
from: Microsoft
$239.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$239.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$239.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$299.99 (USD)
from: NCIX
$179.99 (USD)
from: Newegg
$199.99 (USD)
from: NCIX
$385 (USD)
from: OCN
$99.99 (USD)
from: China
Amazon.com
Audio
Sony 2.1
$20 (USD)
from: Garage sale
$159.99 (USD)
from: Microcenter
$199.99 (USD)
from: NCIX
Total cost of this Rig: $6,184.91 (USD)

Benchmarks

3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
9,752
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6664211
Comments:highest physics i have seen on a 8350@!~
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
14,634
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6607044
Comments:done in windows 8 so physics is crap
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
11,001
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6361491
Comments:my first gpu in single mode ( prolly can push this higher but i am lazy ) 1235/1875
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
11,118
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6363400
Comments:second gpu single mode 1255/1835
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
14,125
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6362939
Comments:Forgot to add to my results a second that came really close to this score is below with my name on it in case of disbelievers
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
14,111
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6363659
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
14,857
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6607125
Comments:done in windows 8 so physics is crap
3DMark 11

Compared to all user scores (3465)

Score:
Worst
0
11,519
Best
100,000,000,000,000,003,860,899,428,741,951,440,279,402,051,491,350,438,954,423,829,568,577,391,016,492,742,670,197,391,754,543,170,343,555,750,902,863,155,030,391,327,289,536,708,508,823,166,797,373,630,632,400,726,786,048
Certificate:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6640467
Comments:my personal Best single GPU score !~ modded bios @1.4v vcore, 50%

Comments (8)

13236.7 MHz? That's a world record!
hahahahahaha i didnt see that ill change that !~
Fixed...... also added my new gfx
Your Gpu scores for 2 cards is very low, especially for 2 7970's with those high clocks, either driver issues or low voltage
or just unstable lol
where'd you get that radiator bracket? I bet it's cheaper than replacing my case to accommodate a 240 radiator
This is still a very keen build in 2016. :D
Overclock.net › Mega Man › USS CLM8-1701