Upgrading from a i7 920 I didn't notice and difference in games or general use and it runs quite a bit hotter than the standard i7s.
None of these drawbacks matter because the sole purpose of this CPU is folding power. My CPU PPD went up from 12,000 to ~35,000. These sort of results are extremely close to that of the flagship Intel Extreme processors but costing a little over half the price.
I'm sure that with some lovely water cooling you could get the load temps below 60c and the clock speed up to 4.5GHz. My little H70 can only just cope with 4.2GHz.
If you want future proofing this is your chip as not GPUs for quite a few years will be bottle necked by this chip.
It gets a 4.5 because there is a issue with the multi that doesn't allow 25x without a hardware mod other than that I can find no faults with this chip.
I upgraded to the i7 970 from the 920 with the Intel Retail Edge program. Best investment I have made into my rig. Period. This chip is also highly overlooked, given that at the launch price the 980X or 990X could be had for not much more.
For starters, it runs cooler than the 920 despite the additional cores. Maybe I had a less-than-stellar 920 (ok, I did - but still, read on) but this chip is decently cooler at a higher clock on more cores in my experience. Under an H50 with OCZ Freeze at 4.2GHz I load at roughly 62C, peaking at 70C if I let it run overnight in a burn-in test - and that's at 1.25v.
The stock cooler that comes with it is a beast, too - which is a nice surprise. The temps were more than acceptable for stock clocks, and even giving it a slight kick to 3.90GHz and a small voltage bump didn't get unreasonable (holds at 70C after about 20 minutes of burn-in) - though for a folding machine or a 24/7 use you'd probably want to stay stock if you wanted to use the stock cooler.
As far as the review by jeffries7 goes, I'm not sure what hardware mod he is referring to as my chip runs on a 25x multi on my ASUS Rampage II GENE fine without complaint - but I will note that most reports say that this chip has a more stable overclock with a 23x or 21x multi. Your experience may vary.
Pros
Cons
Solid clocker, low volts needed, stock cooler holds its' own even with mild OC'ing
It is a great processor that still completely keeps up with the newer Intel and AMD generations. I was able to OC it to 4.4Ghz under air cooling, and the performance is phenomenal. This cpu handles multi-threaded applications incredibly well -in fact at 4.4ghz it is well faster than a stock i7-3960X (I am well aware the latter can be overclocked as well, but it still shows how powerful this cpu is). The single-threaded peformance is also excellent, though it comes at 10-12% worse than SB. The chip however can easily handle driving twopowerful cards such as the GTX 680in SLI with both GPUs at 95+% usage at all times.
so to summerize for multi-threaded usage it easily bests Bulldozer, Thuban, even socket 1155 SBs easily, and for gaming it comes very close to the current generation of Intel CPUs, and also handijly beats BD and Phenom IIs. All of this from a CPU released and bought in 2010 for $500.
Pros
Cons
Fantastic performance, Oc'able, handles GTX 680 SLI with no problem
Still expensive even if I got it at a discounted price of $500, also runs hot
Ratings
Overall
5
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!