Originally Posted by Viperelite

Umm. My 3.0 Ghz AMD X2 plays multiplayer games really well over 160 FPS in CSS and 45 FPS in Crysis.

Edit : I dont like Intel cus they are like twice the cost for 15% better performance.

Originally Posted by Shane1244

It did for me, I had a 5400+ and a 8800GS and it was severally bottle necked, I got huge improvements switching to a C2D.

For instance, My 5400+ could only get 151.56 FPS in the CSS benchmark no matter what card I used, I tried 7900GT, 7900GTSLI, 8800GS, 8800GS SLI, 4850, GTX 280, All the same results.

The AMD X2's bottleneck most cards, especially when your playing Multiplayer games.

Originally Posted by xHassassin

That's because you're using a 1440x900?

Originally Posted by Shane1244

1280*1024, He's running 1366*768, so I don't understand where you going with this? He's even more CPU bound then me.

Originally Posted by xHassassin

Oh lol, It said 32" so I assumed it was high enough res.
Still, CPU bottlenecking won't cause that significant of a fps drop as he says it does.

Originally Posted by Shane1244

Your CPU.

Originally Posted by Shane1244

161.. That's it?

With my X2 I got 151.56 for the benchmark,
With my C2D, I got 346.98. I peaked over 700FPS.

X2's are slow for multilayer games, As for Crysis, It's GPU Bound, so you won't see much bottlenecking in it, Unless you in a 16+ Server.

My e7300 was $90, and it got me a 228% Increase.

Originally Posted by Ladiesman101

"Thats it?"
I easily peak over 100fps if i enable over 300 in css w stock e8400 and a gtx 260/216
so dont sai tahts it
i maxxed out fps in 1680:1050 16aa 16as in css @ 1134 fps