[hwbot] CPU-Z ranking - Page 9 - Overclock.net

AmericanNightmare · 08-01-07

[hwbot]AmericanNightmare - 2940.81 mhz - Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Toledo@2940.81 mhz on air[/hwbot]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=221233

KTE · 08-03-07

Wow guys, I would ask you make it incumbent and only accept those that are X86 verified as there's many bugs with software, overclocking software and when overclocking through the use of PLL.

Such as this attached image.

**CL3P20** · 08-03-07

Uhh, whatever that means...

American Nightmare's is verified...see the CPU-Z number on the bottom left side of his pic? While the pic KTE posts, shows no such verification number.

So really, your submission violates your own statement...nice.

KTE · 08-03-07

Quote:

Originally Posted by CL3P20

Uhh, whatever that means...

American Nightmare's is verified...see the CPU-Z number on the bottom left side of his pic? While the pic KTE posts, shows no such verification number.

So really, your submission violates your own statement...nice.

What?

I said, the picture in my post is a classic example of faulty CPUZ readings. So only verifications can count as legitimate. Hopefully you understand now.

Nothing to do with AmericanNightmare's post.

**CL3P20** · 08-03-07

Quote:

I said, the picture in my post is a classic example of faulty CPUZ readings.

You implied it was a fake..

Really, this is a verification thread. Everyone knows that CPU-z can read funky things sometimes..most all of the posts I have seen if not verified, are genuine, showing superpi times or some other benchmark score + system vitals and CPU-Z..I believe you are the first to post a fake pic. Why not just post a real one for the comparison chart?

KTE · 08-04-07

Quote:

Originally Posted by CL3P20

You implied it was a fake..

I implied what was fake? The picture I attached? That's the only one I said was wrong.

That's not fake but it's close enough to be because it's not the real frequency either. That frequency is impossible on that processor, it's a faulty (high) motherboard PLL reporting higher clock speeds when overclocked. Other software will prove the same.

The point of posting it was as an example to be aware. Ask CPU-Z developers Franck and Samuel if Core 2 can experience the same faulty readings or not, and they'll let you know it does and has. Only a verification can prove or negate that.

Quote:

Really, this is a verification thread. Everyone knows that CPU-z can read funky things sometimes..

My intention was to ask the OP to accept only those with an X86 verification.

Quote:

most all of the posts I have seen if not verified, are genuine, showing superpi times or some other benchmark score + system vitals and CPU-Z..I believe you are the first to post a fake pic. Why not just post a real one for the comparison chart?

That's not a fake, you can ask CPUZ developers, they know about it.

The stock normal clocks are irrelevant since they're so old. Stock is 1300MHz. I'm busy posting elsewhere for now and work+studies, but once I get time and do a little writeup (with all benchmarks) I'll post the link for you to see for yourself and a video. If you want to see a lot more earlier, just PM me.

Speaking of benchmarks, if you trust any single benchmark which you believe is "fool proof" then you might aswell name it now, and I'll try running it too when I get access.

Ones I will name that do show the real frequency effects best and cannot be fooled are Cinebench and encode/decode/compression/decompression benches.

**CL3P20** · 08-04-07

This isnt a discussion thread..it is for verification comparisons..if your not going to post a CPU-Z shot for the comparison chart, then start a 'complaining about CL3P20' thread elsewheres.

cheers!

{core2duo}werd · 08-04-07

[hwbot]{core2duo}werd - 3501.34 MHz - Q6600@3501.34 Mhz on water[/hwbot]
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=224492

verbatim81973 · 08-06-07

[hwbot] Verbatim81973 - 3664MHz - C2D E6750 (2.66ghz)@3664MHz on air[/hwbot]

**CL3P20** · 08-06-07

[hwbot]L712A- Q6600 @ 430mhz FSB/3ghz/1.28vcore[/hwbot]
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=213079
[hwbot]L707A- E6320 @ 400mhz FSB/2.8ghz/1.32vcore[/hwbot]
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=215231

08-03-07	#82 (permalink)
KTE New to Overclock.net Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3 Rep: 0 Unique Rep: 0 Trader Rating: 0	Wow guys, I would ask you make it incumbent and only accept those that are X86 verified as there's many bugs with software, overclocking software and when overclocking through the use of PLL. Such as this attached image. Attached Thumbnails

		Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Benchmarks > Overclock.net HWBot Team
[hwbot] CPU-Z ranking

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)