Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Cooling > Peltiers / TEC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-23-07   #1 (permalink)
Extreme Cooler
 
Ultrasonic2 (muffy)'s Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 705

Rep: 43 Ultrasonic2 (muffy) is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 31
Trader Rating: 0
Default TEC efficiency relative to Phase change.

This is something I noticed when looking in to phase change. I was always under the impression that Phase change was considerable more efficient that TEC cooling. Is totally true when comparing a phase change unit to a TEC running at Umax (max volts).However I was fully aware that as you lower the voltage a TEC becomes more efficient, as in it can move more heat in watts relative the wattage used to do so. I went down to a local Air con shop and got some numbers on Phase change units. There was a unit there that used 950watts of electricity to provide 3200watts of cooling. This is a ratio of 3.36 watts moved for every watt used. This compares to a TEC running at about 40 % of Umax at 26.85 (300k) ambient. Below 40% the TEC moves more heat per watt than the phase change unit does
Ultrasonic2 (muffy) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-07   #2 (permalink)
Turing Test is Overrated
 
DuckieHo's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a Chair.
Posts: 22,190

Rep: 2552 DuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legendDuckieHo is a legend
Unique Rep: 1191
Trader Rating: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrasonic2 (muffy) View Post
This is something I noticed when looking in to phase change. I was always under the impression that Phase change was considerable more efficient that TEC cooling. Is totally true when comparing a phase change unit to a TEC running at Umax (max volts).However I was fully aware that as you lower the voltage a TEC becomes more efficient, as in it can move more heat in watts relative the wattage used to do so. I went down to a local Air con shop and got some numbers on Phase change units. There was a unit there that used 950watts of electricity to provide 3200watts of cooling. This is a ratio of 3.36 watts moved for every watt used. This compares to a TEC running at about 40 % of Umax at 26.85 (300k) ambient. Below 40% the TEC moves more heat per watt than the phase change unit does
Hmmmm... How big was the phase unit? A 950w phase sounds much bigger than most PC based ones.

Also, I am a bit confused... the unit uses 950w to move 3200w. How is that possible? It is doing more work than power consumed.
__________________
To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3GB or so (3) PCIe 2.0 is backwards compatible with PCIe 1.x (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) If you have a question, it is not news (6) Read TOS (7) Report, not respond to Spam (8) Uninstall nTune (9) Single/Non-Modular Rail PSUs are NOT better than Multi-Rail/Modular (10) Edward is the Law!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brythe View Post
But I still dont get it, whats the thing between the chair and the desk?

edit: got it..haha..its meee

System: My "DF-DIE" Replacement
CPU
Q6600 (3.7GHz)
Motherboard
Asus P5E X38 (MF1208 BIOS)
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Reaper 1096MHz
Graphics Card
8800GT (729/1836/2088)
Hard Drive
PERC 5/i: 3xRAID0 Raptor 74GB + 7200.10 250GB
Sound Card
X-Fi XtremeMusic
Power Supply
Corsair 620HX
Case
Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans]
CPU cooling
FuZion V2 + Quad-Heatercore
GPU cooling
MCW60 + Iandh HS + DDC-3.2
OS
Vista Ultimate 64
Monitor
Samsung 226BW "C" + Sceptre 19"
DuckieHo is offline Overclocked Account DuckieHo's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-07   #3 (permalink)
ASUS COMMANDO Corps
 
ChielScape's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maarheeze
Posts: 4,276

Rep: 285 ChielScape is a proven memberChielScape is a proven memberChielScape is a proven member
Unique Rep: 229
Trader Rating: 0
Default

a pelt can move more energy than it uses... as much as 5 times the amount when undervolted.
it just moves energy, it doesnt really do anything with it.
__________________
Radeon X700 replaced by 8400GS, PC actually works flawlessly now.
1GB Xtreem died, took X-Fi with it. PSU's fault. - Ordered new RAM and PSU. PCP&C 1KW + 2GB OCZ 800Mhz up and running.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewgy View Post
Umm, have some respect, that's Duke Nukem, and it looks as if he's out of gum.

System: Name pending... (vista yet to be installed)
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
ASUS Maximus II F
Memory
2GB OCZ 1GB Team
Graphics Card
XFX 8800GTX
Hard Drive
2x 500GB JBOD
Sound Card
Maximus II X-Fi
Power Supply
PCP&C TC 1000W
Case
Lian Li Armorsuit PC-P80
CPU cooling
GTX480 w/ Ultra Kaze 3000's
OS
Vista Ultimate
Monitor
2x 19" CRT
ChielScape is online now Overclocked Account ChielScape's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-07   #4 (permalink)
Extreme Cooler
 
Ultrasonic2 (muffy)'s Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 705

Rep: 43 Ultrasonic2 (muffy) is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 31
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
Hmmmm... How big was the phase unit? A 950w phase sounds much bigger than most PC based ones.

Also, I am a bit confused... the unit uses 950w to move 3200w. How is that possible? It is doing more work than power consumed.

It's possible because its a pump ... its the same in water cooling or air cooling.. your 10watts water pump moves 200watts of heat from your CPU to your radiator to be cooled with a 3 watt fan which moves the heat from the water to the air .. the heat is in the water the pump just moves it from one place to another. So you can say in an air cooling system your cooling a 200watt load with 3watts of electricty

it was a bigger unit than most PC's use it was about 11,000 BTU's .. they had much bigger ones in the shop too.
Ultrasonic2 (muffy) is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License Internet Security By ControlScan

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2008 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.93063 seconds with 9 queries