Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA > NVIDIA Drivers and Overclocking Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-01-09   #1 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
redphoenix's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5

Rep: 1 redphoenix Unknown
Unique Rep: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Cool Has Win 7 forceware less artifacts than XP when OCing ?!

I always took it for granted that when i find my perfect overclocking speeds that exhibit no artifacts those numbers would be the same across any operating system i got, but boy was i in for a surprise lately when i checked out of boredom that i could increase the gpu speed in Win7 by 40mhz more than in XP before Ati Tool starts to detect artifacts again.

Although i am pleasantly surprised, and although Win7 still is a bit slower in most games even with the extra 40mhz, i am more baffled as to why on earth my forceware drivers in Win7 seem to be less artifact prone than in XP

I am using the 191.03 drivers now and i tried older drivers such as 186.18 and i got the same results throughout

I have no idea why this is the case

But it would be nice to hear if someone has an idea about this strange story, perhaps others can bump the OC in win7 also

according to Ati Tool 0.27, i get those artifact-free speeds on my GTS 250

on xp : 780/1950/1125
on Win7 : 820/1950/1125
__________________
System: Phoenix
CPU
E7500@3.8 C2D
Motherboard
Gigabyte G31M
Memory
2x2gb DDR2-800
Graphics Card
GTS 250 512mb
Hard Drive
WD Caviar 320gb
Sound Card
Realtek
Power Supply
500W
Case
Black
CPU cooling
Noctua NH-U12P
GPU cooling
custom 5 fan rig
OS
XP
Monitor
LG 19"TFT

Last edited by redphoenix : 10-01-09 at 05:53 PM Reason: added more info
redphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-09   #2 (permalink)
V'mod Squad VP
 
PizzaMan's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 2,976

Rep: 295 PizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven member
Unique Rep: 167
Folding Team Rank: 186
Trader Rating: 10
Default

The few times I've pushed my cards really hard in W7 I wasn't able to go as high as I could in XP. This is prbly due to the fact that I was pushing for Vantage in W7 compared to 3D06 in XP.

Can't really think of any reason why W7 would let you go further. OC stability is really more hardware then software. I would suspect that if your artifacting at those speeds in XP then its really not stable in W7. ATITool may just be less effective at detecting the instability in W7. Just a guess really.
__________________
____________________________
.:|Official|Volt|Mod|Squad|Member|:.



System: Split Open and Melt
CPU
Q6600 3.6Ghz (testing)
Motherboard
Striker II 780i
Memory
2x1GB OCZ Plats
Graphics Card
9600GT SLi 875/2150/1000
Hard Drive
Seagate 250GB, 32MB cache, 7200RPM
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair TX650
Case
ANTEC|NINE HUNDRED
CPU cooling
ZEROTherm Nirvana
GPU cooling
Switech MCW60/Maze 4
Monitor
Synaps 15" LCD, 20" Compaq
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions 1 Million+ Folding at Home points
PizzaMan is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-09   #3 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
redphoenix's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5

Rep: 1 redphoenix Unknown
Unique Rep: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Default

ok thx Pizzaman

so this is the update for this story

i no longer think it is a OS/forceware issue, i think it's an ati tool issue

first, after i read that ati tool has 'old' and 'new scanning' methods, i tested it with the old and in xp it started to tell me that my gpu limit is now 800 instead of 780.

so as i was googling around i discovered that ati tool is no longer supported and got replaced by GpuTool a more modern and up to date alternative scanner.

i tested with GpuTool and now i get a constant read across both XP and WIN7 of a max artifact free limit of 840 for my GTS 250.

so i guess it was an issue with the accuracy of the scans of old Ati Tool on my newer GTS 250.

i'm using the new stable gpu limits found by GpuTool and so far my system hasn't crash or shown signs of artifacts that my eyes could pick up.

so i guess the end of this mystery story comes with a lesson to not trust Ati Tool so much these days hehe
__________________
System: Phoenix
CPU
E7500@3.8 C2D
Motherboard
Gigabyte G31M
Memory
2x2gb DDR2-800
Graphics Card
GTS 250 512mb
Hard Drive
WD Caviar 320gb
Sound Card
Realtek
Power Supply
500W
Case
Black
CPU cooling
Noctua NH-U12P
GPU cooling
custom 5 fan rig
OS
XP
Monitor
LG 19"TFT
redphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-09   #4 (permalink)
nVidia Enthusiast
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 134

Rep: 3 Al8888 Unknown
Unique Rep: 3
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Well u got a max core clock speed of 780 before it started artifacting and i suppose this isnt too much as i was able to get around 805 or 810 easily and i use xp.
__________________
System: Gaming Sys.
CPU
E7500@2.93 Ghz
Motherboard
Intel DG41RQ
Memory
Kingston 2GB DDR2
Graphics Card
MSI N250 GTS DDR3(1GB)
Hard Drive
Seagate 250 GB SATA 7200.12
Power Supply
400W
OS
Win XP Home 32 bit
Al8888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.13457 seconds with 8 queries