Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-01-09   #41 (permalink)
4.104GHz
 
intel ati

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,298

Rep: 739 Blameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 518
Trader Rating: 6
Default

The 275 and 280 are very close. Get which ever is cheaper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by azcrazy View Post
yea but u have to remember that 275 is a 55NM and 280 is a 65NM card, so it should use less electicity and lower temps as well
55nm also has more leakage and less die area (meaning higher power/heat density), so the power/temp difference is pretty minimal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
I've seen some benchmarks the 275 GTX outperforms the 280 GTX. I'll choose the 275 GTX because it uses less power than the 280 GTX.
Same number of shaders + high potental shader clock = higher performance in shader limited games.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kilrbe3 View Post
GTX 275 OC beats a GTX 280, hands down.
You can OC both cards, and there are certainly games where an OCed 280 will beat an OCed 275.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kilrbe3 View Post
Actually, Yes. I benched my 275 OC highly to FTW speeds, and a little over. And beat a mild OC 285. IF you just go off what websites tell you, then i don't know what to tell you, Have to much money? Just because it looks better, it always aint.
Yeah, and I had an OC on my vanilla 65nm 260 that would match a stock 280. Doesn't mean the 260 is a faster card.

Now clock the 285 to the same speeds as your 275.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post
Yep when a 4870X2 is the same price.
I paid $185 (USD) for my GTX285, but that was a one time deal.

So, I generally agree. I would not have bought a 285 if it was full price.
__________________
System: Primary System
CPU
SLBEJ 3849B202 @ 4.1GHz, 216x19, 1.232v, HT On
Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-EX58-UD3R
Memory
4x1GiB mixed 1333 @ 1300, 7-7-7-20-T1, 1.5v
Graphics Card
ASUS 5850 @ 950/1275, 1.262v
Hard Drive
2x 7200.12 500GB, 2x 7200.10 250GB, single platter
Sound Card
Razer Barracuda AC-1
Power Supply
Enermax Modu82+ 625w
Case
Antec P182
CPU cooling
TRUE (lapped) + Panaflo FBA12G12H1BX
GPU cooling
Zalman VF2000 + Enzotech VRM sinks
OS
Windows 7 Professional x64
Monitor
ASUS VW222U
Blameless is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #42 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
Conley's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,351

Rep: 90 Conley is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 81
Folding Team Rank: 752
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Not another flamewar.

The GTX 275 overclocks to speeds faster than GTX 280 because of the 55nm architecture vs 65nm on the GTX 280. It also usually performs better at stock, though I'm not sure why.

GTX 280 was discontinued for a reason. The GTX 275 replaces it, and runs faster too.

I spent forever researching this, because I was in the same dilemma a while ago.
__________________
Love TF2? Play on the OCN TF2 Server! - 68.232.173.130:27015

System: Conley's Computer
CPU
Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.3GHz (1.296V)
Motherboard
Biostar TA790GX XE
Memory
G.Skill 4GB (2x2GB) @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
XFX GTX 275 @ 713/1566/1224
Hard Drive
Seagate 7200RPM 250GB + WD 7200RPM 320GB(external)
Sound Card
X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Power Supply
Rosewill 550W
Case
Antec Three Hundred
CPU cooling
Stock (for now)
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor
AOC 2216Sw 22"
Conley is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #43 (permalink)
4.104GHz
 
intel ati

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,298

Rep: 739 Blameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famousBlameless is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 518
Trader Rating: 6
Default

[quote=Conley;6583113]
The GTX 275 overclocks to speeds faster than GTX 280 because of the 55nm architecture vs 65nm on the GTX 280.[QUOTE=Conley;6583113]

Yes, the 275 will certainly OC to higher speeds. However, where fill rate, texturing, and memory bandwidth are concerned, the 280 still wins, because it has more ROPs, more TMUs, and a higher bus width.

The 275 does have a decisive advantage in shader performance, and this is very important. Still, shader performance is not everything, and there are situations where memory or ROPs will be the limiting factor, and in these situations, the 280 will be faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conley View Post
It also usually performs better at stock, though I'm not sure why.
It has a ~200MHz faster shader clock out of the box, and the same number of shaders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conley View Post
GTX 280 was discontinued for a reason.
Because 65nm GPUs cost more to make than 55nm.
__________________
System: Primary System
CPU
SLBEJ 3849B202 @ 4.1GHz, 216x19, 1.232v, HT On
Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-EX58-UD3R
Memory
4x1GiB mixed 1333 @ 1300, 7-7-7-20-T1, 1.5v
Graphics Card
ASUS 5850 @ 950/1275, 1.262v
Hard Drive
2x 7200.12 500GB, 2x 7200.10 250GB, single platter
Sound Card
Razer Barracuda AC-1
Power Supply
Enermax Modu82+ 625w
Case
Antec P182
CPU cooling
TRUE (lapped) + Panaflo FBA12G12H1BX
GPU cooling
Zalman VF2000 + Enzotech VRM sinks
OS
Windows 7 Professional x64
Monitor
ASUS VW222U
Blameless is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #44 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
Conley's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,351

Rep: 90 Conley is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 81
Folding Team Rank: 752
Trader Rating: 1
Default

That's all true, but in almost every review, I see the GTX 275 winning at stock versus the GTX 280.

