dangerousHobo

Thats fine. I'm just one of those people that always adds the zero to the month if its a single digit.

__________________
"UNIX was never designed to keep people from doing stupid things, because that policy would also keep them from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn

Try out the latest Programming Challenge

CPU-Z Validation @ 2.97-prime95 stable 16 hours @ 1.48v Proof | CPU-Z Validation @ 3.15

Getting Mouse Side Buttons to work in Linux, Compile a custom Kernel, More

lattyware

Everyone putting the pipe symbol into the release name is just asking for trouble.

So the basic idea everyone wants is a dated release? Seems O.K.

I think we should take a leaf out of Slax's book (or old book, it appears they no longer do it) and have separate names for each version of a release. Another way to look at it is Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu style thing.

So, Undervolt could be our leightweight lead. Stock could be are standard, and Unlocked Multiplier could be our version containing Compiz and the like.

I'd vote for:
Name Release Month.Year(-rcX)
OCNix Undervolt 02.2008-rc2

__________________
Lattyware | Main (Sig) Rig: gBOX42 | Lan Rig: gLAN42
Never been convinced by Linux? Here is a challenge. | Using LVM
Scratched Disc? | Guide To LAN Parties | Writing a GUI application in Python/Glade
Etching an image into your case. | Wireless Access Points: Easy wireless networking.
A Member Of The OCN Anime/Manga Club
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Evelyn Beatrice Hall

GodofGrunts

I second lattyware's suggestion.

__________________

R3ap3R

I second Grunt's second ( I third )

mrtn400

I like lattyware's idea, but we should base the names off of something similar. Like your reference to the Ubunto distros as an example. All of the Ubuntu distros have the phrase "ubuntu" in them. So what if we named them something like Undervolt, Stockvolt, and Overvolt so that it's more obvious as to what they are (and it sounds way more cool).

__________________

version2

"rc" generally means "release candidate" which infers that a system of release organization is in place (ie alpha -> beta -> release candidate -> final). I vote for the just "r" (r = "release").

That's my opinion, anyway.

lattyware

Yeah, I put it in brackets because it would only apply when we had release candidates. I presumed we were doing that kind of system.

__________________
Lattyware | Main (Sig) Rig: gBOX42 | Lan Rig: gLAN42
Never been convinced by Linux? Here is a challenge. | Using LVM
Scratched Disc? | Guide To LAN Parties | Writing a GUI application in Python/Glade
Etching an image into your case. | Wireless Access Points: Easy wireless networking.
A Member Of The OCN Anime/Manga Club
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Evelyn Beatrice Hall