Custom Warhead Config Comparison - Page 2 - Overclock.net

OmegaNemesis28 · 09-28-08

Quote:

Originally Posted by hairston630

They have...I posted the link to this config days ago and even gave screenshots and info on installing it with the extreme texture config. Busta used the level 4 CCConfig as a template and further tweaked it for better performance and quality. The key to gaining more fps with this mod is by using a gamer shadow setting along with a decreased view distance to reduce memory usage and fps drops.

http://www.overclock.net/4622480-post679.html

Here are the links to my first post on this config when it was released: http://www.overclock.net/pc-games/39...c-warhead.html

Here are screenshots with the texture mod included: http://www.overclock.net/4622171-post673.html

http://www.overclock.net/4622480-post679.html

You can find more comparisons posted here http://www.overclock.net/pc-games/38...thread-68.html all within the "pc games" forum.

Nemesis, I would recommend that you install Rygels texture pack. It will make the game look significantly better and run the same. Also, in your config file that you downloaded from bustas, you should set your values for your cpu to match the cores that you have, if you havent done so. You will get even better performance by setting the config to utilize the correct amount of core

Thanks - can you give me a link to that rygels texture pack as I cannot find it.

hairston630 · 09-28-08

Quote:

Originally Posted by OmegaNemesis28

Thanks - can you give me a link to that rygels texture pack as I cannot find it.

Rygel Texture Pack

**Marin** · 09-28-08

http://www.overclock.net/4624411-post687.html

Some screenshots. Also I am wondering, can the texture mod be added onto this mod?

hairston630 · 09-28-08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marin

http://www.overclock.net/4624411-post687.html

Some screenshots. Also I am wondering, can the texture mod be added onto this mod?

Yes it seems to work ok with mine. I have already posted pics with it added.

OmegaNemesis28 · 09-29-08

Quote:

Originally Posted by hairston630

Yes it seems to work ok with mine. I have already posted pics with it added.

works fine for me too

OmegaNemesis28 · 10-14-08

bump

voice · 10-14-08

Seems all this config does is take away loads of foliage and up the contrast.

OmegaNemesis28 · 10-15-08

Quote:

Originally Posted by voice

Seems all this config does is take away loads of foliage and up the contrast.

It makes it look like DX10, adding color to it, gives you Edge_AA2, and makes it have awesome framerates. The only foilage missing that I can note are the little weeds. If it were the bushes - I would care. But it's not.

OmegaNemesis28 · 10-19-08

bump for others to see

TheProfiteer · 10-19-08

To me it looks like this.

The Configed screens look like the have motion blur disabled, and have a lot of foliage deactivated. Also the lighting makes it look much sharper but much more artificial.

DX10 and DX9 look almost the same too me, so I dont see what the big fuss with DX10 is all about. Only thing is that DX10 looks a tad bit sharper than DX9, but its definitely not worth the drop in FPS.

In conclusion Crysis is still a resources hogging game that does not deliver on the promise, and is not justified at all for all the resources it hogs. Also the config files are no magic solution to anything, and in fact do not make the game look any better. And on my system (when was using my 8800GTX) it made Warehead run 10x worse than it did with out it. It was the very same config file you were using.

		Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Video Games > PC Games
Custom Warhead Config Comparison

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)