|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Other Cooling Discussions | |
Thermocouple temp measurement
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
I was just looking at this review:
http://hardocp.com/article/2009/10/1...n_b_c_review/1 Seems all of the better cooler reviews use thermocouples in the IHS of the CPU to measure temps. Has anybody seen how to do this? I have access to a mill, but I don't know how deep they go, I don't want to accidentally mill the silicone.
__________________
Currently Playing updated 10/15/09 MP Shattered Horizon Borderlands | Fallout 3 + all DLC, fellout mod SP
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Intel and AMD publish data on the thickness of their IHSs.
Just find a thermocouple that's thinner. or...... See page 80 Will your mill hold a couple of 10,000ths?
__________________
EDGE ...if you're not on it, you're taking up too much space.
Last edited by billbartuska : 4 Weeks Ago at 03:27 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
![]() The tightest dimension in there is +- 1.5 thou. It's pretty rare that a part needs +- something in the ten thou's.
__________________
Currently Playing updated 10/15/09 MP Shattered Horizon Borderlands | Fallout 3 + all DLC, fellout mod SP
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
WOW thats awesome, a much better way to measuer temps during ln2 runs.
__________________
E8500-4.93Ghz on air E8500-5.5GHZ on DICE i7 920- 4.52 Ghz 9800 gx2-820Mhz
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
Quote:
"Seems all of the better cooler reviews use thermocouples in the IHS of the CPU to measure temps." Intel/AMD have specs for a dummy CPU heat source (with thermocouple) for use in evaluating various thermal solutions. These are used by aftermarket heat sink manufacturers to evaluate their products, and I assume testing labs also. The problem is that you have to sign an NDA just to see the plans, much less buy one. So, what's wrong with CoreTemp?
__________________
EDGE ...if you're not on it, you're taking up too much space.
Last edited by billbartuska : 4 Weeks Ago at 10:41 AM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
A ten thousandth of an inch isn't 10 x 1 thou, its 1 thou over 10, or 0.0001". Coretemp doesn't really work for me, I'm pretty sure that my sensors are screwed. Comparing my heat numbers at 4.05 ghz, 1.36v on an E8400 (a pretty common overclock) with a Noctua NH-U12P gives me about 70* load with an OCCT test, above 80* with Intel Burn Test. Other people using that exact same setup and OC usually get 50-60* load. So, either the sensors are wrong on my chip, or they are right and the IHS isn't installed right on my silicon. This is also after about 20 different TIM applications, with different methods and brands. The more I think bout it, the more I want to sand thru the IHS to the silicon. Because using realtemp's sensor test shows that both cores are within a few decimals of a degree of each other through the entire load range. So the only way for that to be possible with bad sensors is for both sensors to be bad, and both equally as bad. Pretty unlikely.
__________________
Currently Playing updated 10/15/09 MP Shattered Horizon Borderlands | Fallout 3 + all DLC, fellout mod SP
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Well as I see it you have 2 options....either remove the IHS completely or mill a groove in the bottom of the heatsink/ln2 pot and use a very slim thermocouple there are some pretty tiny one about even seen some very thin K probes.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|