Overclock.net banner

OCZ Vertex 4 VTX4-25SAT3-256G 2.5"" MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

279 views 1 reply 2 participants last post by  Overclock Reviews 
#1 ·
OCZ Vertex 4 VTX4-25SAT3-256G 2.5"" MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

Description:
Sustained Sequential Read: Up to 560 MB/s Sustained Sequential Write: Up to 510 MB/s 4KB Random Read: Up to 90,000 IOPS 4KB Random Write: Up to 120,000 IOPS Power Consumption (Active): 2.5W Power Consumption (Idle): 1.3W Max Shock Resistance: 1500G Used For: Consumer

Details:
DetailValue
ManufacturerOCZ Technology
UPC842024030362
ConditionNew
Model NumberVTX4-25SAT3-256G
ClassificationSolid State Disk
 

Attachments

See less See more
1
#2 ·
Three years later and still kicking

review by mr357

I bought mine back in July of 2012, and it was my first SSD ever. I did a clean install of Windows 7 Ultimate, and the difference was obviously night and day after using a WD Caviar Green for the previous year. Even after I filled most of it up and used it for several months, I could still go from the BIOS splash to the Windows login screen in about 5-7 seconds (the Windows logo animation wouldn't even finish
tongue.gif
). As previously mentioned, the Vertex 4 is not a Sandforce drive, meaning it avoided most or all of the issues seen in the Vertex 2 and 3 which had given OCZ a pretty terrible reputation. The Indilinx controller in the Vertex 4 is simply just fast, rather than using compression techniques like the Sandforce controllers. This leads to more consistent overall data transfers, even if the Sandforce drives boast higher random read/write speeds. I've since replaced this drive with a Crucial M550, but I still love it and use it. In fact, it's a little faster than the M550, even after being 70% or more full and used daily for 2 1/2 years longer.
headscratch.gif


ProsCons
Lightning fast, even when compared to much newer models; not a Sandforce drive like 80% of SSD's from that generationNone come to mind

Ratings
Overall5
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top