CorporalAris

Welcome! This is my first FAQ ever, just F.Y.I. And I overdid it. I spent several hours writing this...

The main reason I am writing this FAQ is because I think that people are a little confused about what PhysX is, what it can do, and why I think it works better on GPU's than on CPU's.


Everything you wanted to know about

Things covered in this FAQ:

• What is PhysX?
• What is calculated by PhysX?
• How does a CPU process physics?
• How does a PPU process physics?
• How does a GPU process physics?
• Why are GPU's better than CPU's for physics?

What is PhysX

PhysX was originally the product of Ageia, a company based in California, which was founded in 2002. PhysX was originally designed to be a hardware physics solution. Specifically, it was sold on a PCI or PCI-E 1x style card, called a Physics Processing Unit, or PPU. It was designed to offload the physics calculations from the main Central Processing Unit, allowing the CPU to focus on other things, resulting in a higher framerate in video games. Also, since the PPU was dedicated to handling physics calculations, physics based effects became more accurate and often had more physics based objects flying about. The Ageia PPU was a large parallel processor, similar to a Graphics Processing Unit, or GPU.

I personally like this quote very much, from nVidia.com:


Physics is becoming a more and more important part of video games lately. New technologies, such as Digital Molecular Matter, or DMM, and Endorphin Real-Time animation, all need extensive use of physics engines. There are hundreds of uses for physics in games, but lets cover a few of them.


When something in a video game explodes, you usually see several things happening. You see sparks, gibs (parts of the original model), flames, bodies, dust, etc ALL go flying in different directions. The physics software must calculate the velocity, mass, shape, hitbox, and type of EACH gib you see flying. So if a door flies off a vehicle, the physics engine has to calculate every single movement for each Frame Per Second, or FPS.


Sparks, or particle effects, each have to be calculated for velocity, distance, and type.


Volumetric Smoke or Clouds or Dust have to be calculated for speed, density, wind, nearby force, etc. You can already see things adding up here. You have millions of calculations going on for each little thing to make it look realistic.


When Ragdolls are calculated, each bone in the body is connected by a joint, which has resistance. The bone can't pass through other bones, and it can't pass through physical walls. But you don't want the body to go completely limp. He has to have motion, perhaps the direction of his last damage.

I could simply go on and on, but the thing is, physics are an extremely important part of video games. Just imagine Half-Life 2 with out physics! Each and everyone of these things is calculated at nearly the same time.

How does a CPU process physics?

To start this, I need to explain how CPU's process's. I'll be basic, because this is a little confusing, even to me. Essentially, all CPU's work like so. An instruction is given from memory, or input, the instruction is decoded, the instruction is executed, and then the result is placed back into memory, or output. The exact keywords are: fetch, decode, execute, and writeback.

Now, since EVERYTHING that happens on a computer is sent through a processor, EVERYTHING MUST DO THIS. Per processor core, ONE instruction can be processed at a time, so all other instructions must wait their turn, depending on their priority. This is called, I believe, In Order Execution.

We just covered how many calculations go on per second, and we know that a LOT of them happen in a second. Each single one of those calculations must wait it's turn in line, until it can be processed. Now, the reason that any of these calculations happens at a reasonable amount of time is because the CPU can do each of the calculations extremely fast.

For instance, a single core of my Intel e7200 Duo Core processor can run at 2.6 GHz. That measurement, Hertz, means Cycles per Second. So, my 2.6 GHz core can make 2.6 BILLION calculations. Now, I know that this isn't entirely true, because Clock Rate alone doesn't make a processor. But for the sake of keeping it simple, let's pretend it does.

Another thing that affects processing speed is how many floating-point calculations can be made. I am not even going to try and understand this, because this is beyond me. But I will try to give the basics of how it works. Here is a quote from Wikipedia.org:

So, essentially, it is a type of calculation that can be done quickly. A processor can handle a specific amount of these calculations per second.

One of my main complaints of CPU physics is that in some games, if too many physics calculations are needed suddenly, your gameplay FPS can drop substantially. Since the CPU is clogged with physics calculations, the GPU has to wait on data, your network has to wait on data, and the entire game just slows down.