55nm also runs cooler than 65nm.

EDIT: Here's one of the most recent reviews I can find. GTX 275 edges GTX 280 by about 50 frames total. That margin will increase once overclocking comes into play.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...n,2326-16.html
__________________
Love TF2? Play on the OCN TF2 Server! - 68.232.173.130:27015

System: Conley's Computer
CPU
Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.3GHz (1.296V)
Motherboard
Biostar TA790GX XE
Memory
G.Skill 4GB (2x2GB) @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
XFX GTX 275 @ 713/1566/1224
Hard Drive
Seagate 7200RPM 250GB + WD 7200RPM 320GB(external)
Sound Card
X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Power Supply
Rosewill 550W
Case
Antec Three Hundred
CPU cooling
Stock (for now)
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor
AOC 2216Sw 22"
Conley is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #45 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
stevenma188's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London, ON
Posts: 868

Rep: 64 stevenma188 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 58
Folding Team Rank: 373
Trader Rating: 4
Default

It's all up to what resolution you will be gaming at. If you are gaming beyond 1920 x 1200, get the GTX 280. Otherwise the GTX 275. Same thing applies if you like to crank up AA and antisophic filtering, as those things take up more vmem.

System: Wavemaster
CPU
Q6600 G0 @ 3.7Ghz 1.440V
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
Memory
2x 2GB Patriot PDC24G6400LLK
Graphics Card
Asus EAH 4890 TOP (eVGA 9800GT SC as secondary)
Hard Drive
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB + Seagate 320 GB
Power Supply
OCZ StealthXstream 600 Watt
Case
Cooler Master Wavemaster
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S1283
GPU cooling
Asus Twin Fan / Thermaltake DuOrb
OS
Microsoft Vista Ultimate 64 SP1
Monitor
Dell 22" LCD + LG 19" LCD
stevenma188 is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #46 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
kilrbe3's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 2,310

Rep: 111 kilrbe3 is acknowledged by manykilrbe3 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 102
Folding Team Rank: 994
Hardware Reviews: 2
Trader Rating: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conley View Post
Not another flamewar.

The GTX 275 overclocks to speeds faster than GTX 280 because of the 55nm architecture vs 65nm on the GTX 280. It also usually performs better at stock, though I'm not sure why.

GTX 280 was discontinued for a reason. The GTX 275 replaces it, and runs faster too.

I spent forever researching this, because I was in the same dilemma a while ago.
Spot on, someone has done their research on the 275 I see

Well done my apprentice
(Yes Im watching Star wars on spike )
__________________
System: Friggg
CPU
Q9650 4.0Ghz 1.296v
Motherboard
eVGA 750i FTW SLi
Memory
MUSHKIN DDR2 800 4GB 2.1v
Graphics Card
eVGA GTX 275 @ 713/1584/1260
Hard Drive
320GB
Sound Card
Creative X-Fi
Power Supply
CORSAIR 1000HX
Case
CoolerMaster HAF932
CPU cooling
Apogee GTZ
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit
Monitor
LG 21.6" inch
kilrbe3 is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #47 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
sgdude's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 5,108

Rep: 365 sgdude is a proven membersgdude is a proven membersgdude is a proven membersgdude is a proven member
Unique Rep: 302
Trader Rating: 2
Default

they are pretty similar. If you are gonna OC-GTX 275. if you arent, GTX280. As the 275 will oc a good amount higher, but out of the box its only clocked slightly higher. I got the GTX 275, but thats just because the 280 is EOL so i couldnt step up to it.
Either card is great though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tator Tot View Post
the trick is getting them to think that you are different and have something to offer besides your junk, then let them fall prey to you super p***s and be ensnared for life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sccr64472 View Post
Game developers haven't jumped onto the PhysX bandwagon, so finding software that incorporates PhysX is nearly as hard as finding an untouched cake at fat camp

