Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-09   #61 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
brettjv's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali Native in AZ
Posts: 2,567

Rep: 317 brettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven member
Unique Rep: 230
Trader Rating: 1
Default

The point is not to say 'this is what you then must game at', the point is that it could be INFORMATIVE, because it drastically drops the vram requirement. I'm not going to tell you to TRY something like lowering your settings just to go 'oh well, that's what you need to play at' ... I don't hang around to be useless to people here

Basically, other than the numbers as a whole both seeming a bit lower than they should be, what you describe happening (meaning the 1/2 the fps at 1600 vs 800) is generally what one would expect to happen ... so it's not terribly informative. If you are seeing no difference in frames in WH with SLI on or off (btw, you should always restart after toggling this setting), I'm leaning towards one of the two cards simply not coming 'on' even when sli is on. I would monitor temps while doing a stress test w/the latest furmark and see whether both gpu's stay within a couple degrees of one another ... or not.

Unfortunately, I have zero experience using the g80/g92 cards in DX10, the only card I've actually ever used in dx10 is my 295, so I'm maybe not the best person to help you out on this. I'm just suggesting what I would try without actually knowing whether or not what you're seeing in terms of frames are normal or not. For all I know, the 9x00 series might just stink at dx10 and there's no other explanation (or steps) necessary.
__________________
3dMark06: 26,490
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11655839

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcooper56 View Post
really i don't think overclocking will be worth the risk for me i rather play it safe and upgrade my graphics card every year and cpu instead of overclocking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artas1984 View Post
Indeed, because half of OCN are half-whits like you, and this thread just prooves it.

System: it's a big machine
CPU
i920 D0 @ 4.0GHz (200x20, 1.25V +ht -turbo)
Motherboard
gigabyte ex58-ud4p
Memory
3 x 2GB corsair xms3 PC12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz)
Graphics Card
gtx295 co-op@712/1512/2484 + 8800gts 512mb physx
Hard Drive
raptor X,2x320gb caviar(raid 0), 1tb spinpoint
Sound Card
x-fi titanium pci-ex
Power Supply
cm realpower 850W (12V@64A)
Case
cm storm sniper
CPU cooling
cm V8 (33 idle, 55 load)
GPU cooling
stock
OS
xp sp2 / se7en 64 rc
Monitor
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200)

Last edited by brettjv : 05-19-09 at 02:10 AM
brettjv is online now Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-09   #62 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,041

Rep: 106 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 82
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv View Post
what you describe happening (meaning the 1/2 the fps at 1600 vs 800) is generally what one would expect to happen
The odd thing is though, this doesn't happen in Crysis. In Crysis I get 31 with 1600x1200 and I get like 48 with 800x600. (Not twice).

I was just playing around in Warhead with disabling and enabling Streaming Textures and I get no difference. Not even 1 FPS.

I also set Textures to "Gamer" and no difference.
However setting Textures to "Mainstream" gave me 5 more FPS.
Does this tell you anything? Looks to me like Warhead is extremely VRAM intensive (at high resolutions)
This means that 1680x1050 and above resolution most likely need 1GB of VRAM to max out Warhead.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch

Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 05-19-09 at 03:58 AM
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-09   #63 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,311

Rep: 31 SSJ5Broli is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 22
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Just wait ... wait ... wait... buy 2x GTX 300's when they come out ... Profit....
__________________
System: Desktop
CPU
Q6600 @ 3.49GHz @ 1.464v
Motherboard
MSI nForce P7N 750 SLI
Memory
2x2GB G.Skill
Graphics Card
EVGA 9800 GX2 700/1750/1100
Hard Drive
Raid 0 2x250GB
Sound Card
Sound Blaster Audigy SE 5.1
Power Supply
750 Watts Ultra Lifetime Series Pro
Case
Apevia Jupiter Jr.
CPU cooling
Intel Raidmax Maxcool
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Vista Home Premium 64 bit
Monitor
Viewsonic VX2835wm 28" 1920 x 1200
SSJ5Broli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-09   #64 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,041

Rep: 106 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 82
Trader Rating: 15
Default

I finally got some results by upgrading to the new 185.85 drivers. But it still seems a little low. It's all Enthusiast settings (even though it says Custom). Is anyone with a 9800GX2 getting the same results?


System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-09   #65 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
Meta-Prometheus's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 72

Rep: 4 Meta-Prometheus Unknown
Unique Rep: 4
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I get around 30 fps in Warhead with Enthusiast DX10 2xAA 1680x1050 and no Vsync on my GTX 275. I think the 190+ drivers help with AA, at least that I have read on some of the threads. Their is one custom config I know of for Warhead, it's CCC Warhead. I don't use it myself but I would say try it out.

System: ForeThought
CPU
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 E0 | 4.264Ghz | 1.376V
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R [Rev1.1,F5 Bios]
Memory
4GB Corsair DDR2-1066Mhz | 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
BFG GeForce GTX 275 OC 896MB @ 698c|1566s|1242m
Hard Drive
WD 320GB SATA | WD 250GB IDE
Sound Card
Onboard - Realtek HD
Power Supply
OCZ GameXStream 700w
Case
Lian Li Lancool
CPU cooling
Prolimatech Megahalems | Scythe S-FLEX SFF21G FDB
GPU cooling
Reference
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit
Monitor
Westinghouse 24" 1920x1200
Meta-Prometheus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
9800 gx2, 9800gx2, crysis warhead, dx10, dx9


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.13885 seconds with 9 queries