|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA | |
***GTX295 Crysis Full HD Results***
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
![]() Greetings GTX295 Owners! Post your Crysis results here. Preferably one or two of the following settings: 1. 1920x1080, DX10, all settings "Very High", no AA 2. 1920x1080, DX10, all settings "Very High", 4x AA 3. 1920x1200, DX10, all settings "Very High", no AA 4. 1920x1200, DX10, all settings "Very High", 4x AA Don't worry if your monitor doesn't support the resolution. You can force it to scale down so it will still work. Rules 1. Make sure your computer works and is stable. 2. State which company and overclock you have on your card. 3. Make sure you have the 186.18 or later driver installed. 4. Make sure you have the latest Crysis patch installed. (Version 1.21 or just 1.2 is fine). 5. Crysis Warhead results are also accepted with the above settings. 6. You must provide a screenshot of GPUz and the benchmark tool once the result is done. (Use Print Screen and paste into Paint then save it and upload it) Download Links 1. Crysis Patch 1.2: Click Here 2. Crysis Patch 1.21: Click Here 3. Crysis Benchmark Tool: Click Here 4. Crysis Warhead Benchmark Tool: Click Here (Click "Download" at top-left) Let's see what these beasts can do. The following are my personal results:
Crysis ![]() Crysis Warhead ![]() Far Cry 2 ***Bonus*** ![]()
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 1 Week Ago at 11:16 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali Native in AZ
Posts: 2,557
Rep: 317
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 230
Trader Rating: 1
|
I'll get you started on this boss.
i7 920 (20x200, +HT -turbo) EVGA Co-Op 295 (712/1512/2484) w/190.38 Windows 7 64-bit RC 9/13/2009 12:12:02 AM - Vista 64 Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 47.74s, Average FPS: 41.90 Min FPS: 28.69 at frame 161, Max FPS: 53.51 at frame 869 Average Tri/Sec: -14245633, Tri/Frame: -340025 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.70 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 43.75s, Average FPS: 45.71 Min FPS: 28.69 at frame 161, Max FPS: 56.15 at frame 1014 Average Tri/Sec: -14857327, Tri/Frame: -325023 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.82 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 43.74s, Average FPS: 45.73 Min FPS: 28.69 at frame 161, Max FPS: 56.15 at frame 1014 Average Tri/Sec: -14782765, Tri/Frame: -323285 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.84 TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Beginning Run #2 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1900x1200, AA=4x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 56.96s, Average FPS: 35.11 Min FPS: 29.09 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 45.26 at frame 993 Average Tri/Sec: -11364574, Tri/Frame: -323642 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.83 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 52.95s, Average FPS: 37.77 Min FPS: 29.09 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 46.39 at frame 1013 Average Tri/Sec: -11731935, Tri/Frame: -310612 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.95 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 52.87s, Average FPS: 37.83 Min FPS: 28.84 at frame 1968, Max FPS: 46.82 at frame 1001 Average Tri/Sec: -11692152, Tri/Frame: -309097 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.97 TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 9/13/2009 12:12:02 AM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 45.72 Run #2- DX10 1900x1200 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.8 Interestingly enough, 8xAA doesn't cause all that big of a hit to my fps: 9/13/2009 12:26:51 AM - Vista 64 Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu DX10 1900x1200, AA=8x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9 Global Game Quality: VeryHigh ================================================== ============ TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 59.76s, Average FPS: 33.47 Min FPS: 27.27 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 43.14 at frame 977 Average Tri/Sec: -11238309, Tri/Frame: -335808 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.73 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 54.64s, Average FPS: 36.60 Min FPS: 27.27 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 44.46 at frame 1006 Average Tri/Sec: -11785479, Tri/Frame: -321998 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.85 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 54.69s, Average FPS: 36.57 Min FPS: 27.27 at frame 1978, Max FPS: 44.93 at frame 1010 Average Tri/Sec: -11749905, Tri/Frame: -321310 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.85 TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed) ================================================== ============ Completed All Tests <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><> 9/13/2009 12:26:51 AM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 36.585
__________________
3dMark06: 26,490 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11655839 Quote:
Last edited by brettjv : 09-13-09 at 03:33 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Very nice, brettjv. Perfect example of the post format.
Those clocks are very impressive and I think that NVIDIA happened to fix the previous huge AA FPS drop issue with their cards in the new 190 drivers. It seem that no matter how much AA you add on (after 2x), the FPS barely changes. Also very interesting that the minimum FPS didn't change at all for you from no AA to 4x AA (that is quite amazing in fact). Care to try 16xQ maybe?EDIT: Would be interesting if someone could compare this with 186.18 drivers (especially the AA test).
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 09-13-09 at 03:46 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
![]() |
Keep up the nice bench work fellas.
__________________
My reviews: 4870, 4870 Tri-fire, 4850 X2 Quad-fire, 4850 X2 vs. 4870 X2, 4850 X2 + 4870 Tri-fire, 4850 X2 + 4870 X2 Quad-fire, 4850 + 4870 Crossfire, (NEW) 4890 vs. 4850 X2 Steam nick: rico2001 "The ability to learn faster than your competitors may be only sustainable competitive advantage." ~Arie de Geus
Last edited by Robilar : 09-13-09 at 07:10 PM |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
i7 920 3.5ghz(I think, can't remember) + HT/Turbo
EVGA 295 CO-OP 700/1512/1200 Windows Vista 64bit Ultimate Drivers: 186.18
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Ah see, this is interesting. In the 186 drivers, AA takes a toll on FPS with every level. In the 190 drivers, AA takes a toll on FPS only when first added and then no matter what level you add after that, the FPS pretty much stays the same. This is quite an interesting discovery.
Thanks everyone for your benchies by the way. Keep them coming.
__________________
Last edited by Open1Your1Eyes0 : 09-13-09 at 08:25 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Update: I noticed the banner was down so I re-uploaded it and it is now back up and active.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Bump
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali Native in AZ
Posts: 2,557
Rep: 317
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 230
Trader Rating: 1
|
Quote:
__________________
3dMark06: 26,490 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11655839 Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| crysis, crysis warhead, fps, gtx 295, gtx295 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|