Server 2003 definitly. If you are running a server for ANYTHING other then basic local file and print shareing, use a server OS. Apart from being more secure, they offer features that simply dont exist for XP Pro. I just got done installing SBS 2003 on my Exchange server, and it is very diferant from any other MS operating system I have ever worked with.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulTa
I'm like Obi wan. I just pop in and out, offer vague comments and advice, and then tell you to use the force.
|
CPU
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2 GHz |
Motherboard
Apple MacBook Pro Stock Motherboard |
Memory
4 GB (2x 2 GB) G.Skill DDR2 667 MHz DDR2 |
Graphics Card
nVidia GeForce Go 8600 GT 128 MB |
Hard Drive
120 GB Fujitsu SATA150 |
Sound Card
Intel Sata Rosea HD Audio |
Power Supply
Apple Stock Power Adapter |
Case
15" Apple Aluminum MacBook Pro Case |
CPU cooling
Stock |
GPU cooling
Stock |
OS
OS X 10.5 Leopard / Windows XP Pro / Fedora 8 |
Monitor
15" Apple LED Backlit MacBook Pro Matt Display |
|
Server 2003 Enterprise vs. XP Pro: which is better for small web server?
03-15-06
Server 2003 Enterprise vs. XP Pro: which is better for small web server?