So physics on a processor isn't bad. Righto? It can be done, and it can be done well. But since more and more things are becoming calculated by physics, and more is going on in a CPU than simply your video game, it's not the best solution.

How does a PPU process physics?

A PPU, once again, essentially offloads all those calculations to a separate processor, freeing up the CPU. The PPU calculates all these physics, their constraints, etc, and feeds the answers to the CPU. And since you just took all those millions of calculations elsewhere, the CPU can now easily throw a bunch of rocks around and not have to worry about it.

Now, another advantage of the Ageia PPU is that it has a very high floating-point, so it can do many of these "quick" calculations per second.

Next, the PPU also does something called Parallel Computing. It can perform many calculations at the same time, by splitting large calculations into smaller ones, and solving them simultaneously. From nVidia's PhysX FAQ page:

Yeah, tens of cores. These large calculations were split down into tens of smaller ones, then solved together at the same time. This allowed the PPU to make more of these similar calculations faster than a CPU.

I know that there are other advantages to using a PPU, but quite simply, I have spent over 4 hours researching, learning, and writing this, so I'm not going to go deeper in the multi-threading, or whatever.

How does a GPU process physics?/Why is it better than the CPU?

First off, I think that GPU's aren't the best solution to solve this problem with CPU physics. I believe that solution was the Ageia PPU, but it had problems. It wasn't well advertised, it was expensive, and it was only used in a few games. And then there is this problem with people who don't want to buy new things, or things that can't be easily explained to them. So that's gone.

However, the GPU is still a much better place for physics calculations to take place. It has all the things that made the PPU a good thing, such as a highly parallel architecture, many cores, multi threading, high floating points, etc. Plus, they are already very popular among low-end gamers, all the way up to high-end gamers.

From nVidia.com:

Plus, since the GPU is very much mass-produced, the prices are much lower than the PPU.

To end this lengthily FAQ, I hope you all have a better understanding on What PhysX is, Why it is better on a GPU, and that maybe you learned something. Please help me with this FAQ by pointing out spelling or grammar mistakes, pointing out informational mistakes, or adding to it. Also, if SOMEONE can easily explain multi-threading or floating-point, that would be awesome.

THANKS FOR READING! EXPECT SOME MORE STUPIDLY LONG FAQ'S FROM ME IN THE FUTURE!

___

Some sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_Computing
http://www.nvidia.com/page/home.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia_physx.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhysX
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_processing_unit
http://www.nvidia.com/object/io_1202161567170.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_rate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_processing_unit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_point
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...her+AND+bordes

PS: Games that use PhysX

__________________
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike. What about you?

JTD92

Nice write up. I suggest you make a 8800GS/9600GSO Info thread. Rep+

__________________

CorporalAris

I will. Either tonight or tomorrow. Thanks!

__________________
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike. What about you?

zaeric19

Wow, very informative, +rep for putting this together.

__________________

CorporalAris

Ugh, thanks. I feel like sleeping now.

__________________
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike. What about you?

Lukeatluke

Thanks for info and nice FAQ.

Rep++ for curiosity and time spend on writting this.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takendown2; NO SYSTEM IS EVER GOING TO BE FUTURE PROOF!!!

PM me my English mistakes anytime.

OmegaNemesis28

Nice thread. + rep

Btw, what is weird is that............ there are pictures of Halo, Crysis, and Counter-Strike Source yet they aren't PhysX based. They show off physics but not PhysX

__________________

CorporalAris

I know, I realized that after I posted it. I need to go and change it. It was supposed to be show the effects that I was talking about, but it doesn't quite work right.

__________________
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike. What about you?

benfica101

Nice FAQ ive always wanted to know about Phys-x ever since the Ageia card came out, wanted to know what it did, since i didnt know i never bought it manly cause it was $200, but yeah nice man +REP

__________________
3dmark 06 20,182
Furmark: 7246 score
3dmark Vantage P15,369
Windows Vista Exp: 5.8
System Upgrade 2011

CorporalAris

Cool, thanks for reading!

__________________
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike. What about you?