Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #31 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,061

Rep: 109 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 85
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebunny View Post
i think i might be a little late but i got my card rock solid at 1.13 with OC of 702/1548/1152
if this helps at all...
Always great to submit your input but so far we confirmed a safe top of 1.2V max and looking to go higher if someone OK's it.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #32 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
Clockadile Dundee's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,236

Rep: 64 Clockadile Dundee is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 48
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Always great to submit your input but so far we confirmed a safe top of 1.2V max and looking to go higher if someone OK's it.
Forgive me, but why do you need to raise the voltage? Reading through, I am confused.

Just to see if it will help the shaders OC?
__________________
KILL

System: somewhat nifty
CPU
i7 920 D0 3849B018 & 3939B108
Motherboard
E760 & P6T7 WS
Memory
Super-Talent Chrome 2000 MHz 8-8-8-24
Graphics Card
GTX 295 CoOp HydroCopper
Hard Drive
Velociraptor WD3000HLFS * 1
Sound Card
X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair 1000HX
Case
1200 + FBA12G12H
CPU cooling
Heatkiller 3.0 Cu, 1366 Backplate
GPU cooling
HydroCopper
OS
Vista x64
Monitor
LG W3000H
Clockadile Dundee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #33 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,061

Rep: 109 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 85
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clockadile Dundee View Post
Forgive me, but why do you need to raise the voltage? Reading through, I am confused.

Just to see if it will help the shaders OC?
Not only shaders, core is most important for me actually. Either way, I'd like to know what not to surpass for 24/7 voltage in order to be safe. Kinda like the idea with 1.36v being the 24/7 safe limit for 45nm Core 2 CPUs.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #34 (permalink)
Intel Overclocker
 
typoknig's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 387

Rep: 42 typoknig is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 35
Folding Team Rank: 642
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Not only shaders, core is most important for me actually. Either way, I'd like to know what not to surpass for 24/7 voltage in order to be safe. Kinda like the idea with 1.36v being the 24/7 safe limit for 45nm Core 2 CPUs.
Just don't get greedy with your OC.

As others have already pointed out...

Greed = Dead GPU

I know that I personally would not go over any voltage that would void the warranty, but if 1.2 has been confirmed safe the it is probably best to just stick with that.
__________________
System: Few Expenses Spared
CPU
I7-920 (D0) @ 4.5236 GHz HT ON 24/7 Prime95 STABLE
Motherboard
ASUS RAMPAGE II EXTREME
Memory
6 x 2GB Kingston Hyper X DDR3 2000 (7-7-7-19)
Graphics Card
2 x EVGA GTX295 RED EDITION (SLI)
Hard Drive
3 x OCZ Vertex 120GB SSD (RAID 0)
Sound Card
Supreme FX X-FI
Power Supply
Thermaltake Toughpower 1200-watt Modular PSU
Case
ANTEC 1200
CPU cooling
Heatkiller 3.0 & 3 Black Ice Radiators
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 X64 RC1
Monitor
Sharp 32" 1080p flat panel (LC-32D62U)
typoknig is offline I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #35 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
Clockadile Dundee's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,236

Rep: 64 Clockadile Dundee is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 48
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Not only shaders, core is most important for me actually. Either way, I'd like to know what not to surpass for 24/7 voltage in order to be safe. Kinda like the idea with 1.36v being the 24/7 safe limit for 45nm Core 2 CPUs.

Is it possible that there is not a published max?
__________________
KILL

System: somewhat nifty
CPU
i7 920 D0 3849B018 & 3939B108
Motherboard
E760 & P6T7 WS
Memory
Super-Talent Chrome 2000 MHz 8-8-8-24
Graphics Card
GTX 295 CoOp HydroCopper
Hard Drive
Velociraptor WD3000HLFS * 1
Sound Card
X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair 1000HX
Case
1200 + FBA12G12H
CPU cooling
Heatkiller 3.0 Cu, 1366 Backplate
GPU cooling
HydroCopper
OS
Vista x64
Monitor
LG W3000H
Clockadile Dundee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #36 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,061

Rep: 109 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 85
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clockadile Dundee View Post
Is it possible that there is not a published max?
I would be surprised if there was. That's why I'm asking you guys.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #37 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,061

Rep: 109 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 85
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Alright guys I need some help deciding. I have two options:

1. 750 MHz (Core Clock) and 1575 MHz (Shader Clock)

or

2. 775 MHz (Core Clock) and 1550 MHz (Shader Clock)

Both are stable for me so which is a better keep? This is for purely gaming purposes btw.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #38 (permalink)
V'mod Squad VP
 