System: TH3 GR33N MACHIN3
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
EVGA 650i Ultra
Memory
4x1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400
Graphics Card
EVGA GTX 275
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 320 GB 7200.10
Sound Card
SB X-Fi Xtreme Audio
Power Supply
Antec True Power Trio 550W
Case
Apevia X-Gear (green)
CPU cooling
Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Windows Vista Home Premium x64 SP2
Monitor
Samsung 226BW
sgdude is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-09   #48 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
brettjv's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali Native in AZ
Posts: 2,498

Rep: 313 brettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven memberbrettjv is a proven member
Unique Rep: 226
Trader Rating: 1
Default

The 275 doesn't overclock higher solely because it is a 55nm part vs the 65nm 280. It overclocks higher because the smaller fab size allows nvidia to put more voltage through it while still generating similar amounts of heat. It is the voltage increase that provides the higher OC headroom.

Why do you think that people seek out the 65nm version of the gtx260 216? It's because it has the software programmable voltage regulator, along with a better heatsink, and with this combination of features, one can coax a better OC out of the 65nm part.

Saying that 55nm parts OC better than 65nm parts is a over-simplification of the situation. GPU voltage, along with the GPU cooling system's capabilities, factor heavily into this equation.
__________________
3dMark06: 26,490
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11655839

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcooper56 View Post
really i don't think overclocking will be worth the risk for me i rather play it safe and upgrade my graphics card every year and cpu instead of overclocking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artas1984 View Post
Indeed, because half of OCN are half-whits like you, and this thread just prooves it.

System: it's a big machine
CPU
i920 D0 @ 4.0GHz (200x20, 1.25V +ht -turbo)
Motherboard
gigabyte ex58-ud4p
Memory
3 x 2GB corsair xms3 PC12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz)
Graphics Card
gtx295 co-op@712/1512/2484 + 8800gts 512mb physx
Hard Drive
raptor X,2x320gb caviar(raid 0), 1tb spinpoint
Sound Card
x-fi titanium pci-ex
Power Supply
cm realpower 850W (12V@64A)
Case
cm storm sniper
CPU cooling
cm V8 (33 idle, 55 load)
GPU cooling
stock
OS
xp sp2 / se7en 64 rc
Monitor
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200)

Last edited by brettjv : 07-01-09 at 11:03 PM
brettjv is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-09   #49 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
Conley's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,351

Rep: 90 Conley is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 81
Folding Team Rank: 752
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv View Post
The 275 doesn't overclock higher solely because it is a 55nm part vs the 65nm 280. It overclocks higher because the smaller fab size allows nvidia to put more voltage through it while still generating similar amounts of heat. It is the voltage increase that provides the higher OC headroom.

Why do you think that people seek out the 65nm version of the gtx260 216? It's because it has the software programmable voltage regulator, along with a better heatsink, and with this combination of features, one can coax a better OC out of the 65nm part.

Saying that 55nm parts OC better than 65nm parts is a over-simplification of the situation. GPU voltage, along with the GPU cooling system's capabilities, factor heavily into this equation.
Yes, and unless a company is going for an energy saving card, they're going to take advantage of the ability to put extra voltage in to it. It should be obvious that a better cooling system will generate better results. That's just common sense.

Thank you for explaining it more thoroughly, though.
__________________
Love TF2? Play on the OCN TF2 Server! - 68.232.173.130:27015

System: Conley's Computer
CPU
Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.3GHz (1.296V)
Motherboard
Biostar TA790GX XE
Memory
G.Skill 4GB (2x2GB) @ 1066MHz 5-5-5-15
Graphics Card
XFX GTX 275 @ 713/1566/1224
Hard Drive
Seagate 7200RPM 250GB + WD 7200RPM 320GB(external)
Sound Card
X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Power Supply
Rosewill 550W
Case
Antec Three Hundred
CPU cooling
Stock (for now)
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor
AOC 2216Sw 22"
Conley is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-09   #50 (permalink)
nVidia Enthusiast
 
manolith's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 897

Rep: 38 manolith is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 36
Folding Team Rank: 244
Trader Rating: 0
Default

275 faster than the 285??? Now I am very confused!
__________________
We Are Gr33n Machine

System: Gaming Rig
CPU
Q9400 @3.73ghz~1.41v 467fsb
Motherboard
evga 750i FTW
Memory
4GB OCZ DDR2 PC26400SLIready @933mhz~2.15v5-5-5-18
Graphics Card
BFG GTX 285 Overclocked in SLI
Hard Drive
500gb Hitachi 7200rpm
Sound Card
on board. optical
Power Supply
Corsair 750W
Case
Cooler Master HAF 932
CPU cooling
thermaltake bigwater 760i.
GPU cooling
stock
OS
Win7RC 64bit
manolith is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17953 seconds with 8 queries