kc-tr

hmm good point lol

__________________

jrs

I run server 2003 converted by the guide on msfn or whatever it is. Some games are hard to run until you turn of DEP. Fear did not want to start until I turned off DEP. For the record cs 1.6 works on 2k3.....never had a problem with it

__________________
Watercooling
via aqua 1300, bonnie heatercore, and Apogee

Chipp

I'm 100% server right now, I'm loving it. Incredibly quick.

__________________
... wherever I may roam; where I lay my head is home ...

Electricity Explained --- Got a G15? Use ATI Tool? Check this out! --- Compilation of Free Security Utilities --- Rule #1: Obey All Rules --- E2160 @ 3400mhz, Orthos Stable

Grim

I've always disliked XP.
Without Getting into too many details, its stability pales in comparison TO W2k. It is W2k with a prittier GUI, removed/added features, and DX9 born Graphics drivers, giving it better performance with graphics.
Its overall, slower, and less stable than w2k.

So I was happy when I heard a tech friend of mine raving about Windows XP "low-cal" meaning low calorie.

Its a version of XP that has all the resource heavy crap removed, BOOTS IN SECONDS (bar goes across like 2 times I hear) and is overall as stable (or allmost) as w2k, but has the graphics performance of your normal XP.

What I'll relating is all what my friend said I must mention, But I do trust him.

I'm about DLing it now. you guys should try it out.

__________________

Message Approved By The Council For A Better Internet

Introduction to increasing your Laptop's battery life

Chosen

Great! When I first installed server 2003 I compared its fresh boot speed from bios to desktop to a fresh boot on xp pro (server was converted to workstation)
Needless to say it booted 50% faster than my xp pro installation on the same type of harddrive. I've been hooked since. Never gotten a bsod

__________________
Fourth donated by! Crash

OSAMT: "Member of OCN Songwriter and Musician Thread"

The 52 daughters -- of the revolution - turn the gold to chrome.

Grim

How's the gaming performance?

__________________

Message Approved By The Council For A Better Internet

Introduction to increasing your Laptop's battery life

Chosen

Its obviously more stable but server is a very streemlined OS its more efficent and from my experience that translates to the games running better, less lag, less choppyness and more efficent utilization of the system resources compares to xp - xp pro

__________________
Fourth donated by! Crash

OSAMT: "Member of OCN Songwriter and Musician Thread"

The 52 daughters -- of the revolution - turn the gold to chrome.

kc-tr

xp - xp pro and add x64 to that list.

__________________

Grim

Bah. I agree. XP is crap.

But I'll disagree with you here guys. XP has better gaming performance because it was created during the time period that Driver devopers were starting to uttilize DX 9. A lot of developers focused on Gaming, so the drivers were better streamlined for XP.

AS you guys are fully aware of, Win2k3 Server is a networking variant of Windows and really, its optimized for networking, I doubt developers optimized their drivers for win2003 server. (I'm speculating based on what I've benchmarked with W2k too.)

No doubt it manages resources better though.

I'd really like to see some benchs comparing WinXP and Win2003 server (grahpics benchmarks that is).

__________________

Message Approved By The Council For A Better Internet

Introduction to increasing your Laptop's battery life

Chipp

Once I'm back on my main rig I'll happily supply some before/after info. I can say that my BitTorrent habbit is much better supported on Server, as it handles my dual NEC's and seems to make much more effective use of network load balncing. I'm assumings pings will be lower in games, as well.

__________________
... wherever I may roam; where I lay my head is home ...

Electricity Explained --- Got a G15? Use ATI Tool? Check this out! --- Compilation of Free Security Utilities --- Rule #1: Obey All Rules --- E2160 @ 3400mhz, Orthos Stable