PizzaMan's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 2,994

Rep: 297 PizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven member
Unique Rep: 168
Folding Team Rank: 185
Trader Rating: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Not only shaders, core is most important for me actually. Either way, I'd like to know what not to surpass for 24/7 voltage in order to be safe. Kinda like the idea with 1.36v being the 24/7 safe limit for 45nm Core 2 CPUs.
It's really a mater of opinion. Just like 1.36v being safe for 45nm Intel procs. A lot of peeps go by Intel's data sheets of 1.45v. Then there are others who argue that the 45nm process is not that much different then the 65nm and think 1.55v is safe. You're really not going to get a definitive answer. The most common factors that kill processesors, whether they be central units or GPUs, are high temps and running them unstable. Most kill their hardware running them unstable. This is why I push for max OC, make sure it's stable, then for insurance I lower clocks just a touch and stick with that for 24/7. If you run just below what you know is stable and keep your temps in check, you'll rarely kill your hardware. Just my
__________________
____________________________
.:|Official|Volt|Mod|Squad|Member|:.



System: Split Open and Melt
CPU
Q6600 3.6Ghz (testing)
Motherboard
Striker II 780i
Memory
2x1GB OCZ Plats
Graphics Card
9600GT SLi 875/2150/1000
Hard Drive
Seagate 250GB, 32MB cache, 7200RPM
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair TX650
Case
ANTEC|NINE HUNDRED
CPU cooling
ZEROTherm Nirvana
GPU cooling
Switech MCW60/Maze 4
Monitor
Synaps 15" LCD, 20" Compaq
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions 1 Million+ Folding at Home points
PizzaMan is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #39 (permalink)
Graphics Card Aficionado
 
Open1Your1Eyes0's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fair Lawn, NJ
Posts: 2,061

Rep: 109 Open1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by manyOpen1Your1Eyes0 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 85
Trader Rating: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PizzaMan View Post
It's really a mater of opinion. Just like 1.36v being safe for 45nm Intel procs. A lot of peeps go by Intel's data sheets of 1.45v. Then there are others who argue that the 45nm process is not that much different then the 65nm and think 1.55v is safe. You're really not going to get a definitive answer. The most common factors that kill processesors, whether they be central units or GPUs, are high temps and running them unstable. Most kill their hardware running them unstable. This is why I push for max OC, make sure it's stable, then for insurance I lower clocks just a touch and stick with that for 24/7. If you run just below what you know is stable and keep your temps in check, you'll rarely kill your hardware. Just my
Well in my case temps are fine no matter what so only voltage is playing into my "danger zone". I always like to account for worst case scenario. That's why I always test with 30 mins of Furmark with Xtreme Burning Mode and Post-Processing "off". There will never be anything that will run your GPU hotter and maxed out more than this.

System: The Great Destroyer
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4.25 GHz)
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1)
Memory
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800 MHz
Graphics Card
EVGA GeForce GTX295 Plus with Backplate
Hard Drive
Hitachi 500GB (RAID0)
Sound Card
Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W
Case
Antec 900 (Red on Black Paint Mod)
CPU cooling
Enzotech Sapphire Waterblock
GPU cooling
HEATKILLER® GPU-X˛ GTX295
OS
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
Monitor
Hanns-G HG-281DPB 28-Inch
Open1Your1Eyes0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #40 (permalink)
V'mod Squad VP
 
PizzaMan's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 2,994

Rep: 297 PizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven memberPizzaMan is a proven member
Unique Rep: 168
Folding Team Rank: 185
Trader Rating: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clockadile Dundee View Post
Is it possible that there is not a published max?
Sadly, just a published max temp. (105C)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 View Post
Alright guys I need some help deciding. I have two options:

1. 750 MHz (Core Clock) and 1575 MHz (Shader Clock)

or

2. 775 MHz (Core Clock) and 1550 MHz (Shader Clock)

Both are stable for me so which is a better keep? This is for purely gaming purposes btw.
Benchmark it. Use games that you play if you have BM tools for them or you can use demo features in a lot of newer games.
__________________
____________________________
.:|Official|Volt|Mod|Squad|Member|:.



System: Split Open and Melt
CPU
Q6600 3.6Ghz (testing)
Motherboard
Striker II 780i
Memory
2x1GB OCZ Plats
Graphics Card
9600GT SLi 875/2150/1000
Hard Drive
Seagate 250GB, 32MB cache, 7200RPM
Sound Card
onboard
Power Supply
Corsair TX650
Case
ANTEC|NINE HUNDRED
CPU cooling
ZEROTherm Nirvana
GPU cooling
Switech MCW60/Maze 4
Monitor
Synaps 15" LCD, 20" Compaq
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions 1 Million+ Folding at Home points
PizzaMan is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
evga, gtx 295, gtx295, voltage, voltage tuner


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.13819 seconds with 8 queries